Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of light conditions and plant density on growth and reproductive biology of Cascabela thevetia (L.) Lippold

Faiz F. Bebawi A C , Shane D. Campbell A and Robert J. Mayer B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Tropical Weeds Research Centre, PO Box 187, Charters Towers, Qld 4820, Australia.

B Agri-Science Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Maroochy Research Station, Mayers Road, Nambour, Qld 4560, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: Faiz.Bebawi@daff.qld.gov.au

The Rangeland Journal 36(5) 459-467 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ14038
Submitted: 17 March 2014  Accepted: 7 August 2014   Published: 15 September 2014

Abstract

Cascabela thevetia (L.) Lippold (Apocynaceae) is an invasive woody weed that has formed large infestations at several locations in northern Australia. Understanding the reproductive biology of C. thevetia is vital to its management. This paper reports results of a shade house experiment that determined the effects of light conditions (100% or 30% of natural light) and plant densities (one, two, four or eight plants per plot) on the growth, time to flowering and seed formation, and monthly pod production of two C. thevetia biotypes (peach and yellow). Shaded plants were significantly larger when they reached reproductive maturity than plants grown under natural light. However, plants grown under natural light flowered earlier (268 days compared with 369 days) and produced 488 more pods per pot (a 5-fold increase) over 3 years. The yellow biotype was slightly taller at reproductive maturity but significantly taller and with significantly greater aboveground biomass at the end of the study. Both biotypes flowered at a similar time under natural light and low plant densities but the yellow biotype was quicker to seed (478 versus 498 days), produced significantly more pods (364 versus 203 pods) and more shoot growth (577 g versus 550 g) than the peach biotype over 3 years. Higher densities of C. thevetia tended to significantly reduce the shoot and root growth by 981 g and 714 g per plant across all light conditions and biotypes over 3 years and increase the time taken to flower by 140 days and produce seeds by 184 days. For land managers trying to prevent establishment of C. thevetia or to control seedling regrowth once initial infestations have been treated, this study indicates that young plants have the potential to flower and produce seeds within 268 and 353 days, respectively. However, with plant growth and reproduction most likely to be slower under field conditions, annual surveillance and control activities should be sufficient to find and treat plants before they produce seeds and replenish soil seed banks. The most at-risk part of the landscape may be open areas that receive maximum sunlight, particularly within riparian habitats where plants would consistently have more favourable soil moisture conditions.

Additional keywords: Captain Cook tree, flowering, height, seed formation, shoot and root biomass, yellow oleander.


References

Aleric, K. M., and Kirkman, L. K. (2005). Growth and photosynthetic responses of the federally endangered shrub, Lindera melissifolia (Lauraceae), to varied light environments. American Journal of Botany 92, 682–689.
Growth and photosynthetic responses of the federally endangered shrub, Lindera melissifolia (Lauraceae), to varied light environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21652446PubMed |

Alvarado-Cárdenas, L. O., and Ochoterena, H. (2007). A phylogenetic analysis of the Cascabela-Thevetia species complex (Plumerieae, Apocynaceae) based on morphology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 94, 298–323.
A phylogenetic analysis of the Cascabela-Thevetia species complex (Plumerieae, Apocynaceae) based on morphology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Anonymous (2003). ‘Declared Plants of Queensland, NRM Facts – Pest Species, PPI.’ Land protection, the State of Queensland. (Department of Natural Resources and Mines: Brisbane, Qld.)

Bebawi, F. F., and Campbell, S. D. (2004). Interactions between meat ants (Iridomyrmex spadius) and bellyache bush (Jatropha gossypiifolia). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 1157–1164.
Interactions between meat ants (Iridomyrmex spadius) and bellyache bush (Jatropha gossypiifolia).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bebawi, F. F., Campbell, S. D., and Stanley, T. D. (2002). Priority lists for weed research in the wet- and dry-tropics of north Queensland. Plant Protection Quarterly 17, 67–73.

Bebawi, F. F., Mayer, R. J., and Campbell, S. D. (2005). Flowering and capsule production of bellyache bush (Jatropha gossypiifolia L.). Plant Protection Quarterly 20, 129–132.

Bebawi, F. F., Vitelli, J. S., Campbell, S. D., Vogler, W. D., Lockett, C. J., Grace, B. S., Lukitsch, B., and Heard, T. A. (2009). Jatropha gossypiifolia L. In: ‘The Biology of Australian Weeds, Vol. 3’. (Ed. F. D. Panetta.) pp. 102–127. (R. G. and F. J. Richardson: Melbourne, Vic.)

Biosecurity Act (2014). Available at: www.legislation.qld.gov.au (accessed 19 July 2014).

