Register      Login
Healthcare Infection Healthcare Infection Society
Official Journal of the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay to confirm surface disinfection of biological indicators with vaporised hydrogen peroxide (VHP)

Erica M. Colbert A , Shawn G. Gibbs A F , Kendra K. Schmid B , Robin High B , John J. Lowe A C , Oleg Chaika A and Philip W. Smith C D E
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Environmental, Agricultural and Occupational Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, NE, USA.

B Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, NE, USA.

C Center for Preparedness Education, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, NE, USA.

D Department of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, NE, USA.

E Section of Infectious Disease, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.

F Corresponding author. Email: sgibbs@unmc.edu

Healthcare Infection 20(1) 16-22 https://doi.org/10.1071/HI14022
Submitted: 20 July 2014  Accepted: 27 October 2014   Published: 26 November 2014

Abstract

Background: Decontamination of hospital isolation rooms can be conducted using vaporised hydrogen peroxide (VHP). A more rapid biological indicator, such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence, could allow rooms to be reoccupied sooner and reduce down time.

Aim: This study examined the ATP bioluminescence assay as a way to evaluate biological indicators to confirm decontamination following the use of VHP.

Methods: Response to VHP exposure was evaluated using microbial inactivation by standard culture methods and by the ATP bioluminescence assay. Range finding determined the approximate exposure time necessary to achieve partial and complete inactivation of the organisms. Two-hundred-and-fifty parts per million of VHP was delivered to the chamber during the exposure cycle. Fifty cm2 stainless steel coupons were inoculated with 50 µL of organism suspensions containing >109 colony forming units (CFU) of the following: Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The standard manufactured biological indicator stainless steel discs containing concentrations of 104, 105 and 106 CFU/surface of Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores were also evaluated.

Findings: Multiple log-reductions were shown utilising standard culture methods for each organism, but the ATP bioluminescence assay did not show a corresponding log-reduction.

Conclusion: The ATP bioluminescence assay was not considered an effective alternate to standard culture-based methodologies for the confirmation of VHP decontamination.

Additional keywords: decontamination, hospital-acquired infection.


References

[1]  Klevens RM, Edwards R, Richards CL, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Pollock DA, Cardo DM. Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep 2007; 12 160–6.

[2]  Mulvey D, Redding P, Roberston C, Woodall C, Kingsmore P, Bedwell D, Dancer SJ. Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness. J Hosp Infect 2011; 77 25–30.
Finding a benchmark for monitoring hospital cleanliness.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M%2FmvVGgsg%3D%3D&md5=2c4766cd4244df3b0b19b2f23acab7d0CAS | 21129820PubMed |

[3]  Pottage T, Macken S, Walker JT, Bennett AM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is more resistant to vaporized hydrogen peroxide than commercial Geobacillus stearothermophilus biological indicators. J Hosp Infect 2012; 80 41–5.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is more resistant to vaporized hydrogen peroxide than commercial Geobacillus stearothermophilus biological indicators.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC38%2FpvVOqsg%3D%3D&md5=9103230270d6e54ca72726e833b1174bCAS | 22137066PubMed |

[4]  Jernigan DB, Raghunathan PL, Bell BP, Brechner R, Bresnitz EA, Butler JC, Cetron M, Cohen M, Doyle T, Fischer M, Greene C, Griffith KS, Guarner J, Hadler JL, Hayslett JA, Meyer R, Petersen LR, Phillips M, Pinner R, Popovic T, Quinn CP, Reefhuis J, Reissman D, Rosenstein N, Schuchat A, Shieh WJ, Siegal L, Swerdlow DL, Tenover FC, Traeger M, Ward JW, Weisfuse I, Wiersma S, Yeskey K, Zaki S, Ashford DA, Perkins BA, Ostroff S, Hughes J, Fleming D, Koplan JP, Gerberding JL, National Anthrax Epidemiologic Investigation Team Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, United States, 2001: epidemiologic findings. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8 1019–28.
Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, United States, 2001: epidemiologic findings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12396909PubMed |

[5]  Pottage T, Macken S, Giri K, Walker JT, Bennett AM. Low-temperature decontamination with hydrogen peroxide or chlorine dioxide for space applications. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78 4169–74.
Low-temperature decontamination with hydrogen peroxide or chlorine dioxide for space applications.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XpvFKhu70%3D&md5=fd046dc420c7e769e6fc25935ef1e846CAS | 22492450PubMed |

[6]  French GL, Otter JA, Shannon KP, Adams NMT, Watling D, Parks MJ. Tackling contamination of the hospital environment by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a comparison between conventional terminal cleaning and hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination. J Hosp Infect 2004; 57 31–7.
Tackling contamination of the hospital environment by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a comparison between conventional terminal cleaning and hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3ksVGmsA%3D%3D&md5=109e279759c4cf91a818b7891b9f2fc6CAS | 15142713PubMed |

