Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Fuel accumulation and forest structure change following hazardous fuel reduction treatments throughout California

Nicole M. Vaillant A F , Erin K. Noonan-Wright B , Alicia L. Reiner C , Carol M. Ewell C , Benjamin M. Rau D , Josephine A. Fites-Kaufman E and Scott N. Dailey C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment Center, 3160 NE Third Street, Prineville, OR 97754, USA.

B USDA Forest Service, Wildland Fire Management Research, Development and Application, 5765 W Broadway, Missoula, MT 59808, USA.

C USDA Forest Service, Adaptive Management Services Enterprise Team, 631 Coyote Street, Nevada City, CA 95959, USA.

D USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Center for Forest Watershed Research, Savanah River Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 241 Gateway Drive, Aiken, SC 29803, USA.

E USDA Forest Service, Region 5 Regional Office, 1323 Club Drive, Vallejo, CA 94592, USA.

F Corresponding author. Email: nvaillant@fs.fed.us

International Journal of Wildland Fire 24(3) 361-371 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF14082
Submitted: 10 May 2014  Accepted: 23 October 2014   Published: 21 April 2015

Abstract

Altered fuel conditions coupled with changing climate have disrupted fire regimes of forests historically characterised by high-frequency and low-to-moderate-severity fire. Managers use fuel treatments to abate undesirable fire behaviour and effects. Short-term effectiveness of fuel treatments to alter fire behaviour and effects is well documented; however, long-term effectiveness is not well known. We evaluated surface fuel load, vegetation cover and forest structure before and after mechanical and fire-only treatments over 8 years across 11 National Forests in California. Eight years post treatment, total surface fuel load returned to 67 to 79% and 55 to 103% of pretreatment levels following fire-only and mechanical treatments respectively. Herbaceous or shrub cover exceeded pretreatment levels two-thirds of the time 8 years after treatment. Fire-only treatments warranted re-entry at 8 years post treatment owing to the accumulation of live and dead fuels and minimal impact on canopy bulk density. In general, mechanical treatments were more effective at reducing canopy bulk density and initially increasing canopy base height than prescribed fire. However, elevated surface fuel loads, canopy base height reductions in later years and lack of restoration of fire as an ecological process suggest that including prescribed fire would be beneficial.

Additional keywords: dry mixed conifer, mechanical treatments, moist mixed conifer, prescribed fire, yellow pine.


References

Agee JK (1996) ‘Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests.’ (Island Press: Washington, DC)

Agee JK, Skinner CN (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 211, 83–96.
Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Agee JK, Bahro BB, Finney MA, Omi PN, Sapsis DB, Skinner CN, van Wagtendonk JW, Weatherspoon CP (2000) The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. Forest Ecology and Management 127, 55–66.
The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Alexander ME (1988) Help with making crown fire hazard assessments. In ‘Protecting People and Homes from Wildfire in the Interior West: Proceedings of the Symposium and Workshop, 6–8 October1988, Missoula, MT’. (Compilers WC Fischer, SF Arno). USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-GTR-251, pp. 147–156. (Ogden, UT)

Brown JK (1974) Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report INT-GTR-16. (Ogden, UT)

Caprio AC, Conover C, Keifer M, Lineback P (2002) Fire management and GIS: a framework for identifying and prioritizing fire planning needs. In ‘Proceedings of the Symposium: Fire in California Ecosystems: Integrating Ecology, Prevention and Management’, 17–20 November 1997, San Diego, CA. (Eds NG Sugihara, ME Morales, TJ Morales) Miscellaneous Publication No. 1, Association for Fire Ecology, pp. 102–113.

Chiono LA, O’Hara KL, De Lasaux MJ, Nader GA, Stephens SL (2012) Development of vegetation and surface fuels following fire hazard reduction treatment. Forests 3, 700–722.
Development of vegetation and surface fuels following fire hazard reduction treatment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Collins BM, Miller JD, Thode AE, Kelly M, van Wagtendonk JW, Stephens SL (2009) Interactions among wildland fires in a long-established Sierra Nevada natural fire area. Ecosystems 12, 114–128.
Interactions among wildland fires in a long-established Sierra Nevada natural fire area.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Collins BM, Stephens SL, Moghaddas JJ, Battles J (2010) Challenges and approaches in planning fuel treatments across fire-excluded forested landscapes. Journal of Forestry 108, 24–31.