Campbell, S. D., and Grice, A. C. (2000). Weed biology – a foundation for weed management. Tropical Grasslands 34, 271–279.

Campbell, L. G., and Snow, A. A. (2007). Competition alters life history and increases the relative fecundity of crop-wild radish hybrids (Raphanus spp.). New Phytologist 173, 648–660.
Competition alters life history and increases the relative fecundity of crop-wild radish hybrids (Raphanus spp.).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17244060PubMed |

Casal, J. J. (2013). Photoreceptor signalling networks in plant responses to shade. Annual Review of Plant Biology 64, 403–427.
Photoreceptor signalling networks in plant responses to shade.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXosFSktb4%3D&md5=785a53c91d4d6f179ae9eb01a62fd599CAS | 23373700PubMed |

Casal, J. J., and Smith, H. (1989). The function, action and adaptive significance of phytochrome in light-grown plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 12, 855–862.
The function, action and adaptive significance of phytochrome in light-grown plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cowie, I., and Kerrigan, R. (2007). ‘Introduced Flora of the Northern Territory.’ (Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport: Darwin, NT.)

Csurhes, S., and Edwards, R. (1998). ‘Potential Environmental Weeds in Australia.’ (National Weeds Program, Environment Australia: Canberra, ACT.)

Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (2013). ‘Fact Sheet – Captain Cook Tree.’ (The State of Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Queensland Government: Brisbane, Qld.)

Devlin, P. F., Yanovsky, M. J., and Kay, S. A. (2003). A genomic analysis of the shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 133, 1617–1629.
A genomic analysis of the shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhvFeh&md5=5f3a78408f6dba0b61892ddd622116b4CAS | 14645734PubMed |

Dudley, S. A., and Schmitt, J. (1995). Genetic differentiation in morphological responses to simulated foliage shade between populations of Impatiens-Capensis from open and woodland sites. Functional Ecology 9, 655–666.
Genetic differentiation in morphological responses to simulated foliage shade between populations of Impatiens-Capensis from open and woodland sites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Everist, S. L. (1974). ‘Poisonous Plants of Australia.’ (Angus and Robertson Publishers Pty Ltd: Sydney, NSW.)

Fallen, M. E. (1986). Floral structure in the Apocynaceae: morphological, functional and evolutionary aspects. Botanische Jahrbucher Systematik 106, 245–286.

Forster, M. A., Ladd, B., and Bonser, S. P. (2011). Optimal allocation of resources in response to shading and neighbours in the heteroblastic species, Acacia implexa. Annals of Botany 107, 219–228.
Optimal allocation of resources in response to shading and neighbours in the heteroblastic species, Acacia implexa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21135029PubMed |

Franklin, K. A. (2008). Shade avoidance. New Phytologist 179, 930–944.
Shade avoidance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFWqur%2FK&md5=38e5de0f371128c5bb70479e32b6ed28CAS | 18537892PubMed |

Franklin, K. A., and Whitelam, G. C. (2005). Phytochromes and shade avoidance responses in plants. Annals of Botany 96, 169–175.
Phytochromes and shade avoidance responses in plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXps1ymtrw%3D&md5=72d51790d185ff6faa69fccc61172729CAS | 15894550PubMed |

Gilbert, I. R., Jarvis, P. G., and Smith, H. (2001). Proximity signal and shade avoidance differences between early and late successional trees. Nature 411, 792–795.
Proximity signal and shade avoidance differences between early and late successional trees.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXksF2htbw%3D&md5=286461eab49860ef699b64853322a97eCAS | 11459056PubMed |

Grice, A. C., and Martin, T. G. (2005). ‘The Management of Weeds and Their Impact on Biodiversity in the Rangelands.’ (The CRC for Australian Weed Management and CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra, ACT.)

Harper, J. L. (1977). ‘Population Biology of Plants.’ (Academic Press: London, UK.)

Hilbert, D. W. (1990). Optimization of plant root: shoot ratios and internal nitrogen concentration. Annals of Botany 66, 91–99.
| 1:CAS:528:DyaK3MXltlyl&md5=b3705974add33d65fec17ec4ba3c2591CAS |

Hussey, B. M. J., Keighery, G. J., Dodd, J., Lloyd, S. G., and Cousens, R. D. (1997). ‘Western Weeds: a Guide to the Weeds of Western Australia.’ 2nd edn. (The Weeds Society of WA: Victoria Park, WA.)

