Register      Login
International Journal of Wildland Fire International Journal of Wildland Fire Society
Journal of the International Association of Wildland Fire
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Fire severity estimation from space: a comparison of active and passive sensors and their synergy for different forest types

M. A. Tanase A C , R. Kennedy B and C. Aponte A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, 500 Yarra Boulevard, Richmond, Vic. 3121, Australia.

B College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-5503, USA.

C Corresponding author. Email: mihai.tanase@tma.ro

International Journal of Wildland Fire 24(8) 1062-1075 https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15059
Submitted: 26 November 2014  Accepted: 30 June 2015   Published: 31 August 2015

Abstract

Monitoring fire effects at landscape level is viable from remote sensing platforms providing repeatable and consistent measurements. Previous studies have estimated fire severity using optical and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sensors, but to our knowledge, none have compared their effectiveness. Our study carried out such a comparison by using change detection indices computed from pre- and post-fire Landsat and L-band space-borne SAR datasets to estimate fire severity for seven fires located on three continents. Such indices were related to field-estimated fire severity through empirical models, and their estimation accuracy was compared. Empirical models based on the joint use of optical and radar indices were also evaluated. The results showed that optic-based indices provided more accurate fire severity estimates. On average, overall accuracy increased from 61% (SAR) to 76% (optical) for high-biomass forests. For low-biomass forests (i.e. aboveground biomass levels below the L-band saturation point), radar indices provided comparable results; overall accuracy was only slightly lower when compared with optical indices (69% vs 73%). The joint use of optical and radar indices decreased the estimation error and reduced misclassification of unburned forest by 9% for eucalypt and 3% for coniferous forests.

Additional keywords: accuracy assessment, ALOS PALSAR, CBI, L-band, Landsat, radar, radar-optical synergy.


References

Allen JL, Sorbel B (2008) Assessing the differenced Normalized Burn Ratio’s ability to map burn severity in the boreal forest and tundra ecosystems of Alaska’s national parks. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 463–475.
Assessing the differenced Normalized Burn Ratio’s ability to map burn severity in the boreal forest and tundra ecosystems of Alaska’s national parks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Benyon RG, Lane PNJ (2013) Ground and satellite-based assessments of wet eucalypt forest survival and regeneration for predicting long-term hydrological responses to a large wildfire. Forest Ecology and Management 294, 197–207.
Ground and satellite-based assessments of wet eucalypt forest survival and regeneration for predicting long-term hydrological responses to a large wildfire.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boer MM, Macfarlane C, Norris J, Sadler RJ, Wallace J, Grierson PF (2008) Mapping burned areas and burn severity patterns in SW Australian eucalypt forest using remotely sensed changes in leaf area index. Remote Sensing of Environment 112, 4358–4369.
Mapping burned areas and burn severity patterns in SW Australian eucalypt forest using remotely sensed changes in leaf area index.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Kasischke ES, French NHF, Szeto LH, Kherkher CM (1994) Using ERS-1 SAR imagery to monitor variations in burn severity in an Alaskan fire-disturbed boreal forest ecosystem. In ‘Proceedings of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS ’04)’, 8–12 August 1994, Pasadena, CA. IEEE International, pp. 243–245. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=399093&tag=1 [Verified 30 July 2015]

Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Harrell PA, Kasischke ES, French NHF (1997) The detection and mapping of Alaskan wildfires using a spaceborne imaging radar system. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18, 355–373.
The detection and mapping of Alaskan wildfires using a spaceborne imaging radar system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Kasischke ES, Brunzell S, Mudd JP (2002) Mapping fire scars in global boreal forests using imaging radar data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23, 4211–4234.
Mapping fire scars in global boreal forests using imaging radar data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information–theoretic approach. (Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY).

Chavez PS (1988) An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data. Remote Sensing of Environment 24, 459–479.
An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cheal DC (2010) Growth stages and tolerable fire intervals for Victoria’s native vegetation datasets. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

Chuvieco E, Riaño D, Danson FM, Martín P (2006) Use of a radiative transfer model to simulate the postfire spectral response to burn severity. Journal of Geophysical Research 111, G04S09
Use of a radiative transfer model to simulate the postfire spectral response to burn severity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cocke AE, Fule PZ, Crouse JE (2005) Comparison of burn severity assessments using differenced normalized burn ratio and ground data. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14, 189–198.
Comparison of burn severity assessments using differenced normalized burn ratio and ground data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

de Santis A, Chuvieco E (2009) GeoCBI: a modified version of the Composite Burn Index to estimate burn severity for remote sensing applications. Remote Sensing of Environment 113, 554–562.
GeoCBI: a modified version of the Composite Burn Index to estimate burn severity for remote sensing applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dillon GK, Morgan P, Holden ZA (2011) Mapping the potential for severe fire in the Western United States. Fire Management Today 71, 1–28.

Dobson MC, Ulaby T, Le Toan T, Beaudoin A, Kasischke ES (1992) Dependence of radar backscatter on coniferous forest biomass. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 30, 412–415.
Dependence of radar backscatter on coniferous forest biomass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Eidenshink J, Schwind B, Brewer K, Zhu Z, Quayle B, Howard S (2007) A project for monitoring trends in burn severity. Fire Ecology 3, 3–21.
A project for monitoring trends in burn severity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Epting J, Verbyla D, Sorbel B (2005) Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+. Remote Sensing of Environment 96, 328–339.
Evaluation of remotely sensed indices for assessing burn severity in interior Alaska using Landsat TM and ETM+.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fedrigo M, Kasel S, Bennett LT, Roxburgh SH, Nitschke CR (2014) Carbon stocks in temperate forests of south-eastern Australia reflect large tree distribution and edaphic conditions. Forest Ecology and Management 334, 129–143.
Carbon stocks in temperate forests of south-eastern Australia reflect large tree distribution and edaphic conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ferrazzoli P, Paloscia S, Pampaloni P, Schiavon G, Sigismondi S, Solimini D (1997) The potential of multifrequency polarimetric SAR in assessing agricultural and arboreous biomass. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 35, 5–17.
The potential of multifrequency polarimetric SAR in assessing agricultural and arboreous biomass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Foody GM (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 80, 185–201.
Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

French NHF, Kasischke ES, Hall RJ, Murphy KA, Verbyla DL, Hoy EE, Allen JL (2008) Using Landsat data to assess fire and burn severity in the North American boreal forest region: an overview and summary of results. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 443–462.
Using Landsat data to assess fire and burn severity in the North American boreal forest region: an overview and summary of results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gallant JC, Dowling TI, Read AM, Wilson N, Tickle P, Inskeep C (2011) 1-second SRTM derived digital elevation models user guide. Geoscience Australia, National Earth Observation Group, Environmental Geoscience Division, Canberra. Available at www.ga.gov.au/topographic-mapping/digital-elevation-data.html [Verified 28 July 2015]

Hall RJ, Freeburn JT, de Groot WJ, Pritchard JM, Lynham TJ, Landry R (2008) Remote sensing of burn severity: experience from western Canada boreal fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 476–489.

Henry MC, Hope AS (1998) Monitoring post-burn recovery of chaparral vegetation in southern California using multi-temporal satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19, 3097–3107.
Monitoring post-burn recovery of chaparral vegetation in southern California using multi-temporal satellite data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Heward H, Smith AMS, Roy DP, Tinkham WT, Hoffman CM, Morgan P, Lannom KO (2013) Is burn severity related to fire intensity? Observations from landscape scale remote sensing. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22, 910–918.
Is burn severity related to fire intensity? Observations from landscape scale remote sensing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holden ZA, Morgan P, Smith AMS, Vierling L (2010) Beyond Landsat: a comparison of four satellite sensors for detecting burn severity in ponderosa pine forests of the Gila Wilderness, NM, USA. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 449–458.
Beyond Landsat: a comparison of four satellite sensors for detecting burn severity in ponderosa pine forests of the Gila Wilderness, NM, USA.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hoy EE, French NHF, Turetsky MR, Trigg SN, Kasischke ES (2008) Evaluating the potential of Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery for assessing fire severity in Alaskan black spruce forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 500–514.
Evaluating the potential of Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery for assessing fire severity in Alaskan black spruce forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kasischke E, Hoy EE (2012) Controls on carbon consumption during Alaskan wildland fires. Global Change Biology 18, 685–699.
Controls on carbon consumption during Alaskan wildland fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kasischke ES, Bourgeau-Chavez LL, French NHF, Harrell P, Christensen NL (1992) Initial observations on using SAR to monitor wildfire scars in boreal forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing 13, 3495–3501.
Initial observations on using SAR to monitor wildfire scars in boreal forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kasischke ES, Bourgeau-Chavez LL, French NHF (1994) Observations of variations in ERS-1 SAR image intensity associated with forest fires in Alaska. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 32, 206–210.
Observations of variations in ERS-1 SAR image intensity associated with forest fires in Alaska.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kasischke ES, Turetsky MR, Ottmar RD, French NHF, Hoy EE, Kane ES (2008) Evaluation of the composite burn index for assessing fire severity in Alaskan black spruce forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 515–526.
Evaluation of the composite burn index for assessing fire severity in Alaskan black spruce forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kasischke ES, Tanase MA, Bourgeau-Chavez LL, Borr M (2011) Soil moisture limitations on monitoring boreal forest regrowth using spaceborne L-band SAR data. Remote Sensing of Environment 115, 227–232.
Soil moisture limitations on monitoring boreal forest regrowth using spaceborne L-band SAR data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keeley JE (2009) Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 116–126.
Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Keeley JE, Brennan T, Pfaff AH (2008) Fire severity and ecosystem responses following crown fires in California shrublands. Ecological Applications 18, 1530–1546.
Fire severity and ecosystem responses following crown fires in California shrublands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18767627PubMed |

Key CH (2006) Ecological and sampling constraints on defining landscape fire severity. Fire Ecology 2, 34–59.
Ecological and sampling constraints on defining landscape fire severity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Key CH, Benson NC (2006) Landscape assessment (LA) sampling and analysis methods. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-164-CD. (Fort Collins, CO)

Kolden CA, Lutz JA, Key CH, Kane JT, Wagtendonk JW (2012) Mapped versus actual burned area within wildfire perimeters: characterizing the unburned. Forest Ecology and Management 286, 38–47.
Mapped versus actual burned area within wildfire perimeters: characterizing the unburned.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Landmann T (2003) Characterizing sub-pixel Landsat ETM+ fire severity on experimental fires in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. South African Journal of Science 99, 357–359.

Le Toan T, Beaudoin A, Guyon D (1992) Relating forest biomass to SAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 30, 403–411.
Relating forest biomass to SAR data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lentile LB, Holden ZA, Smith AMS, Falkowski MJ, Hudak AT, Morgan P, Lewis SA, Gessler PE, Benson NC (2006) Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects. International Journal of Wildland Fire 15, 319–345.
Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Liang S, Fang H, Morisette JT, Chen M, Shuey CJ, Walthall CL, Daughtry CST (2002) Atmospheric correction of Landsat ETM+ land surface imagery: II. validation and applications. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 40, 2736–2746.
Atmospheric correction of Landsat ETM+ land surface imagery: II. validation and applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

López-García MJ, Caselles V (1991) Mapping burns and natural reforestation using Thematic Mapper data. Geocarto International 6, 31–37.
Mapping burns and natural reforestation using Thematic Mapper data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Masek JG, Vermote EF, Saleous NE, Wolfe R, Hall FG, Huemmrich KF, Gao F, Kutler J, Lim T-K (2006) A Landsat surface reflectance dataset for North America, 1990–2000. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 3, 68–72.
A Landsat surface reflectance dataset for North America, 1990–2000.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McDonald KC, Dobson MC, Ulaby FT (1990) Using MIMICS to model L-Band multiangle and multitemporal backscatter from a walnut orchard. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 28, 477–491.
Using MIMICS to model L-Band multiangle and multitemporal backscatter from a walnut orchard.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Menges CH, Bartolo RE, Bell D, Hill GJE (2004) The effect of savanna fires on SAR backscatter in northern Australia. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25, 4857–4871.
The effect of savanna fires on SAR backscatter in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miles PD 2014. Forest Inventory EVALIDator web-application version 1.6.0.01. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station (St. Paul, MN). Available only on internet at http://apps.fs.fed.us/ Evalidator/evalidator.jsp [Verified 28 July 2015]

Miller JD, Thode AE (2007) Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR). Remote Sensing of Environment 109, 66–80.
Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Miller JD, Yool SR (2002) Mapping forest post-fire canopy consumption in several overstory types using multi-temporal Landsat TM and ETM data. Remote Sensing of Environment 82, 481–496.
Mapping forest post-fire canopy consumption in several overstory types using multi-temporal Landsat TM and ETM data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Montealegre AL, Lamelas MT, Tanase MA, de la Riva J (2014) Forest fire severity assessment using ALS data in a Mediterranean environment. Remote Sensing 6, 4240–4265.
Forest fire severity assessment using ALS data in a Mediterranean environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Murphy KA, Reynolds JH, Koltun JM (2008) Evaluating the ability of the differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) to predict ecologically significant burn severity in Alaskan boreal forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 490–499.
Evaluating the ability of the differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) to predict ecologically significant burn severity in Alaskan boreal forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) ‘Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Riaño D, Chuvieco E, Ustin S, Zomer R, Dennison P, Roberts D, Salas J (2002) Assessment of vegetation regeneration after fire through multitemporal analysis of AVIRIS images in the Santa Monica Mountains. Remote Sensing of Environment 79, 60–71.
Assessment of vegetation regeneration after fire through multitemporal analysis of AVIRIS images in the Santa Monica Mountains.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rignot E, Despain DG, Holecz F (1999) The 1988 Yellowstone fires observed by imaging radars. In ‘Proceedings of the Joint Fire Sciences Conference and Workshop’, 15–17 June 1999, Boise, ID. University of Idaho and the International Journal of Wildland Fire, pp. 1–9

Roy DP, Boschetti L, Trigg SN (2006) Remote sensing of fire severity: assessing the performance of the normalized burn ratio. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 3, 112–116.
Remote sensing of fire severity: assessing the performance of the normalized burn ratio.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Saich P, Rees WG, Borgeaud M (1999) Mapping and monitoring forest destruction in the Kola Peninsula using the ERS SAR. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 4, 2098–2100.
Mapping and monitoring forest destruction in the Kola Peninsula using the ERS SAR.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schwarz GE (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6, 461–464.
Estimating the dimension of a model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shimada M, Isoguchi O, Tadono T, Isono K (2009) PALSAR radiometric and geometric calibration. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 47, 3915–3932.
PALSAR radiometric and geometric calibration.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Siegert F, Hoffmann AA (2000) The 1998 forest fires in East Kalimantan (Indonesia): a quantitative evaluation using high resolution, multitemporal ERS-2 SAR images and NOAA-AVHRR hotspot data. Remote Sensing of Environment 72, 64–77.
The 1998 forest fires in East Kalimantan (Indonesia): a quantitative evaluation using high resolution, multitemporal ERS-2 SAR images and NOAA-AVHRR hotspot data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Siegert F, Nakayama M (2000) Comparison of ERS-2 and JERS for fire impact assessment in tropical rainforests. In ‘Proceedings of the Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS ’00)’, 24–28 July, Honolulu, HI. Volume 6, pp. 2709–2711. (IEEE International: Honolulu, HI)

Siegert F, Rucker G, Hoffman A (1999) Evaluation of the 1998 forest fires in East-Kalimantan (Indonesia) using NOAA-AVHRR hotspot data and multitemporal ERS-2 SAR images. In ‘Proceedings of the Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS ’99)’, 28 June–2 July, Hamburg, 1999. Pp. 185–187 (IEEE International: Hamburg, Germany)

Sikkink PG, Dillon GK, Keane RE, Morgan P, Karau EC, Holden ZA, Silverstein RP (2013). Composite Burn Index (CBI) data and field photos collected for the FIRESEV project, western United States. (Fort Collins, CO)10.2737/RDS-2013-0017

Smith AMS, Wooster MJ, Drake NA, Dipotso FM, Falkowski MJ, Hudak AT (2005) Testing the potential of multi-spectral remote sensing for retrospectively estimating fire severity in African savannahs. Remote Sensing of Environment 97, 92–115.
Testing the potential of multi-spectral remote sensing for retrospectively estimating fire severity in African savannahs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sparks AM, Boschetti L, Smith AMS, Tinkham WT, Lannom KO, Newingham BA (2015) An accuracy assessment of the MTBS burned area product for shrub–steppe fires in the northern Great Basin, United States. International Journal of Wildland Fire 24, 70–78.
An accuracy assessment of the MTBS burned area product for shrub–steppe fires in the northern Great Basin, United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stehman SV (1997) Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sensing of Environment 62, 77–89.
Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tanase MA, de la Riva J, Pérez-Cabello F (2011) Estimating burn severity at the regional level using optically based indices. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41, 863–872.

Tanase MA, de la Riva J, Santoro M, Le Toan T, Perez-Cabello F (2010a) Sensitivity of X-, C- and L-band SAR backscatter to fire severity in Mediterranean pine forests. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 48, 3663–3675.
Sensitivity of X-, C- and L-band SAR backscatter to fire severity in Mediterranean pine forests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tanase MA, Santoro M, de la Riva J, Kasischke E, Korets MA (2010b) L-band SAR backscatter prospects for burn severity estimation in boreal forests. In ‘ESA Living Planet Symposium’, 28 June–2 July, Bergen, Norway. ESA Publications Division, SP-686, pp. 1–6. (Bergen, Norway)

Tanase MA, Santoro M, Wegmüller U, de la Riva J, Perez-Cabello F (2010c) Properties of X-, C- and L-band repeat-pass interferometric SAR coherence in Mediterranean pine forests affected by fires. Remote Sensing of Environment 114, 2182–2194.
Properties of X-, C- and L-band repeat-pass interferometric SAR coherence in Mediterranean pine forests affected by fires.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tanase MA, Santoro M, Aponte C, de la Riva J (2014) Polarimetric properties of burned forest areas at C- and L-band. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observation and Remote Sensing 7, 267–276.
Polarimetric properties of burned forest areas at C- and L-band.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thanos CA, Daskalakou E, Nikolaidou S (1996) Early post-fire regeneration of a Pinus halepensis forest on Mount Parnis, Greece. Journal of Vegetation Science 7, 273–280.
Early post-fire regeneration of a Pinus halepensis forest on Mount Parnis, Greece.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Turner MG, Tinker DB, Romme WH, Kashian DM, Litton CM (2004) Landscape patterns of sapling density, leaf area, and aboveground net primary production in postfire lodgepole pine forests, Yellowstone National Park (USA). Ecosystems 7, 751–775.
Landscape patterns of sapling density, leaf area, and aboveground net primary production in postfire lodgepole pine forests, Yellowstone National Park (USA).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Der Meer PJ, Dignan P, Saveneh AG (1999) Effect of gap size on seedling establishment, growth and survival at three years in mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell.) forest in Victoria, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 117, 33–42.
Effect of gap size on seedling establishment, growth and survival at three years in mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell.) forest in Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Der Werf GR, Randerson JT, Giglio L, Collatz GJ, Kasibhatla PS, Arellano AF (2006) Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 6, 3423–3441.
Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtV2hs7nI&md5=c83e1c4466e60552bb66551c499af84cCAS |

Van Wagtendonk JW, Root RR, Key CH (2004) Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity. Remote Sensing of Environment 92, 397–408.
Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Verbyla DL, Kasischke ES, Hoy EE (2008) Seasonal and topographic effects on estimating fire severity from Landsat TM/ETM+ data. International Journal of Wildland Fire 17, 527–534.
Seasonal and topographic effects on estimating fire severity from Landsat TM/ETM+ data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Viedma MJ, Segarra D, Garcia-Haro J (1997) Modeling rates of ecosystem recovery after fires by using Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment 61, 383–398.
Modeling rates of ecosystem recovery after fires by using Landsat TM data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang C, Glenn NF (2009) Estimation of fire severity using pre- and post-fire LiDAR data in sagebrush steppe rangelands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18, 848–856.
Estimation of fire severity using pre- and post-fire LiDAR data in sagebrush steppe rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wegmüller U, Werner C, Strozzi T, Wiesmann A (2002) Automated and precise image registration procedures. In ‘Analysis of Multi-temporal Remote Sensing Images.’ (Eds L Bruzzone, P Smits.) Vol. 2 pp. 37–49. (World Scientific: Singapore)

Wimberly MC, Reilly MJ (2007) Assessment of fire severity and species diversity in the southern Appalachians using Landsat TM and ETM+ imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 108, 189–197.
Assessment of fire severity and species diversity in the southern Appalachians using Landsat TM and ETM+ imagery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |