Register      Login
Health Promotion Journal of Australia Health Promotion Journal of Australia Society
Journal of the Australian Health Promotion Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Self-reported participation and beliefs about bowel cancer screening in New South Wales, Australia

Megan Varlow A , Ingrid Stacey A , Sally Dunlop A B C , Jane Young A B , James Kite A , Anita Dessaix A and Claire McAulay B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Cancer Institute NSW, PO Box 41, Alexandria, NSW 1435, Australia.

B Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building (A27), NSW 2006, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: sally.dunlop@sydney.edu.au

Health Promotion Journal of Australia 25(2) 97-103 https://doi.org/10.1071/HE13102
Submitted: 14 November 2013  Accepted: 11 April 2014   Published: 14 July 2014

Abstract

Issue addressed: To describe self-reported bowel cancer screening participation, beliefs and attitudes in a sample of New South Wales (NSW) adults, and to identify beliefs and demographic factors associated with self-reported bowel cancer screening participation.

Methods: This study used data from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership Module 2, a representative population-based telephone survey. Self-reported participation in and beliefs about bowel cancer screening were measured using the Awareness and Beliefs about Cancer survey of people aged 50 years and over living in NSW, Australia (n = 2001). Logistic regression modelling was used to identify explanatory variables associated with bowel cancer screening participation.

Results: Half of all women (54.1%, 95% CI: 50.8–57.4%) and two-thirds of men (65.7%, 95% CI: 61.5–69.9%) reported screening for bowel cancer within the previous 5 years. Believing that screening was only necessary when experiencing symptoms was more likely to be endorsed by people aged 65 years and over (25.5%, 95% CI: 22.2–28.7%) rather than younger (50–64 years; 16.7%, 95% CI: 13.8–19.7%), non-English-speaking migrants (35.4%, 95% CI: 26.7–44.1%) versus others (18.6%, 95% CI: 16.4–20.7%), and people in metropolitan (23.3%, 95% CI: 20.4–26.1%) versus non-metropolitan areas (16.4%, 95% CI: 12.8–20%). People who disagreed that screening was only necessary when experiencing symptoms were four times more likely to report screening participation (OR 3.96, 95% CI: 3.11–5.03).

Conclusions: Community education about bowel cancer screening is needed to correct misperceptions regarding screening in the absence of symptoms. Tailored strategies for older, migrant and urban communities may be beneficial.

So what?: Education strategies that promote the need for screening in the absence of symptoms and correct misconceptions about bowel cancer screening amongst subgroups of the NSW population may improve screening rates and decrease the burden of bowel cancer in NSW.

Key words: bowel cancer screening, colorectal cancer, health beliefs, International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.


References

[1]  Tracey E, Kerr T, Dobrovic A, Currow D. Cancer in NSW: incidence and mortality report 2008. Sydney: Cancer Institute NSW; 2010.

[2]  Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender R, Levin B, Byers T, Rothenberger D, et al (2001) American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001 – testing for early lung cancer detection. CA Cancer J Clin 51, 38–75.
American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001 – testing for early lung cancer detection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrjtFGisw%3D%3D&md5=cc7b5024b46bbd7abd5d38a8cc7c471bCAS | 11577479PubMed |

[3]  Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, Ederer F (1993) Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 328, 1365–71.
Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3jtlOhtQ%3D%3D&md5=b0e68f635cbdb24b61e8f5ba90c553f4CAS | 8474513PubMed |

[4]  Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, James PD, Mangham CM (1996) Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 348, 1472–7.
Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FpvVagtg%3D%3D&md5=de8cf465ac710e768a5b3f39bd614c5aCAS | 8942775PubMed |

[5]  Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O (1996) Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 348, 1467–71.
Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FpvVagsQ%3D%3D&md5=804f959ab21359051f04e9a5826f0553CAS | 8942774PubMed |

[6]  Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Irwig L, Towler B, Watson E (2007) Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001216

[7]  AIHW. National Bowel Cancer Screening Program monitoring report: phase 2, July 2008–June 2011. Cancer series no. 65. Cat. no. CAN 61. Canberra: AIHW; 2012. Available from http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=10737421408 [Verified 12 June 2014]

[8]  Australian Health Technology Advisory Committee, AGPS. Colorectal cancer screening: a report of the Australian Health Technology Advisory Committee (pp. 1–147). Canberra: Publications Production Unit, Australian Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services; 1997.

[9]  Ananda SS, McLaughlin SJ, Chen F, Hayes IP, Hunter AA, Skinner IJ, et al (2009) Initial impact of Australia’s National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. Med J Aust 191, 378–81.

[10]  Subramanian S, Klosterman M, Amonkar MM, Hunt TL (2004) Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review. Prev Med 38, 536–50.
Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15066356PubMed |

[11]  Courtney RJ, Paul CL, Sanson-Fisher RW, Macrae FA, Carey ML, Attia JR, McEvoy MA (2012) Colorectal cancer screening in Australia: a community-level perspective. Med J Aust 196, 516–20.
Colorectal cancer screening in Australia: a community-level perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22571309PubMed |

[12]  Ait Ouakrim D, Boussioutas A, Lockett T, Winship I, Giles GG, Flander LB, Keogh L, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA (2012) Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 5, 240–7.
Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22030089PubMed |

[13]  Ward PR, Javanparast S, Wilson C (2011) Equity of colorectal cancer screening: which groups have inequitable participation and what can we do about it? Aust J Prim Health 17, 334–46.
Equity of colorectal cancer screening: which groups have inequitable participation and what can we do about it?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22112702PubMed |

[14]  Cole SR, Zajac I, Gregory T, Mehaffey S, Roosa N, Turnbull D, Esterman A, Young GP (2011) Psychosocial variables associated with colorectal cancer screening in South Australia. Int J Behav Med 18, 302–9.
Psychosocial variables associated with colorectal cancer screening in South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20496170PubMed |

[15]  Gregory TA, Wilson C, Duncan A, Turnbull D, Cole SR, Young G (2011) Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer. BMC Public Health 11, 38
Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21232156PubMed |

[16]  Christou A, Katzenellenbogen JM, Thompson SC (2010) Australia’s national bowel cancer screening program: does it work for indigenous Australians? BMC Public Health 10, 373
Australia’s national bowel cancer screening program: does it work for indigenous Australians?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20579344PubMed |

[17]  Ward PR, Javanparast S, Matt MA, Martini A, Tsourtos G, Cole S, et al (2011) Equity of colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 35, 61–5.
Equity of colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 21299702PubMed |

[18]  Martini A, Javanparast S, Ward PR, Baratiny G, Gill T, Cole S, et al (2011) Colorectal cancer screening in rural and remote areas: analysis of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia. Rural Remote Health 11, 1648

[19]  Duncan A, Wilson C, Cole SR, Mikocka-Walus A, Turnbull D, Young GP (2009) Demographic associations with stage of readiness to screen for colorectal cancer. Health Promot J Austr 20, 7–1.

[20]  Weber MF, Cunich M, Smith DP, Salkeld G, Sitas F, O’Connell D (2013) Sociodemographic and health-related predictors of self-reported mammogram, faecal occult blood test and prostate specific antigen test use in a large Australian study. BMC Public Health 13, 429
Sociodemographic and health-related predictors of self-reported mammogram, faecal occult blood test and prostate specific antigen test use in a large Australian study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23641775PubMed |

[21]  Weber MF, Banks E, Ward R, Sitas F (2008) Population characteristics related to colorectal cancer testing in New South Wales, Australia: results from the 45 and Up Study cohort. J Med Screen 15, 137–42.
Population characteristics related to colorectal cancer testing in New South Wales, Australia: results from the 45 and Up Study cohort.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18927096PubMed |

[22]  Javanparast S, Ward PR, Carter SM, Wilson CJ (2012) Barriers to and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in different population subgroups in Adelaide, South Australia. Med J Aust 196, 521–3.
Barriers to and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in different population subgroups in Adelaide, South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 22571311PubMed |

[23]  Tong S, Hughes K, Oldenburg BB, Mar CD (2006) Colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing: community intention, knowledge, beliefs and behaviour. Asia Pac J Public Health 18, 16–23.
Colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing: community intention, knowledge, beliefs and behaviour.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD283it1Sgtg%3D%3D&md5=132d3c062ad4eeec21b048d2fdcfa9fdCAS | 16629434PubMed |

[24]  Becker M (1974) The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 2, 324–473.