Crookston NL, Dixon GE (2005) The Forest Vegetation Simulator: a review of its structure, content, and applications. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 49, 60–80.
The Forest Vegetation Simulator: a review of its structure, content, and applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cruz MG, Alexander ME, Wakimoto RH (2004) Modeling the likelihood of crown fire occurrence in conifer forest stands. Forest Science 50, 640–658.

Daubenmire R (1959) A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Science 33, 43–64.

DeLuca TH, Aplet GH, Wilmer B, Burchfield J (2010) The unknown trajectory of forest restoration: a call for ecosystem monitoring. Journal of Forestry 108, 288–295.

Evans AM, Everett RG, Stephens SL, Youtz JA (2011) Comprehensive fuels treatment practices guide for mixed conifer forests: California, central and southern Rockies, and the Southwest. Report by the Forest Guild and Forest Service. Available at: http://www.firescience.gov/projects/09-2-01-7/project/09-2-01-7_final_report.pdf [Verified 8 May 2014]

Fettig CJ, McKelvey SR, Cluck DR, Smith SL, Otrosina WJ (2010) Effects of prescribed fire and season of burn on direct and indirect levels of tree mortality in ponderosa and Jeffrey pine forests in California, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 260, 207–218.
Effects of prescribed fire and season of burn on direct and indirect levels of tree mortality in ponderosa and Jeffrey pine forests in California, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fites-Kaufman JA, Bradley AF, Merrill AG (2006) Fire and plant interactions. In ‘Fire in California’s Ecosystems’. (Eds NG Sugihara, JW van Wagtendonk, KE Shaffer, J Fites-Kaufman, AE Thode) pp. 94–117. (University of California: Berkeley, CA)

Fulé PZ, Laughlin DC, Covington WW (2005) Pine–oak forest dynamics five years after ecological restoration treatments, Arizona, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 218, 129–145.
Pine–oak forest dynamics five years after ecological restoration treatments, Arizona, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fulé PZ, Crouse JE, Roccafort JP, Kalies EL (2012) Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior? Forest Ecology and Management 269, 68–81.
Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hardy CC (2005) Wildland fire hazard and risk: problems, definitions, and context. Forest Ecology and Management 211, 73–82.
Wildland fire hazard and risk: problems, definitions, and context.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hunter ME, Shepperd WD, Lentile LB, Lundquist JE, Andreu MG, Butler JL, Smith FW (2007) A comprehensive guide to fuels treatment practices for ponderosa pine in the Black Hills, Colorado Front Range, and Southwest. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-198. (Fort Collins, CO)

Innes JC, North MP, Williamson N (2006) Effect of thinning and prescribed fire restoration treatments on woody debris and snag dynamics in a Sierran old-growth, mixed-conifer forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36, 3183–3193.
Effect of thinning and prescribed fire restoration treatments on woody debris and snag dynamics in a Sierran old-growth, mixed-conifer forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kauffman JB, Martin RE (1989) Fire behavior, fuel consumption, and forest-floor changes following prescribed understory fires in Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19, 455–462.
Fire behavior, fuel consumption, and forest-floor changes following prescribed understory fires in Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keane RE, Gray K, Bacciu V (2012) Spatial variability of wildland fuel characteristics in northern Rocky Mountain ecosystems. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-98. (Fort Collins, CO)

Keifer M, van Wagtendonk JW, Buhler M (2006) Long-term surface fuel accumulation in burned and unburned mixed-conifer forests of the central and southern Sierra Nevada, CA (USA). Fire Ecology 2, 53–72.
Long-term surface fuel accumulation in burned and unburned mixed-conifer forests of the central and southern Sierra Nevada, CA (USA).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Korb JE, Daniels ML, Laughlin DC, Fulé PZ (2007) Understory communities of warm dry, mixed-conifer forests in south-western Colorado. The Southwestern Naturalist 52, 493–503.
Understory communities of warm dry, mixed-conifer forests in south-western Colorado.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lee DC, Ager AA, Calkin DE, Finney MA, Thompson MP, Quigley TM, McHugh CW (2011) National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. Available at: http://www.doi.gov/pmb/owf/upload/1_CohesiveStrategy03172011.pdf [Verified 8 May 2014]