Keuskamp, D. H., Sasidharan, R., and Pierik, R. (2010). Physiological regulation and functional significance of shade avoidance responses to neighbours. Plant Signaling & Behavior 5, 655–662.
Physiological regulation and functional significance of shade avoidance responses to neighbours.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhs1alurs%3D&md5=e332f5a60128db45f127c6e5f0768071CAS |

McKenzie, J., Brazier, D., Owen, A., Vitelli, J., and Mayer, B. (2010). Stem injection: a control technique often overlooked for exotic woody weeds. In: ‘Proceedings 17th Australasian Weeds Conference’. (Ed. S. M. Zydenbos.) pp. 459-461. (New Zealand Plant Protection Society: Christchurch.)

Miller, I. L., and Walduck, G. D. (2011). ‘Weeds in Top End Gardens.’ Agnote. (Biosecurity and Product Integrity, Northern Territory Government: Darwin, NT.)

Mooney, H. A., Bloom, A. J., and Chapin, F. S. (1985). Resource limitation in plants, an economic analogy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16, 363–392.

Morgan, D. C., and Smith, H. A. (1979). Systemic relationship between phytochrome controlled and species habitat, for plants grown in simulated natural radiation. Planta 145, 253–258.
Systemic relationship between phytochrome controlled and species habitat, for plants grown in simulated natural radiation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaE1MXitVSntLw%3D&md5=272ccc715477a5985a7040e7f3efa06aCAS | 24317731PubMed |

Navie, S. C., McFadyen, R. E., Panetta, F. D., and Adkins, S. W. (1996). A comparison of the growth and phenology of two introduced biotypes of parthenium hysterophorous. In: ‘Proceedings of the 11th Australian Weeds Conference’. (Ed. R. C. H. Shepherd.) pp. 313–316. (Weed Science Society of Victoria: Frankston, Vic..)

Ong, C. K., and Baker, R. H. (1985). Temperature and leaf growth. In: ‘Control of Leaf Growth’. (Eds N. R. Baker, W. J. Davies and C. K. Ong.) pp. 175–199. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Randall, A., Campbell, S., Vogler, W., Bebawi, F., and Madigan, B. (2009). ‘Bellyache Bush (Jatropha gossypiifolia) Management Manual – Current Control Options and Management Case Studies From Across Australia.’ (Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation: Brisbane, Qld.)

Ridley, H. N. (1990). ‘The Dispersal of Plants throughout the World.’ (L. Reeve & Co.: Kent, UK.)

Robinson, D. (1986). Compensatory changes in the partitioning of dry matter in relation to nitrogen uptake and optimal variations of growth. Annals of Botany 58, 841–848.

Schmitt, J., and Wulff, R. D. (1993). Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8, 47–51.
Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7itVygtg%3D%3D&md5=6a9b0e19563578ec0c99d399d867712bCAS |

Schmitt, J., McCormac, A. C., and Smith, H. (1995). A test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis using transgenic and mutant plants disabled in phytochrome-mediated elongation responses to neighbours. American Naturalist 146, 937–953.
A test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis using transgenic and mutant plants disabled in phytochrome-mediated elongation responses to neighbours.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Short, P. S., Albrecht, D. E., Cowie, I. D., and Stuckey, B. M. (2011). ‘Checklist of the Vascular Plants of the Northern Territory.’ Northern Territory Herbarium. (Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport: Darwin, NT.)

Smith, H. (1982). Light quality, photoperception, and plant strategy. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 33, 481–518.
| 1:CAS:528:DyaL38Xkt1Slt70%3D&md5=35ce063fb4aa0639d8f7461ced8d281aCAS |

Smith, N. M. (2011). ‘Weeds of Northern Australia: a Field Guide.’ (Environment Centre: Darwin, NT.)

Tilman, D. (1988). ‘Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)

Vitelli, J., and Madigan, B. (2011). Evaluating the efficacy of the EZ-Ject herbicide system in Queensland, Australia. The Rangeland Journal 33, 299–305.
Evaluating the efficacy of the EZ-Ject herbicide system in Queensland, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Warwick, S. I., and Thompson, B. K. (1987). Differential response to competition in weedy biotypes of proso millet. Canadian Journal of Botany 65, 1403–1409.
Differential response to competition in weedy biotypes of proso millet.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weinig, C. (2000). Differing selection in alternative competitive environments: shade-avoidance responses and germination time. Evolution 54, 124–136.
Differing selection in alternative competitive environments: shade-avoidance responses and germination time.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvjsFOmug%3D%3D&md5=77236ee827a1fdff0ecd605db3d64b01CAS | 10937189PubMed |

Werren, G. (2001). ‘Environmental weeds of the Wet Tropics Bioregion: risk assessment and priority ranking.’ Report prepared for the Wet Tropics Management Authority. (Rainforest CRC: Cairns, Qld.)

Xing-fu, Y., Jian-li, W., and Li-biao, Z. (2011). Effects of light intensity on Quercus liaotungensis seed germination and seedling growth. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 22, 1682–1688.