Sustaining cardiovascular absolute risk management in Australian general practice

Article

<< Previous

Next >>

Contents Vol 18(4)

doi:10.1071/PY11091

The issues influencing community health services and primary health care

	Search




	Advanced Search



	Journal Home

	About the Journal

	Editorial Board

	Contacts



	Content

	Online Early

	Current Issue

	Just Accepted

	All Issues

	Special Issues

	Sample Issue



	For Authors

	General Information

	Instructions to Authors

	Submit Article



	For Referees

	Referee Guidelines

	Review Article

	Annual Referee Index



	For Subscribers

	Subscription Prices

	Customer Service

	Print Publication Dates

e-Alerts

Subscribe to our email Early Alert or

feeds for the latest journal papers.

Connect with us

Sustaining cardiovascular absolute risk management in Australian general practice

Ruhie Vaidya ^A, Keval V. Pandya ^A, Elizabeth Denney-Wilson ^A ^B and Mark Harris ^A

^A Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Level 3, AGSM Building, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
^B Corresponding author. Email: e.denney-wilson@unsw.edu.au

Australian Journal of Primary Health 18(4) 304-307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/PY11091
Submitted: 12 August 2011 Accepted: 7 November 2011 Published: 7 December 2011





	PDF (101 KB) $25



	Export Citation

Print

Abstract

This study describes the attitudes and practices of patients and GPs 12 months after participating in a trial of absolute cardiovascular risk assessment in general practice. It involved a qualitative design using semistructured interviews with 12 Sydney GPs from the intervention arm of a cluster randomised controlled trial of cardiovascular absolute risk (CVAR) assessment and 15 of their moderate to high risk patients who participated in the assessments. Most GPs had sustained CVAR assessment in their practice, using it primarily to motivate patients to change their behaviour and adhere to management rather than to make decisions about pharmacotherapy or referral. Time was a barrier to its use. Patients who sustained changes to their behaviour had internalised the benefits to their health and received support from family and friends. Those who relapsed attributed this to their own lack of motivation and extrinsic factors. CVAR assessment needs to be incorporated into practice information systems and long-term planned preventive care if it is to be sustained in general practice and have long-term impacts on patient behaviour.

References

Anggard EE, Land JM, Lenihan CJ, Packard CJ, Percy MJ, Ritchie LD, Shepherd J (1986) Prevention of cardiovascular disease in general practice: a proposed model. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) 293, 177–180.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Gupta R, Stocks NP, Broadbent J (2009) Cardiovascular risk assessment in Australian general practice. Australian Family Physician 38, 364–368.

Harris MF, Bennett J, Del Mar C, Fasher M, Foreman L, Furler J, Johnson C, Joyner B, Litt J, Mazza D, Smith J, Tomlins R, Bailey L, London J, Snowdon T, in conjunction with The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Publications Unit (2009) ‘Royal Australian College of General Practitioners guidelines for preventive activities in general practice.’ 7th edn. (Royal Australian College of General Practitioners: Melbourne)

Heeley EL, Peiris DP, Patel AA, Cass A, Weekes A, Morgan C, Anderson CS, Chalmers JP (2010) Cardiovascular risk perception and evidence-practice gaps in Australian general practice (the AusHEART study). The Medical Journal of Australia 192, 254–259.

Jackson R (2000) Guidelines on preventing cardiovascular disease in clinical practice. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 320, 659–661.
| CrossRef | CAS |

Koelewijn-van Loon MS, van der Weijden T, Ronda G, van Steenkiste B, Winkens B, Elwyn G, Grol R (2010) Improving lifestyle and risk perception through patient involvement in nurse-led cardiovascular risk management: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in primary care. Preventive Medicine 50, 35–44.
| CrossRef | PubMed |

Krones T, Keller H, Sönnichsen A, Sadowski EM, Baum E, Wegscheider K, Rochon J, Donner-Banzhoff N (2008) Absolute cardiovascular disease risk and shared decision making in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Annals of Family Medicine 6, 218–227.
| CrossRef | PubMed |

National Vascular Disease Prevention Alliance (2009) ‘Guidelines for the assessment of absolute cardiovascular disease risk.’ (National Heart Foundation of Australia)

Peiris DP, Joshi R, Webster RJ, Groenestein P, Usherwood TP, Heeley E, Turnbull FM, Lipman A, Patel AA (2009) An electronic clinical decision support tool to assist primary care providers in cardiovascular disease risk management: development and mixed methods evaluation. Journal of Medical Internet Research 11, e51
| CrossRef | PubMed |

Rose G (1991) Environmental health: problems and prospects. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 25, 48–52.

Torley D, Zwar N, Comino EJ, Harris M (2005) GPs’ views of absolute cardiovascular risk and its role in primary prevention. Australian Family Physician 34, 503–504.

van Steenkiste B, van der Weijden T, Stoffers HE, Grol R (2004) Barriers to implementing cardiovascular risk tables in routine general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 22, 32–37.
| CrossRef | PubMed |

Wan Q, Harris MF, Zwar N, Vagholkar S (2008) Sharing risk management: an implementation model for cardiovascular absolute risk assessment and management in Australian general practice. International Journal of Clinical Practice 62, 905–911.
| CrossRef | CAS | PubMed |

Wan Q, Harris MF, Zwar N, Campbell T, Patel A, Vagholkar S, McKenzie S, Walker C, Denney-Wilson E (2009) Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: The feasibility and impact of cardiovascular absolute risk assessment in Australian general practice. American Heart Journal 157, 436–441.
| CrossRef | PubMed |

Subscriber Login

	Username: Password:

Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help