Register      Login
The Rangeland Journal The Rangeland Journal Society
Journal of the Australian Rangeland Society
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Radicalising the rangelands: disruptive change or progressive policy?

Bruce W. Walker
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Appropriate Technology Ltd, PO Box 8044, Desert Peoples Centre at the Desert Knowledge Precinct, South Stuart Highway, Alice Springs, NT, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: bruce.walker@icat.org.au

The Rangeland Journal 37(6) 631-635 https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ15050
Submitted: 31 May 2015  Accepted: 22 September 2015   Published: 10 November 2015

Abstract

Only ~15% of Australians now live outside the cities and the essentially suburban coastal corridor. Those coastal suburbs are home not to the descendants of drovers and Anzacs, but to ambitious migrants from Asia and the Middle–East, with no taste for rural life. Under pressure of globalisation and market economics the narrative of the rangelands has changed and with that the national interest in the rangelands has declined. Increasingly self-interest has over-powered national interest in the rangelands. The traditional narrative relied on mining, pastoralism and tourism and the contest for land and resources between these sectors and Aboriginal interests. The early champions in each of these sectors were revered. Today these sectors are driven more by self-interest and international investors than national interest. Today, there is not the same recognition of the names like Kidman or Flynn or Perkins as in the past. The rangelands are no longer in the hearts and minds of the nation. Rangelands impinge to a degree on national security through the buffer of confidence their vast expanse provides to coastal communities. Rangelands also figure in the national conscience through the complexity of issues around ‘the problem’ of Aboriginal lifestyles as perceived by coastal communities. Yet topics that spark national interest in rangelands are hard to identify unless they relate to share dividends. In this indifferent environment, will the rangelands benefit from grand national-policy initiatives or from increasingly focussed progressive policy? This paper argues for a narrative with a more disruptive and innovative radicalisation of the rangelands to re-ignite national interest and national investment.

Additional keywords: governance, national interest, policy failure, rangeland futures, remote FOCUS.


References

Austin-Broos, D. (2011). ‘A Different Inequality: The Politics of Debate about Remote Aboriginal Australia.’ (Allen and Unwin: Sydney, NSW.)

Barnes, P. (2006). ‘Capitalism 3.0: A Guide to Reclaiming the Commons.’ p. 46. (Berrett-Koehler Publishers: San Francisco, CA.)

Blesing, D., Andrew, M., Foran, B. D., Abel, N., and Bourne, J. (1996). Looking out or looking in two ways ahead for Australia’s rangelands. In: ‘Sustainable habitation in the rangelands. Proceedings of Fenner Conference on the Environment’. Canberra, ACT, 29–30 October 1996. (Eds N. Abel and S. Ryan.) (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic.)

Chaney, F., and Jocelyn Davies, S. (2015). Innovation in the rangelands: the role of people. The Rangeland Journal 37, .

Cross, J. (2011). ‘Great Central State: The Foundation of the Northern Territory.’ p. 19. (Wakefield Press: Adelaide, SA.)

Davies, J., and Holcombe, S. (2009). Desert knowledge: integrating knowledge and development in arid and semi-arid drylands. GeoJournal 74, 363–375.
Desert knowledge: integrating knowledge and development in arid and semi-arid drylands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Fitzhardinge, G. (2012). Australia’s rangelands: a future vision. The Rangeland Journal 34, 33–45.
Australia’s rangelands: a future vision.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Foran, B. D. (2007). Sifting the future from the past: personal assessment of trends impacting the Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal 29, 3–11.
Sifting the future from the past: personal assessment of trends impacting the Australian rangelands.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Joint Select Committee on Northern Australia (2014). ‘Pivot North: inquiry into the development of Northern Australia: Final Report.’ (The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra, ACT.)

Marsh, I. (2012). Are there structural barriers to hole of Government? In: ‘The Challenge, Conversation, Commissioned Papers and Regional Studies of Remote Australia’. Desert Knowledge Australia, Alice Springs, NT. (Ed. B. Walker.) pp. 73–128. Available at: www.desertknowledge.com.au/getattachment/Our-Programs/remoteFOCUS/Get-informed/remoteFOCUS_Compendium_August_2012.pdf.aspx (accessed 1 September 2015)

Sabel, C. (2004). Beyond principal-agent governance: experimentalist organisations, learning and accountability. In: ‘De staat van de democratie. Democratic voorbij de staat’. (Eds E. R. Engelen and M. Sie Dhian Ho.) pp. 173–195. (Amsterdam University Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.)

Sabel, C., and Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal 14, 271–327.
Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sider, G. M. (2014). Making and breaking the Aboriginal remote: realities, languages, tomorrows. A Commentary. Oceania 84, 158–168.
Making and breaking the Aboriginal remote: realities, languages, tomorrows. A Commentary.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stafford Smith, M., James, C., McGregor, M., and Ferguson, J. (2008). Guest editorial: building a science of desert living. The Rangeland Journal 30, 1–2.
Guest editorial: building a science of desert living.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Taylor, J. (2001). Population futures in the Australian desert, 2001–2016. Discussion Paper No. 201, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, ANU, Canberra. http://caepr.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/Publications/DP/2002_DP231.pdf (accessed 5 May 2015).

Traill, B. (2014). A Modern Outback – nature, people and the future of remote Australia. The Australian, October 11 2014. Available at: www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/a-modern-outback-nature-people-and-the-future-of-remote-australia/story-e6frg6zo-1227086873825?nk=913aba8faf787190fe1bac3a44c68400 (accessed 13 February 2015).

Traill, B., and Woinarski, J. (2014). The Modern Outback – nature, people and the future of remote Australia. The PEW Charitable Trusts, 1 October 2014. Available at: www.pewtrusts.org.au/outback (accessed 13 February 2015).

Walker, B. W., Stafford Smith, M., and Porter, D. J. (2009). Investing in the Outback: a framework of Indigenous development within Australia. Dialogue 28, 19–31.

Walker, B. W., Porter, D. J., and Marsh, I. (2012). ‘Fixing the Hole in Australia’s Heartland: How Government Needs to Work in Remote Australia.’ (Desert Knowledge Australia: Alice Springs, NT.)

Watson, D. (2014). ‘The Bush: Travels in the Heart of Australia.’ (Hamish Hamilton: Melbourne, Vic.)