CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Functional Plant Biology   
Functional Plant Biology
  Plant Function & Evolutionary Biology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Evolutionary Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Referee Guidelines
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 PrometheusWiki
PrometheusWiki
Protocols in ecological and environmental plant physiology

 

Article << Previous     |         Contents Vol 7(5)

Stomatal Behaviour of Kenaf and Sorghum in a Semiarid Tropical Environment. II. During the Day

RC Muchow, MJ Fisher, MM Ludlow and RJK Myers

Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 7(5) 621 - 628

Abstract

The influence of leaf water potential (Ψl), saturation deficit (δe), and temperature on stornatal conductance (gs) of kenaf and sorghum was determined at non-limiting quantum fluxes both at high and low soil water status in the field, and under controlled environment conditions. Sorghum stomata closed in response to Ψl in a manner consistent with the classical feedback control, while kenaf stomata responded directly to δe, independently of Ψl. The rate of decrease of gs of kenaf with increasing δe was greater at higher temperatures. Also the stomata of stressed kenaf were less sensitive to δe than those of the well-watered crop due to the limitation in degree of stomatal opening imposed by water stress.

The degree of stomatal adjustment in kenaf was also assessed. In the stressed kenaf, the Ψl at half the maximum gs was c. 0.17 MPa lower and gs was more sensitive to decreases in Ψl, than in the well watered control. However, there was little difference in the Ψl at 95% stomatal closure.



Full text doi:10.1071/PP9800621

© CSIRO 1980

 
PDF (344 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012