Register      Login
Health Promotion Journal of Australia Health Promotion Journal of Australia Society
Journal of the Australian Health Promotion Association
RESEARCH FRONT

Health promotion: an ethical analysis

Stacy M. Carter
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, School of Public Health, Level 1 Building 1 K25, Medical Foundation Building, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. Email: stacy.carter@sydney.edu.au

Health Promotion Journal of Australia 25(1) 19-24 https://doi.org/10.1071/HE13074
Submitted: 3 September 2013  Accepted: 6 January 2014   Published: 16 April 2014

Abstract

Thinking and practising ethically requires reasoning systematically about the right thing to do. Health promotion ethics – a form of applied ethics – includes analysis of health promotion practice and how this can be ethically justified. Existing frameworks can assist in such evaluation. These acknowledge the moral value of delivering benefits. But benefits need to be weighed against burdens, harms or wrongs, and these should be minimised: they include invading privacy, breaking confidentiality, restraining liberty, undermining self-determination or people’s own values, or perpetuating injustice. Thinking about the ethics of health promotion also means recognising health promotion as a normative ideal: a vision of the good society. This ideal society values health, sees citizens as active and includes them in decisions that affect them, and makes the state responsible for providing all of its citizens, no matter how advantaged or disadvantaged, with the conditions and resources they need to be healthy. Ethicists writing about health promotion have focused on this relationship between the citizen and the state. Comparing existing frameworks, theories and the expressed values of practitioners themselves, we can see common patterns. All oppose pursuing an instrumental, individualistic, health-at-all-costs vision of health promotion. And all defend the moral significance of just processes: those that engage with citizens in a transparent, inclusive and open way. In recent years, some Australian governments have sought to delegitimise health promotion, defining it as extraneous to the role of the state. Good evidence is not enough to counter this trend, because it is founded in competing visions of a good society. For this reason, the most pressing agenda for health promotion ethics is to engage with communities, in a procedurally just way, about the role and responsibilities of the citizen and the state in promoting and maintaining good health.


References

[1]  Kerridge I, Lowe M, Stewart C. Ethics and law for the health professions. 4th edn. Annandale, NSW: The Federation Press; 2013.

[2]  Bauman A, O’Hara L, Signal L, Smith B, Ritchie J, Parker E, et al (2007) A perspective on changes in values in the profession of health promotion. Health Promot J Austr 18, 3–6.

[3]  Ritchie J (2006) Values in health promotion. Health Promot J Austr 17, 83

[4]  Faden RR, Faden AI (1978) Ethics of health education as public health policy. Health Educ Monogr 6, 180–97.
Ethics of health education as public health policy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaE1M%2FovVeitw%3D%3D&md5=9bb4365d16776af1b2839997213107ebCAS | 730534PubMed |

[5]  Carter S, Cribb A, Allegrante J (2012) How to think about health promotion ethics. Public Health Rev 34, 122–45.

[6]  Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press; 2008.

[7]  National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee. National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra: Australian Government; 2009.

[8]  World Health Organization. International conference on primary health care. Declaration of Alma-Ata. Alma-Ata, USSR: World Health Organization; 1978.

[9]  World Health Organization. Global strategy for health for all by the year 2000. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1981.

[10]  World Health Organization. First international conference on health promotion. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, WHO/HPR/HEP/95.1. Ottawa: World Health Organization; 1986.

[11]  Childress JF, Faden RR, Gaare RD, Gostin LO, Kahn J, Bonnie RJ, et al (2002) Public health ethics: mapping the terrain. J Law Med Ethics 30, 170–8.
Public health ethics: mapping the terrain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12066595PubMed |

[12]  Kass NE (2001) An ethics framework for public health. Am J Public Health 91, 1776–82.
An ethics framework for public health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MngvFOksg%3D%3D&md5=b5c1977a10c175c25089204c61e06e56CAS | 11684600PubMed |

[13]  Upshur REG (2002) Principles for the justification of public health intervention. Can J Public Health 93, 101–3.

[14]  Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Public health: ethical issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics; 2007.

[15]  Mill JS. On liberty. Adelaide, SA: The University of Adelaide; 2012. Available from: http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/m/mill/john_stuart/m645o [Verified 3 March 2014]

[16]  Cribb A. Health and the good society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

[17]  Cribb A, Duncan P. Health promotion and professional ethics. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing; 2002.

[18]  Seedhouse D. Health: the foundations for achievement. 2nd edn. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2001.

[19]  Seedhouse D. Health promotion: philosophy, prejudice and practice. 2nd edn. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons; 2004.

[20]  Buchanan DR. An ethic for health promotion: rethinking the sources of human well-being. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.

[21]  Porter C (2007) Ottawa to Bangkok: changing health promotion discourse. Health Promot Int 22, 72–9.
Ottawa to Bangkok: changing health promotion discourse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17015407PubMed |

[22]  Goldberg DS (2012) Social justice, health inequalities and methodological individualism in US health promotion. Public Health Ethics 5, 104–15.
Social justice, health inequalities and methodological individualism in US health promotion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Carter SM, Klinner C, Kerridge I, Rychetnik L, Li V, Fry D (2012) The ethical commitments of health promotion practitioners: an empirical study from New South Wales, Australia. Public Health Ethics 5, 128–39.
The ethical commitments of health promotion practitioners: an empirical study from New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[24]  Daniels N, Sabin JE (2008) Accountability for reasonableness: an update. BMJ 337, a1850
Accountability for reasonableness: an update.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18845595PubMed |

[25]  Sweet M, Leonard D. Mourning the demise of public health nutrition in Queensland. Croakey. 2012. Available from: http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2012/09/16/mourning-the-demise-of-public-health-nutrition-in-queensland/ [Verified 3 March 2014]

[26]  McKie J, Richardson J (2003) The rule of rescue. Soc Sci Med 56, 2407–19.
The rule of rescue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12742604PubMed |