CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > PASA   
PASA
  Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
Call for Proposals
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

Training

Publication Workshops


 

Article     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 23(4)

Mathematical Morphology: Star/Galaxy Differentiation & Galaxy Morphology Classification

Jason A. Moore A B, Kevin A. Pimbblet A, Michael J. Drinkwater A

A Department of Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
B Corresponding author. E-mail: jmoore@physics.uq.edu.au
 
 Full Text
 PDF (1 MB)
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

We present an application of Mathematical Morphology (MM) for the classification of astronomical objects, both for star/galaxy differentiation and galaxy morphology classification. We demonstrate that, for CCD images, 99.3 ± 3.8% of galaxies can be separated from stars using MM, with 19.4 ± 7.9% of the stars being misclassified. We demonstrate that, for photographic plate images, the number of galaxies correctly separated from the stars can be increased using our MM diffraction spike tool, which allows 51.0 ± 6.0% of the high-brightness galaxies that are inseparable in current techniques to be correctly classified, with only 1.4 ± 0.5% of the high-brightness stars contaminating the population. We demonstrate that elliptical (E) and late-type spiral (Sc-Sd) galaxies can be classified using MM with an accuracy of 91.4 ± 7.8%. It is a method involving fewer ‘free parameters’ than current techniques, especially automated machine learning algorithms. The limitation of MM galaxy morphology classification based on seeing and distance is also presented. We examine various star/galaxy differentiation and galaxy morphology classification techniques commonly used today, and show that our MM techniques compare very favourably.

Keywords: techniques: image processingmethods: data analysismethods: miscellaneous


   
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012