CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Environmental Chemistry   
Environmental Chemistry
  Environmental problems - Chemical approaches
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Boards
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
Covers
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 5(6)

Tolerance of two perennial grasses to toxic levels of Ni2+

Peter. M. Kopittke A B C, Colin. J. Asher A, F. Pax. C. Blamey A B, Neal. W. Menzies A B

A The University of Queensland, School of Land, Crop and Food Sciences, St. Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
B Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC-CARE), The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: p.kopittke@uq.edu.au
 
PDF (613 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  

Environmental context. Nickel (Ni) may be present in soil at phytotoxic levels as a result of weathering of ultramafic (serpentine) minerals or activities such as mining and metal ore processing. We assessed the tolerance of two grasses to excess Ni and used electron microscopy to examine the distribution of the Ni within the root tissue. This study provides information on the influence of excess Ni on the growth of these two grasses with consideration to their suitability for the revegetation of areas contaminated with Ni.

Abstract. Toxic effects of Nickel (Ni) in solution were evaluated in signal grass and Rhodes grass, two species commonly used for the revegetation of contaminated sites in the tropics and sub-tropics. Both grasses had a similar response to Ni, a Ni2+ activity ({Ni2+}) of 14 × 10–6 M, which reduced the fresh mass by 50%. The sub-cellular distribution of Ni in the roots was similar for both species, with Ni accumulating primarily as particles <5 nm in the vacuoles of rhizodermal and outer cortical cells. The reduction in growth at elevated {Ni2+} caused a loss of apical dominance in the roots and a Ni-induced Fe deficiency in the shoots. Root hair growth was not reduced by Ni2+ toxicity and was prolific even at the highest {Ni2+} (35 × 10–6 M). The translocation of Ni to the plant tops of both grasses resulted in concentrations that exceeded the guidelines for Ni toxicity to grazing animals (100 μg g–1) when grown with ≥11 × 10–6 M {Ni2+} in solution.

Keywords: Ni distribution, Ni phytotoxicity, shoot and root growth, symptoms.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012