CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Australian Systematic Botany   
Australian Systematic Botany
  Taxonomy, Biogeography & Evolution of Plants
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
LAS Johnson Review Series
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Brunonia
Brunonia, the predecessor journal to Australian Systematic Botany, is available online.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 20(1)

Molecular taxonomic clarification of Ptilotus exaltatus and Ptilotus nobilis (Amaranthaceae)

Kok K. Lee A, Dion K. Harrison A, Margaret E. Johnston A B, Richard R. Williams A

A Centre for Native Floriculture, School of Land, Crop and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld 4343, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: M.Johnston@uq.edu.au
 
PDF (1.9 MB) $25
 Supplementary Material
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

A complete botanical key for the genus Ptilotus R.Brown (family Amarathaceae) has not yet been published. Identifying the 100 or more Ptilotus species using morphological characters has been difficult because plants often exhibit slight morphological differences and intermediate characteristics common to several species, subspecies, varieties and forms. Ptilotus exaltatus Nees and P. nobilis (Lindl) F.Muell share many morphological characteristics, but are classified as different species predominantly based on inflorescence colour. The current study involved a molecular phylogenetic analysis of 14 Ptilotus species using sequence data from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions ITS 1 and ITS 2 within the 18S–26S nuclear rDNA. Of the 39 accessions analysed, all except those identified as P. exaltatus and P. nobilis clustered according to their respective species based on their morphological taxonomy. In contrast, all 18 P. exaltatus and P. nobilis accessions formed a distinct monophyletic clade with 99% bootstrap values and a low level of sequence variation (GD = 0.002). Taking into account the lack of reliable morphological characters for separating P. exaltatus and P. nobilis, together with the ITS sequence data showing little genetic divergence or genetic structure, we propose that P. exaltatus and P. nobilis are conspecific.

   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012