Lutes DC, Benson NC, Keifer M, Caratti JF, Streetman SA (2009) FFI: a software tool for ecological monitoring. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 310–314.
FFI: a software tool for ecological monitoring.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mallek C, Safford H, Viers J, Miller J (2013) Modern departures in fire severity and area vary by forest type, Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascades, California, USA. Ecosphere 4, art153
Modern departures in fire severity and area vary by forest type, Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascades, California, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Martinson EJ, Omi PN (2013) Fuel treatments and fire severity: a meta-analysis. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-103WWW. (Fort Collins, CO)

McIver J, Erickson K, Youngblood A (2012) Principal short-term findings of the National Fire and Fire Surrogate study. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-860. (Portland, OR)

Miller JD, Safford HD, Crimmins M, Thode AE (2009) Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12, 16–32.
Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

North MP, Collins BM, Stephens SL (2012) Using fire to increase the scale, benefits and future maintenance of fuels treatments. Journal of Forestry 110, 392–401.
Using fire to increase the scale, benefits and future maintenance of fuels treatments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rebain SA (Compiler) (2010) The Fire and Fuels Extension to the Forest Vegetation Simulator, updated model documentation. USDA Forest Service, Internal Report. Available online at: http://www.fs.fed.us/fmsc/ftp/fvs/docs/gtr/FFEguide.pdf [Verified 8 May 2014]

Reiner AL, Vaillant NM, Fites-Kaufman J, Dailey SN (2009) Mastication and prescribed fire impacts on fuels in a 25-year old ponderosa pine plantation, southern Sierra Nevada Forest. Ecology and Management 258, 2365–2372.
Mastication and prescribed fire impacts on fuels in a 25-year old ponderosa pine plantation, southern Sierra Nevada Forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Reinhardt E, Crookston NL (2003) The Fire and Fuels Extension to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-116. (Ogden, UT)

Reinhardt ED, Keane RE, Calkin DE, Cohen JD (2008) Objectives and considerations for wildland fuel treatment in forested ecosystems of the interior western United States Forest. Ecology and Management 256, 1997–2006.
Objectives and considerations for wildland fuel treatment in forested ecosystems of the interior western United States Forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Safford HD, Van de Water KM (2014) Using Fire Return Interval Departure (FRID) analysis to map spatial and temporal changes in fire frequency on National Forest lands in California. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Station, Research Paper PSW-RP-266. (Albany, CA)

Safford HD, Stevens JT, Merriam K, Meyer MD, Latimer AM (2012) Fuel treatment effectiveness in California yellow pine and mixed-conifer forests. Forest Ecology and Management 274, 17–28.
Fuel treatment effectiveness in California yellow pine and mixed-conifer forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schultz CA, Jedd T, Beam RD (2012) The Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program: a history and overview of the first projects. Journal of Forestry 110, 381–391.
The Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program: a history and overview of the first projects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schultz CA, Coelho DL, Beam RD (2014) Design and governance of multiparty monitoring under the USDA Forest Service’s Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program. Journal of Forestry 112, 198–206.

Scott JH, Reinhardt ED (2001) Assessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behavior. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-RP-29. (Fort Collins, CO)

Stephens SL, Moghaddas JJ (2005) Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted mortality in a California mixed conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 215, 21–36.
Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted mortality in a California mixed conifer forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stephens SL, Moghaddas JJ, Edminster C, Fiedler CE, Haase S, Harrington M, Keeley JE, Knapp EE, McIver JD, Metlen K, Skinner CN, Youngblood A (2009) Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western US forests. Ecological Applications 19, 305–320.
Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western US forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19323192PubMed |

Stephens SL, Collins BM, Roller G (2012) Fuel treatment longevity in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 285, 204–212.
Fuel treatment longevity in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stephens SL, Agee JK, Fulé PZ, North MP, Romme WH, Swetnam TW (2013) Managing forest and fire in changing climates. Science 342, 41–42.
Managing forest and fire in changing climates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhsF2jtrjE&md5=4bf029d6d93bee5a09b39aa25c4d2483CAS | 24092714PubMed |

