CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Australian Journal of Primary Health   
Australian Journal of Primary Health
  The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Papers In Press
Special Issues
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 9(3)

Participation and chronic disease self-management: Are we risking inequitable resource allocation?

Michele Foster, Elizabeth Kendall, Paul Dickson, Wendy Chaboyer, Beth Hunter and Travis Gee

Australian Journal of Primary Health 9(3) 132 - 140

Abstract

The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion supported the empowerment of individuals to participate in their health care and have control over their health. For older adults with chronic conditions, the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program has been widely adopted as an adjunct to existing healthcare options. A growing body of literature has supported the positive impact of self-management programs on outcomes for people with a range of chronic conditions. However, evidence also suggests that participation in these programs is biased. This paper draws on pilot data to describe the profile of those people who inquire, enrol, attend, and complete CDSM courses in Queensland, Australia. As expected, there was evidence that males, Indigenous people, people of non-English speaking background, and those with multiple responsibilities were less likely to participate. Most importantly, participation was affected by a self-selection bias associated with health status. Those who were either unwell or well at the time of the course were unlikely to attend, minimising the preventative value of the CDSM program. Further, CDSM evaluation studies are likely to be inherently flawed and the distribution of health resources can become inequitable.



Full text doi:10.1071/PY03037

© La Trobe University 2003

 
PDF (172 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012