Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

It's not a ‘thing’ but a ‘place’: reconceptualising ‘assets’ in the context of fire risk landscapes

Ruth Beilin A B and Karen Reid A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Landscape Sociology Group, Department of Resource Management and Geography, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: rbeilin@unimelb.edu.au

International Journal of Wildland Fire 24(1) 130-137 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF14035
Submitted: 18 March 2014  Accepted: 4 September 2014   Published: 16 December 2014

Abstract

At a national policy level, Australian governments have embraced the notion of shared responsibility between agencies and communities for disaster resilience, including bushfire. Emergency management agencies take an asset-based approach to management based on an assumption that valued places can be quantified by cataloguing individual ‘things’ in the landscape. Implicit in shared responsibility, however, is incorporation of local knowledge of landscape and risk into planning. This already difficult task can be made more complex as local constructions of risk in the landscape sometimes appear at odds with management agency perspectives. This research examined local constructions of bushfire risk in two contrasting Australian landscapes – one semi-rural, one peri-urban. The results suggest that local ecological knowledge arises from interactions between people, the landscape and objects (e.g. flora and fauna) in the landscape. Place meanings transcend individual ‘things’, emerging instead from experience of the whole landscape, both social and ecological and at multiple scales. We argue therefore, that understanding bushfire cannot be segregated from wider social and ecological processes at a landscape level. Shared responsibility will involve respectful and meaningful engagement between agencies and landholders in collaborative planning to ensure local knowledge informs asset-based management.

Additional keywords: Adelaide Hills, narrative mapping, social construction of bushfire, social construction of landscape, Southern Grampians.


References

Alexandra J, Riddington C (2007) Redreaming the rural landscape. Futures 39, 324–339.
Redreaming the rural landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alkon AH, Traugot M (2008) Place matters, but how? Rural identity, environmental decision making and the social construction of place. City & Community 7, 97–112.
Place matters, but how? Rural identity, environmental decision making and the social construction of place.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Attiwill PM, Adams MA (2013) Mega-fires, inquiries and politics in the eucalypt forests of Victoria, south-eastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 294, 45–53.
Mega-fires, inquiries and politics in the eucalypt forests of Victoria, south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bihari M, Ryan R (2012) Influence of social capital on community preparedness for wildfires. Landscape and Urban Planning 106, 253–261.
Influence of social capital on community preparedness for wildfires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brenkert-Smith H (2006) The place of fire. Natural Hazards Review 7, 105–113.
The place of fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cacciapaglia MA, Yung L, Patterson ME (2012) Place mapping and the role of spatial scale in understanding landowner view of fire and fuels management. Society & Natural Resources 25, 453–467.
Place mapping and the role of spatial scale in understanding landowner view of fire and fuels management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheng AS, Kruger LE, Daniels SE (2003) ‘Place’ as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: propositions for a social science research agenda. Society & Natural Resources 16, 87–104.
‘Place’ as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: propositions for a social science research agenda.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Clarke PA, Gepp B, Vickery F, Wouters M, Henderson M (2005) The urban forest 4: fire, biology and city living. In ‘Adelaide: nature of a city’. (Eds CB Daniels, CJ Tait, T Flannery) pp. 423–453. (Wakefield: Adelaide, SA)

Council of Australian Governments. (2011) National strategy for disaster resilience. (Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra, ACT).

Gill N (1994) The cultural politics of resource management: the case of bushfires in a conservation reserve. Australian Geographical Studies 32, 224–240.
The cultural politics of resource management: the case of bushfires in a conservation reserve.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gill AM (2012) Fire regimes, biodiversity conservation and prescribed-burning programs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 124, 1–6.

Greider T, Garkovich L (1994) Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology 59, 1–24.
Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griffiths T (2002) How many trees make a forest? Cultural debates about vegetation change in Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 50, 375–389.
How many trees make a forest? Cultural debates about vegetation change in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Griffiths T (2009) We have still not lived long enough. Inside Story 16 February 2009 Available at http://insidestory.org.au/we-have-still-not-lived-long-enough/ [Verified 9 October 2014]

Gunderson K, Watson A (2007) Understanding place meanings on the Bitterroot National Forest, Montana. Society & Natural Resources 20, 705–721.
Understanding place meanings on the Bitterroot National Forest, Montana.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hammersley M, Atkinson P (2007) ‘Ethnography: principles in practice.’ (Routledge: London)

Harris S, Anderson W, Kilinc M, Fogarty L (2012) The relationship between fire behaviour measures and community loss: an exploratory analysis for developing a bushfire severity scale. Natural Hazards 63, 391–415.
The relationship between fire behaviour measures and community loss: an exploratory analysis for developing a bushfire severity scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kruger LE, Jakes PJ (2003) The importance of place: advances in science and application. Forest Science 49, 819–821.

Meinig DW (1979) ‘The interpretation of ordinary landscapes.’ (Oxford Press: New York).

Powell K (2010) Making sense of place: mapping as a multisensory research method. Qualitative Inquiry 16, 539–555.
Making sense of place: mapping as a multisensory research method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reid K, Beilin R (2014) Where’s the fire? Co-constructing bushfire in the everyday landscape. Society & Natural Resources 27, 140–154.
Where’s the fire? Co-constructing bushfire in the everyday landscape.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

RFS (2013). Hotspots Project. Available at http://www.rfs.nsw.gov.au/dsp_content.cfm?cat_id=1724 [Verified 26 August 2013]

Sampson KA, Goodrich CG (2009) Making place: identity construction and community formation through ‘sense of place’ in Westland, New Zealand. Society & Natural Resources 22, 901–915.
Making place: identity construction and community formation through ‘sense of place’ in Westland, New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Samuels MS (1979) The biography of landscape. In ‘The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays.’ (Ed. D Meinig.) pp. 51–88 (Oxford Press: New York).

Stedman RC (2003) Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society & Natural Resources 16, 671–685.
Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stedman R (2008) What do we ‘mean’ by place meanings? Implications of place meanings for managers and practitioners. In ‘Understanding concepts of place in recreation research and management’, (Eds L Kruger, T Hall, M Stiefel) USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PNW-GTR-744, pp. 61–81. (Portland OR).

Whittaker J, Mercer D (2004) The Victorian Bushfire of 2002–03 and the politics of blame: a discourse analysis. The Australian Geographer 35, 259–287.
The Victorian Bushfire of 2002–03 and the politics of blame: a discourse analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wylie J (2007) ‘Landscape.’ (Routledge: London).

Yin R (2003) ‘Case study research: design and methods.’ (SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA)