CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Marine & Freshwater Research   
Marine & Freshwater Research
  Advances in the Aquatic Sciences
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Referee Guidelines
Early Career Referee Mentoring
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 56(6)

Measuring fragmentation of seagrass landscapes: which indices are most appropriate for detecting change?

Jai C. Sleeman A, Gary A. Kendrick B, Guy S. Boggs A, Bruce J. Hegge C

A Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0909, Australia.
B School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
C Oceanica Marine and Estuarine Specialists, 99 Broadway, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: jai.sleeman@cdu.edu.au
 
PDF (973 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Many indices are available for assessment of spatial patterns in landscape ecology, yet there is presently no consensus about which ones effectively quantify habitat fragmentation. Research that has been carried out to date has evaluated indices primarily using computer-simulated models of terrestrial environments, but how they perform when applied to real landscapes, particularly in the marine environment, has received little attention. Eleven indices that are commonly used for quantifying habitat fragmentation were assessed for their abilities to measure different levels of fragmentation in 16-ha landscape windows of mapped seagrass. The landscape windows were grouped into five categories, from highly fragmented to continuous seagrass landscapes. Nested within the fragmentation categories were high and low levels of seagrass cover. Hierarchical analysis of variance techniques were used to differentiate between the different fragmentation categories and levels of seagrass cover within the fragmentation categories. Principal component analysis was also employed to determine strong correlations between the indices. The results suggest that (1) landscape division and (2) area-weighted mean perimeter to area ratio were the most appropriate indices for differentiating between independent levels of seagrass fragmentation. The splitting index may also be useful when the detection of small differences in cover is important.

Keywords: habitat fragmentation, indices, landscapes, metrics, patchiness, seagrass.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012