Biochemical systematics of the marine fish family Centrolophidae (Teleostei:Stromateoidei) from Australian waters
CJS Bolch, RD Ward and PR Last
Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 45(7) 1157 - 1172
Abstract The phylogenetic relationships of 11 stromateoid species (nine from the Family Centrolophidae and one
each from the Nomeidae and Tetragonuridae) were examined by allozyme electrophoresis. Data from 30
loci were used for three phylogenetic analyses. Two phenetic trees were derived: a UPGMA tree derived
from Nei's unbiased genetic distance, and a distance-Wagner tree based on modified Rogers' distances.
A cladistic analysis, using maximum parsimony, was also carried out with loci as characters and alleles as
unordered states.
The tree topology of all three analyses showed a high degree of similarity, which increased confidence
in the phylogenetic interpretation and generally supported the classical taxonomic theory of centrolophid
relationships. The 'hard-spined' centrolophid taxa, including Seriolella, Psenopsis, Schedophilus
labyrinthicus and Hyperoglyphe, formed a stable group In all trees. Psenopsis was closely allied to
Seriolella in all three analyses, which supports the view that this genus is derived from Seriolella.
Centrolophus and Tubbia consistently diverged from the ancestral line of taxa near the base of the tree, so
may have diverged from ancestral stock earlier than previously thought. The most striking departure from
current taxonomic theory was the wide separation of Schedophilus labyrinthicus and Schedophilus
huttoni, indicating that the genus Schedophilus is polyphyletic. A revision of the genus is needed and
should include morphological and electrophoretic analyses of all Schedophilus species, with particular
reference to the type species S. medusophagus.
Keywords: allozymes, isozymes, genetic diversity, phylogeny, systematics, Centrolophidae, Stromateoidei, Teleostei
Full text doi:10.1071/MF9941157
© CSIRO 1994





Early Alert
Connect with us





