CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Wildlife Research   
Wildlife Research
  Ecology, Management and Conservation in Natural and Modified Habitats
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 CSIRO Wildlife Research
All volumes of CSIRO Wildlife Research are online and available to subscribers of Wildlife Research.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 32(4)

A comparison of three trap designs for capturing brown treesnakes on Guam

Daniel S. Vice A, Richard M. Engeman B, Diane L. Vice A C

A United States Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, 1060 Route 16, Suite 103C, Barrigada Heights, GU 96913, USA.
B National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
C Current Address: Guam Department of Agriculture, Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources, 192 Dairy Road, Mangilao, GU 96923, USA.
 
PDF (146 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

The accidental introduction of the brown treesnake (Boiga irregularis) to Guam has resulted in the extirpation of most native terrestrial vertebrates on the island, thousands of power outages, and significant ecological changes. In addition, Guam now serves as a source population for the dispersal of snakes to other islands. Control of the brown treesnake is dependent upon the use of traps in a variety of settings, including port environments and in forested habitat. A variety of snake traps have been used on Guam; most consist of a modified crawfish or minnow trap, housing a live mouse that serves as a lure. We compared the efficacy of three trap styles: (1) a two-piece design with a separate internal mouse chamber; (2) a one-piece trap, with design improvements aimed at decreasing handling; and (3) the same one-piece trap, fitted with a PVC-coated wire-mesh entrance flap. Data collected included snake capture rates, snake size distribution, mouse survival, and trap maintenance time. Snake capture rates did not differ between the one-piece and the two-piece traps, although capture rates were significantly lower in the PVC-flap traps. The average snake size or distribution of snake sizes did not differ between the one-piece and two-piece traps. Handling times, both with and without a snake in the trap, were significantly lower for the one-piece trap. Mouse survival did not differ between the one-piece and two-piece trap styles. Our results indicate that the modified one-piece trap design provides several advantages over previous trap designs.

   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012