Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Does place of service matter? A utilisation and cost analysis of sexually transmissible infection testing from 2012 claims data

Kwame Owusu-Edusei Jr A B , Chirag G. Patel A and Thomas L. Gift A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road MS E-80, Atlanta, GA30333, USA.

B Corresponding author. Email: Kowusuedusei@cdc.gov

Sexual Health 13(2) 131-139 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH15066
Submitted: 31 March 2015  Accepted: 2 November 2015   Published: 18 January 2016

Abstract

Background: In this study, a previous study on the utilisation and cost of sexually transmissible infection (STI) tests was augmented by focusing on outpatient place of service for the most utilised tests. Methods: Claims for eight STI tests [chlamydia, gonorrhoea, hepatitis B virus (HBV), HIV, human papillomavirus (HPV), herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV2), syphilis and trichomoniasis] using the most utilised current procedural terminology (CPT) code for each STI from the 2012 MarketScan outpatient table were extracted. The volume and costs by gender and place of service were then summarised. Finally, semi-log regression analyses were used to further examine and compare costs. Results: Females had a higher number of test claims than males in all places of service for each STI. Together, claims from ‘Independent Laboratories’, ‘Office’ and ‘Outpatient hospital’ accounted for over 93% of all the test claims. The cost of tests were slightly (<5%) different between males and females for most places of service. Except for the estimated average cost for ‘Outpatient hospital’, the estimated average costs for the other categories were significantly lower (15–80%, P < 0.01) than the estimated average cost for ‘Emergency Room – Hospital’ for all the STIs. Among the predominant service venues, test costs from ‘Independent Laboratory’ and ‘Office’ were 30% to 69% lower (P < 0.01) than those from ‘Outpatient Hospital’. Conclusions: Even though the results from this study are not generalisable, our study shows that almost all STI tests from outpatient claims data were performed in three service venues with considerable cost variations.


References

[1]  Satterwhite CL, Torrone E, Meitis E, Dunne EF, Mahajan R, Ocfemia MCB, Su J, Xu F, Weinstock H. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40 187–93.
Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23403598PubMed |

[2]  Owusu-Edusei K, Chesson HW, Gift TL, Tao G, Mahajan R, Ocfemia MC, Kent CK. The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States, 2008. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40 197–201.
The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States, 2008.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23403600PubMed |

[3]  Workowski KA, Berman S. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010; 59 1–110.
| 21160459PubMed |

[4]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae–2014. MMWR Recomm Rep 2014; 63 1–19.
| 25254666PubMed |

[5]  Owusu-Edusei K, Nguyen HT, Gift TL. Utilization and cost of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infection screening among insured American youth, 2008. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40 354–61.
Utilization and cost of diagnostic methods for sexually transmitted infection screening among insured American youth, 2008.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23588123PubMed |

[6]  Truven Health Analytics. Marketscan research database: user guide and database dictionary. Ann Arbor: Truven Health Analytics; 2012.

[7]  Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Place of Service Code Set. Database on the internet. 2012. Available online at: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/place-of-service-codes/Place_of_Service_Code_Set.html [verified 10 December 2014].

[8]  Owusu-Edusei K, Flagg EW, Gift TL. Hospitalization cost per case of neonatal herpes simplex virus infection from claims data. J Pediatr Nurs 2015; 30 346–52.
| 25193688PubMed |

[9]  Owusu-Edusei K, Introcaso CE, Chesson HW. Hospitalization cost of congenital syphilis diagnosis from insurance claims data in the United States. Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40 226–9.
Hospitalization cost of congenital syphilis diagnosis from insurance claims data in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23407468PubMed |

[10]  Thygeson M, Van Vorst KA, Maciosek MV, Solberg L. Use and costs of care in retail clinics versus traditional care sites. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 27 1283–92.
Use and costs of care in retail clinics versus traditional care sites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18780912PubMed |

[11]  Williams RM. The costs of visits to emergency departments. N Engl J Med 1996; 334 642–6.
The costs of visits to emergency departments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK287nt1yqtg%3D%3D&md5=9e608fd8485b66be22cd04aac3336625CAS | 8592529PubMed |

[12]  Mehrotra A, Liu H, Adams JL, Wang MC, Lave JR, Thygeson NM, Solberg LF, McGlynn EA. Comparing costs and quality of care at retail clinics with that of other medical settings for 3 common illnesses. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151 321–8.
Comparing costs and quality of care at retail clinics with that of other medical settings for 3 common illnesses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19721020PubMed |

[13]  Kennedy P. A guide to econometrics, 6th edn. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.

[14]  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2013. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.

[15]  Owusu-Edusei K, Bohm MK, Chesson HW, Kent CK. Chlamydia screening and pelvic inflammatory disease: insights from exploratory time-series analyses. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38 652–7.
Chlamydia screening and pelvic inflammatory disease: insights from exploratory time-series analyses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20494242PubMed |

[16]  Berenson RA, Ginsburg PB, Christianson JB, Yee T. The growing power of some providers to win steep payment increases from insurers suggests policy remedies may be needed. Health Aff 2012; 31 973–81.
The growing power of some providers to win steep payment increases from insurers suggests policy remedies may be needed.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Henderson T, Shepheard J, Sundararajan V. Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 2006; 44 1011–9.
Quality of diagnosis and procedure coding in ICD-10 administrative data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17063133PubMed |

[18]  Peabody JW, Luck J, Jain S, Bertenthal D, Glassman P. Assessing the accuracy of administrative data in health information systems. Med Care 2004; 42 1066–72.
Assessing the accuracy of administrative data in health information systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15586833PubMed |

[19]  Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Revised and clarified place of service (POS) coding instructions. Baltimore: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2013.

[20]  Golden MR, Kerndt PR. Improving clinical operations: can we and should we save our STD clinics? Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37 264–5.
| 20182405PubMed |

[21]  Owusu-Edusei K, Doshi SR. County-level sexually transmitted disease detection and control in Texas: do sexually transmitted diseases and family planning clinics matter? Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38 970–5.
County-level sexually transmitted disease detection and control in Texas: do sexually transmitted diseases and family planning clinics matter?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21934575PubMed |

[22]  Adamson DM, Chang S, Hansen LG. Health research data for the real world: the MarketScan databases. White Paper. Ann Arbour, MI: Thomson Healthcare; 2006: 1–32.