[7]  Poulis JA, De Pipijper M, Mossel DA, Dekkers PP. Assessment of cleaning and disinfection in the food industry with the rapid ATP-bioluminescenc technique combined with the tissue-fluid contamination test and a conventional microbiological method. Int J Food Microbiol 1993; 20 109–16.
Assessment of cleaning and disinfection in the food industry with the rapid ATP-bioluminescenc technique combined with the tissue-fluid contamination test and a conventional microbiological method.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK2cXisVakt78%3D&md5=42381d3bc8c1c73d2393586e270a96b2CAS | 8268054PubMed |

[8]  Shama G, Malik DJ. The uses and abuses of rapid bioluminescence-based ATP assays. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2013; 216 115–25.
The uses and abuses of rapid bioluminescence-based ATP assays.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XmtFGnsb0%3D&md5=3d90bee4cf9ece6136b71058f20900feCAS | 22541898PubMed |

[9]  Smith PW, Gibbs SG, Sayles H, Hewlett A, Rupp ME, Iwen PC. Observations on hospital room contamination testing. Healthc Infect 2013; 18 10–3.
Observations on hospital room contamination testing.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Smith PW, Sayles H, Hewlett A, Cavalieri RJ, Gibbs SG, Rupp ME. A study of three methods for assessment of hospital environmental cleaning. Healthc Infect 2013; 18 80–5.
A study of three methods for assessment of hospital environmental cleaning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Setlow B, Cowan AE, Setlow P. Germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis with dodecylamine. J Appl Microbiol 2003; 95 637–48.
Germination of spores of Bacillus subtilis with dodecylamine.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXns1Shtbs%3D&md5=56ae0674d94babfe278c23de54c570ebCAS | 12911713PubMed |

[12]  Gibbs SG, Sayles H, Colbert EM, Hewlett A, Chaika O, Smith PW. Evaluation of the relationship between the Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay and the presence of Bacillus anthracis spores and vegetative cells. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014; 11 5708–19.
Evaluation of the relationship between the Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay and the presence of Bacillus anthracis spores and vegetative cells.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhs1Cqsr3L&md5=d41ce469e6ea355ca952e6cf10d3f5e5CAS | 24879485PubMed |

[13]  Gibbs SG, Sayles H, Chaika O, Hewlett A, Colbert EM, Smith PW. Evaluation of the relationship between ATP bioluminescence assay and the presence of Bacillus anthracis spores and vegetative cells. Healthc Infect 2014;
Evaluation of the relationship between ATP bioluminescence assay and the presence of Bacillus anthracis spores and vegetative cells.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Westfall P, Tobias RD, Wolfinger RD. Multiple comparisons and multiple tests using SAS@R. 2nd edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2011.

[15]  Barbut F, Menuet D, Verachten M, Girou E. Comparison of the efficacy of a hydrogen peroxide dry-mist disinfection system and sodium hypochlorite solution for eradication of Clostridium difficile spores. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009; 30 507–14.
Comparison of the efficacy of a hydrogen peroxide dry-mist disinfection system and sodium hypochlorite solution for eradication of Clostridium difficile spores.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzjvFajtw%3D%3D&md5=6aa0e9ba351250ba9dc361c2b791f97aCAS | 19379098PubMed |

[16]  Rogers JV, Sabourin CLK, Choi YW, Richter WR, Rudnicki DC, Riggs KB, Taylor ML, Chang J. Decontamination assessment of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus subtilis, and Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores on indoor surfaces using a hydrogen peroxide gas generator. J Appl Microbiol 2005; 99 739–48.
Decontamination assessment of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus subtilis, and Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores on indoor surfaces using a hydrogen peroxide gas generator.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXhtFyhsr3E&md5=98ffcda9822aa3b7741b7f4b78d032fbCAS | 16162224PubMed |

[17]  Linley E, Denyer SP, McDonnell G, Simons C, Maillard J-Y. Use of hydrogen peroxide as a biocide: new consideration of its mechanisms of biocidal action. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67 1589–96.
Use of hydrogen peroxide as a biocide: new consideration of its mechanisms of biocidal action.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38Xotlertbc%3D&md5=467e516c2453d525a591b286e687691aCAS | 22532463PubMed |

[18]  United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Pesticide Programs Microbiology Laboratory, Environmental Science Center. Ft. Meade, MD. Standard operating procedure for AOAC use dilution method for testing disinfectants. SOP number: MB-05–08 . Date revised: 4 February 2010.