CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Exploration Geophysics   
Exploration Geophysics
  The Bulletin of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Committee
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Sample Issue
Call for Papers
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 New Submission & Review System
This journal is now using ScholarOne Manuscripts as its submission and peer review system. See our Instructions to Authors for more information about this transition.

 Call for Papers
We are preparing a themed issue. More...

 Preview
Preview, the Magazine of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, is also available online.

 ASEG Extended Abstracts
ASEG Extended Abstracts, drawn from the ASEG“s conferencces, is also available online.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 32(2)

Draping corrections for aeromagnetic data: line-versus grid-based approaches

M. Pilkington and J.B. Thurston

Exploration Geophysics 32(2) 95 - 101

Abstract

In drape-flown aeromagnetic surveys, operational factors such as weather and rugged ground topography may result in certain lines flown at average heights significantly different from the nominal terrain clearance. Such changes in the distance from sensor to magnetic source lead to variable attenuation of the magnetic field and result in spurious anomalies oriented along flight lines. A recent survey flown in Namibia was subjected to high wind conditions that led to some anomalously high flight lines and severe corrugation effects in the gridded data parallel to the line direction. Computational draping of the measured field to correct for the line-height variation was carried out on both gridded and line data using a Taylor series approach. The line-based approach produced the best results. Gradients calculated from the gridded data (perpendicular to the traverse lines) were overwhelmed by errors caused by the large line-to-line height variation.



Full text doi:10.1071/EG01095

© ASEG 2001

 
PDF (833 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012