Electric Fences and Poison Buffers as Barriers to Movements and Dispersal of Brushtail Possums (Trichosurus Vulpecula) on Farmland.
PE Cowan and DS Rhodes
Wildlife Research 20(5) 671 - 686
Abstract
Limitation of the spread of bovine tuberculosis by brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) in New
Zealand involves creating buffer zones 3-5km wide around areas where the disease is endemic in
possum populations; low possum density is established by aerial and ground poisoning and maintained
by repeated control. The effectiveness of a buffer zone was examined using live-trapping and radiotracking
to study movements and dispersal of juvenile and adult possums in comparison with a nearby,
undisturbed (control) site. At a third site, the effect of a 3-km long, 9-strand electric fence, erected
from ridge to ridge across a valley catchment, for reducing possum dispersal was measured, as an
alternative to a buffer zone.
Adult possums were highly sedentary; only one permanent shift of more than 0.5km was detected
during repeated live-trapping and radio-tracking, and most consecutive live captures were in traps
less than 200m apart. None of the radio-tagged adults adjacent to the poison buffer zones moved
permanently into the low-density areas. By contrast, about 20% of radio-tagged juveniles dispersed more
than 0.5km, moving up to 11.6km from their natal areas, most in a generally west-north-west to
east-north-east direction. About equal numbers dispersed upstream, downstream, or in other directions.
Significantly more males dispersed than females, but their dispersal distances were similar. Some
dispersing possums moved more than 2km overnight, and females, particularly, often made several
moves before settling. Most juveniles dispersed before they were one year old, mainly in the three
months immediately preceding the peak of births in autumn. Neither the poison buffer zone nor the
electric fence appeared to influence the proportion of juveniles that dispersed more than 0.5km,
or the average distance dispersed. The implications of these findings in preventing the spread of bovine
tuberculosis are discussed.
Full text doi:10.1071/WR9930671
© CSIRO 1993





Early Alert
Connect with us





