CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Exploration Geophysics   
Exploration Geophysics
http://www.aseg.org.au
  The Bulletin of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Committee
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Sample Issue
Call for Papers
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

red arrow Submit Article
blank image
Use the online submission system to send us your paper.

red arrow Call for Papers
blank image
We are preparing a themed issue. More...

red arrow Preview
blank image
Preview, the Magazine of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, is also available online.

red arrow ASEG Extended Abstracts
blank image
ASEG Extended Abstracts, drawn from the ASEG´s conferencces, is also available online.

 

Article << Previous     |         Contents Vol 31(2)

Pore pressure/stress coupling and its implications for seismicity

R. Hillis

Exploration Geophysics 31(2) 448 - 454
Published: 2000

Abstract

Periodic pressure measurements made during the depletion of oil fields and virgin pressure measurements through normally- and over-pressured sequences in sedimentary basins both demonstrate that changes in pore pressure and minimum horizontal stress (sh) are coupled to one another. Pore pressure/stress coupling is predicted by poroelastic theory. Data from the North Sea (Ekofisk Field) and Texas (Travis Peak Formation of east Texas and Vicksburg Formation of south Texas) suggest that sh decreases at approximately 80% and 50% of the rate of depletion of reservoir pore pressure respectively. Virgin pressures in overpressured sedimentary basins suggest that sh increases at approximately 60?80% of the rate of increase in pore pressure in the Canadian Scotian Shelf, the Australian North West Shelf and the Gannet/Guillemot Fields area of the North Sea. The total vertical stress sv is given by the weight of the overburden and is unaffected by changes in pore pressure. Hence, contra to simple, uncoupled models of the effect of pore pressure on rock failure, differential stress in normal fault regime basins (sv-sh) increases as pore pressure decreases, and decreases as pore pressure increases. Increased differential stress with decreased pore pressure can account for depletion-induced seismicity, despite effective stresses increasing. Decreased differential stress with increased pore pressure implies that a greater increase in pore pressure can be withstood prior to failure than would otherwise be predicted, and increases the propensity of tensile, rather than shear failure, occurring with overpressure development.



Full text doi:10.1071/EG00448

© ASEG 2000

blank image >
 
PDF (418 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013