CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > The Rangeland Journal   
The Rangeland Journal
  Rangeland Ecology & Management
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Structure
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Contributors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
Referee Guidelines
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

Now Online

Land Resources Surveys


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 31(3)

Sharing Skippy: how can landholders be involved in kangaroo production in Australia?

Rosie Cooney A C, Alex Baumber A, Peter Ampt A, George Wilson B

A Fate Program, Institute of Environmental Studies, Vallentine Annexe, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia.
B Australian Wildlife Services, 51 Stonehaven Crescent, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: rosie.cooney@unsw.edu.au
 
PDF (191 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

For 2 decades, calls for Australian rangeland landholders to expand their reliance on the abundant species of native kangaroos and decrease their reliance on introduced stock have been made. These calls have received recent impetus from the challenge of climate change. Arguments for landholder involvement in kangaroo production include reduced greenhouse gas emissions, better management of total grazing pressure, reduced land degradation, improved vegetation and biodiversity outcomes, and greater valuation of kangaroos by landholders. However, there is little understanding of how landholders could be involved in kangaroo harvest and production, and there is a widespread misconception that this would include domestication, fencing, mustering and trucking. This paper reviews the options for landholder involvement in managing and harvesting wild kangaroos, and assesses the possible benefits and feasibility of such options. We conclude that collaboration among landholders, as well as between landholders and harvesters, forms the basis of any preferred option, and set out a proposed operating model based on the formation of a kangaroo management, processing and marketing co-operative.

Keywords: conservation, co-operative, sustainable use, total grazing pressure, wildlife management.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012