CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Sexual Health
  An interdisciplinary journal of sexual health including HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections
You are here: Journals > Sexual Health   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Committee
Editorial Contacts
Sites of Interest
Print Publication Dates
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
For Advertisers
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Monitoring inequalities in the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: added value of ACORN, a commercial geodemographic classification tool

Jessica Sheringham A D, Sarah Sowden A, Mai Stafford B, Ian Simms C and Rosalind Raine A

A Health Care Evaluation Group, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1–19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
B Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
C HIV and STI Department, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London, NW9 5EQ, UK.
D Corresponding author. Email: j.sheringham@ucl.ac.uk


Abstract

Background: Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexual health service use is needed to ensure equitable service provision. There are limitations to current methods, particularly when applied to young people. The present study examined the validity and added value of combining ACORN, a commercial tool, with an established deprivation index to improve monitoring of inequalities in the National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP) in England. Methods: ACORN categories and the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 (IMD 2004) quintiles were linked to England population estimates and 145 975 records from the NCSP. Results: ACORN’s validity was demonstrated by moderate agreement between IMD 2004 and ACORN in segmenting the population and consistent gradients in the relative risk of chlamydia positivity between the most and least deprived areas assessed by IMD 2004 (relative risk (RR) 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23, 1.40) and ACORN (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.25, 1.40). ACORN’s fine level of geographic resolution demonstrated that the NCSP was reaching the most deprived neighbourhoods within larger areas classified overall as deprived by IMD 2004. Within the most deprived IMD 2004 quintile, areas classified as most deprived by ACORN had higher chlamydia screening coverage (3.15%; 95% CI 3.11, 3.19%) than the least deprived (1.81%; 95% CI 1.56, 2.08%). Furthermore, ACORN identified highest screening coverage (9.2%) in areas classified as ‘communal housing.’ Conclusions: These findings illustrate that a commercial geodemographic tool in combination with an established deprivation index may overcome limitations in monitoring inequalities in sexual health service use. ACORN had value as a supplementary deprivation marker for monitoring inequalities in chlamydia screening in England.

Keywords: demographics, health status disparities, mass screening, socioeconomic factors.

Sexual Health 6(1) 57–62    doi:10.1071/SH08036
Submitted: 15 May 2008    Accepted: 8 September 2008    Published: 23 February 2009





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
Full Text
PDF (233 KB)
Export Citation
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010