[25]  Rosenstock IM. The health belief model: explaining health behavior through expectancies. In Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice (pp. 39–62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1990.

[26]  Simon AE, Forbes LJ, Boniface D, Warburton F, Brain KE, Dessaix A, et al (2012) An international measure of awareness and beliefs about cancer: development and testing of the ABC. BMJ Open 2, e001758
An international measure of awareness and beliefs about cancer: development and testing of the ABC.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23253874PubMed |

[27]  Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2006 census of population and housing: socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA). 2008. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/allprimarymainfeatures/356A4186CCDDC4D1CA257B3B001AC22C?opendocument [Verified 12 June 2014]

[28]  Rizzo L, Brick JM, Park I (2004) A minimally intrusive method for sampling persons in random digit dial surveys. Public Opin Q 68, 267–74.
A minimally intrusive method for sampling persons in random digit dial surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29]  American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Lenexa, Kansas: AAPOR; 2008.

[30]  Forbes LJ, Simon AE, Warburton F, Boniface D, Brain KE, Dessaix A, et al (2013) Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): do they contribute to differences in cancer survival? Br J Cancer 108, 292–300.
Differences in cancer awareness and beliefs between Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): do they contribute to differences in cancer survival?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3szksVeksg%3D%3D&md5=2106ee30ccd1aa40e5c94b287eb2ce32CAS | 23370208PubMed |

[31]  Duncan A, Turnbull D, Gregory T, Cole SR, Young GP, Flight I, Wilson C (2012) Using the Transtheoretical Model of Behaviour Change to describe readiness to rescreen for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood testing. Health Promot J Austr 23, 122–8.

[32]  Paddison JS, Yip MJ (2010) Exploratory study examining barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening. Aust J Rural Health 18, 11–5.
Exploratory study examining barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 20136809PubMed |

[33]  Wardle J, Sutton S, Williamson S, Taylor T, McCaffery K, Cuzick J, Hart A, Atkin W (2000) Psychosocial influences on older adults’ interest in participating in bowel cancer screening. Prev Med 31, 323–34.
Psychosocial influences on older adults’ interest in participating in bowel cancer screening.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FhtlSjug%3D%3D&md5=6411309b17def50f44cea6fc67683a59CAS | 11006057PubMed |

[34]  Power E, Miles A, von Wagner C, Robb K, Wardle J (2009) Uptake of colorectal cancer screening: system, provider and individual factors and strategies to improve participation. Future Oncol 5, 1371–88.
Uptake of colorectal cancer screening: system, provider and individual factors and strategies to improve participation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19903066PubMed |

[35]  Hay JL, Buckley TR, Ostroff JS (2005) The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature. Psychooncology 14, 517–34.
The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: a theoretical and empirical review of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 15490428PubMed |

[36]  Cole SR, Young GP, Byrne D, Guy JR, Morcom J (2002) Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner. J Med Screen 9, 147–52.
Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FktlCnsg%3D%3D&md5=b9481127e0f6283681db6c474037c098CAS | 12518003PubMed |

[37]  Cole SR, Smith A, Wilson C, Turnbull D, Esterman A, Young GP (2007) An advance notification letter increases participation in colorectal cancer screening. J Med Screen 14, 73–5.
An advance notification letter increases participation in colorectal cancer screening.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2svgvVyguw%3D%3D&md5=6adea1d590447e52c661045b135ead42CAS | 17626705PubMed |

[38]  Morrell S, Perez DA, Hardy M, Cotter T, Bishop JF (2010) Outcomes from a mass media campaign to promote cervical screening in NSW, Australia. J Epidemiol Community Health 64, 777–83.
Outcomes from a mass media campaign to promote cervical screening in NSW, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 19822553PubMed |

[39]  Rosenstock IM (1966) Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q 44, 94–127.

[40]  Rauscher GH, Johnson TP, Cho YI, Walk JA (2008) Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17, 748–57.
Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18381468PubMed |