Sugihara NG, van Wagtendonk JW, Fites-Kaufman J (2006) Fire as an ecological process. In ‘Fire in California’s Ecosystems’. (Eds NG Sugihara, JW van Wagtendonk, KE Shaffer, J Fites-Kaufman, AE Thode) pp. 58–74. (University of California: Berkeley, CA)

US Department of Agriculture and US Department of the Interior (USDA-USDI) (2001) A collaborative approach for reducing wildland fire risks to communities and the environment: 10-year comprehensive strategy. Report by USDA Forest Service and USDI. (Washington, DC) Available at: http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/resources/plan/documents/7-19-en.pdf [Verified 8 May 2014]

USDI National Park Service (2003) Fire Monitoring Handbook. USDI Park Service Internal Document (Boise, ID). Available at: http://www.nps.gov/fire/wildland-fire/resources/documents/fire-effects-monitoring-handbook.pdf [Verified 8 May 2014]

Vaillant NM, Fites-Kaufman J, Reiner AL, Noonan-Wright EK, Dailey SN (2009a) Effect of fuel treatment on fuels and potential fire behavior in California, USA, National Forests. Fire Ecology 5, 14–29.
Effect of fuel treatment on fuels and potential fire behavior in California, USA, National Forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Vaillant NM, Fites-Kaufman J, Stephens SL (2009b) Effectiveness of prescribed fire as a fuel treatment in Californian coniferous forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 165–175.
Effectiveness of prescribed fire as a fuel treatment in Californian coniferous forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van de Water KM, Safford H (2011) A summary of fire frequency estimates for California vegetation before Euro-American settlement. Fire Ecology 7, 26–58.
A summary of fire frequency estimates for California vegetation before Euro-American settlement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Mantgem PJ, Stephenson NL, Knapp E, Battles J, Keeley JE (2011) Long-term effects of prescribed fire on mixed-conifer forest structure in the Sierra Nevada, California. Forest Ecology and Management 261, 989–994.
Long-term effects of prescribed fire on mixed-conifer forest structure in the Sierra Nevada, California.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Wagner CE (1968) The line intersect method in forest fuel sampling. Forest Science 14, 20–26.

van Wagtendonk JW, Sydoriak CA (1987) Fuel accumulation rates after prescribed fires in Yosemite National Park. In ‘Proceedings, 9th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology’, 21–24 April 1987, San Diego, CA, American Meteorological Society, pp. 101–105 (Boston, MA).

van Wagtendonk JW, Benedict JM, Sydoriak WM (1996) Physical properties of woody fuel particles of Sierra Nevada conifers. International Journal of Wildland Fire 6, 117–123.
Physical properties of woody fuel particles of Sierra Nevada conifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Wagtendonk JW, Benedict JM, Sydoriak WM (1998) Fuelbed characteristics of Sierra Nevada conifers. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 13, 73–84.

VanWagner CE (1977) Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 7, 23–34.
Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Webster KM, Halpern CB (2010) Long-term vegetation responses to reintroduction and repeated use of fire in mixed-conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada. Ecosphere 1, art9
Long-term vegetation responses to reintroduction and repeated use of fire in mixed-conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313, 940–943.
Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XotFCitbo%3D&md5=5148f8496efb4e5e78e7ee6c837fd85bCAS | 16825536PubMed |

Wildland Fire Leadership Council (WFLC) (2014) National Action Plan: an implementation framework for the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. Available at: http://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/strategy/documents/strategy/NationalActionPlan_20140423.pdf [Verified 20 October 2014]

Wohlgemuth PM, Hubbert K, Arbaugh MJ (2006) Fire and physical environment interactions: soil, water and air. In ‘Fire in California’s Ecosystems’. (Eds NG Sugihara, JW van Wagtendonk, KE Shaffer, J Fites-Kaufman, AE Thode) pp. 75–93. (University of California: Berkeley, CA)

Youngblood A (2010) Thinning and burning in dry coniferous forests of the western United States: effectiveness in altering diameter distributions. Forest Science 56, 46–59.