CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Exploration Geophysics   
Exploration Geophysics
  The Bulletin of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Committee
Contacts
For Advertisers
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Sample Issue
Call for Papers
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Submit Article
Use the online submission system to send us your paper.

 Call for Papers
We are preparing a themed issue. More...

 Preview
Preview, the Magazine of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, is also available online.

 ASEG Extended Abstracts
ASEG Extended Abstracts, drawn from the ASEG“s conferencces, is also available online.

 

Article << Previous     |         Contents Vol 23(4)

The geophysical responses of buried drums ? field tests in weathered Hawkesbury Sandstone, Sydney Basin, NSW

D.W. Emerson, J.E. Reid, D.A. Clark, M.S.C. Hallett and P.B. Manning

Exploration Geophysics 23(4) 589 - 617

Abstract

Field and laboratory experiments and tests were carried out to investigate the response of buried steel and plastic drums to the magnetic, transient electromagnetic and resistivity profiling techniques in a magnetically quiet weathered Hawkesbury Sandstone environment in the central Sydney Basin. Steel drums, 200 l, 50 l, 20 l, and 5 l in size, and plastic containers, 70 l, and 20 l in size, were used as buried targets in controlled profiling surveys. The proton precession magnetic method located individual drums buried at shallow depths but with increasing difficulty as drum size decreased. The survey profiles provided data that could be modelled by sphere or dipole sources magnetized by induction as viscous and permanent maqnetization contributions were minor. Clusters of buried drums were readily detected by magnetometry and the data successfully modelled with an array of dipole sources. The TEM method clearly located individual steel drums, but the drum anomaly was less evident in the Wenner resistivity data. Plastic drums were not detected by any of the methods applied. Magnetic surveying is the primary method of choice for the location of shallowly buried steel drums in environmental studies.



Full text doi:10.1071/EG992589

© ASEG 1992

 
PDF (3.1 MB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012