Register      Login
Health Promotion Journal of Australia Health Promotion Journal of Australia Society
Journal of the Australian Health Promotion Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Assessing the potential to combine attitude tracking and health campaign evaluation surveys

Lauren P. Hollier A , Simone Pettigrew B D , Carolyn Minto C , Terry Slevin B C and Mark Strickland C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth WA 6102, Australia.

B School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Perth WA 6102, Australia.

C Cancer Council WA, 420 Bagot Road, Subiaco, Perth WA 6008, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: simone.pettigrew@curtin.edu.au

Health Promotion Journal of Australia 27(2) 170-173 https://doi.org/10.1071/HE15100
Submitted: 12 August 2015  Accepted: 21 December 2015   Published: 6 April 2016

Abstract

Issue addressed: Online surveys are becoming increasingly popular in health research because of the low cost and fast completion time. A large proportion of online survey costs are allocated to setup and administration expenses, which suggests that conducting fewer, longer surveys would be a cost-effective approach. The current study assessed whether the incorporation of a health campaign evaluation survey within a longitudinal attitudes and behaviours tracking survey produced different outcomes compared with the separate administration of the evaluation survey.

Methods: Data were collected via an online panel, with 688 respondents completing the combined survey and 657 respondents completing the evaluation-only survey. Regression analyses were conducted to examine whether survey type was related to the campaign evaluation results.

Results: Those who completed the combined survey perceived the campaign advertisement to be more personally relevant than those completing the evaluation-only survey. There were no differences in results relating to campaign awareness and reported behavioural change as a result of campaign exposure.

Conclusions: There were minimal differences between results obtained from combining an attitude/behaviour tracking survey with a campaign evaluation survey. Any priming or order effects were limited to respondents’ cognitive responses to the advertisement.

So what?: The results suggest that health practitioners with limited resources available for tracking and evaluation research may be able to maximise outcomes by administering fewer, longer surveys.

Key words: online survey, priming, questionnaire design, survey length.


References

[1]  Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. UK: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.

[2]  Perez D, Kite J, Dunlop SM, Cust AE , Goumas C, Cotter T, Walsberger SC, Dessaix A, Bauman A (2015) Exposure to the ‘Dark Side of Tanning’ skin cancer prevention mass media campaign and its association with tanning attitudes in New South Wales, Australia. Health Educ Res 30, 336–46.
Exposure to the ‘Dark Side of Tanning’ skin cancer prevention mass media campaign and its association with tanning attitudes in New South Wales, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25697580PubMed |

[3]  Leavy JE, Rosenberg M, Barnes R, Bauman A, Bull FC (2013) Would you find thirty online? Website use in a Western Australian physical activity campaign. Health Promot J Austr 24, 118–25.
Would you find thirty online? Website use in a Western Australian physical activity campaign.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC2c7gvFWiuw%3D%3D&md5=5dea362966f2c75775f4056252377bb8CAS | 24168738PubMed |

[4]  McPeake J, Bateson M, O’Neill A (2014) Electronic surveys: how to maximise success. Nurse Res 21, 24–6.
Electronic surveys: how to maximise success.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24460562PubMed |

[5]  Deutskens E, de Ruyter K, Wetzels M, Oosterveld P (2004) Response rate and response quality of Internet-based surveys: an experimental study. Mark Lett 15, 21–36.
Response rate and response quality of Internet-based surveys: an experimental study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Yang S-M, Hinkle J. Issues in survey design: using surveys of victimization and fear of crime as examples. In Gideon L, editor. Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences (pp.443–62). New York: Springer 2012.

[7]  Couper MP, Conrad FG, Tourangeau R (2007) Visual context effects in web surveys. Public Opin Q 71, 623–34.
Visual context effects in web surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Lasorsa DL (2003) Question-order effects in surveys: the case of political interest, news attention, and knowledge. Journalism Mass Commun Q 80, 499–512.
Question-order effects in surveys: the case of political interest, news attention, and knowledge.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Tourangeau R, Singer E, Presser S (2003) Context effects in attitude surveys: effects on remote items and impact on predictive validity. Sociol Methods Res 31, 486–513.
Context effects in attitude surveys: effects on remote items and impact on predictive validity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Van De Walle S, Van Ryzin GG (2011) The order of questions in a survey on citizen satisfaction with public services: lessons from a split ballot experiment. Public Adm Dev 89, 1436–50.
The order of questions in a survey on citizen satisfaction with public services: lessons from a split ballot experiment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Sudman S, Bradburn NM, Schwarz N. Thinking about answers: the application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1996.

[12]  Schwarz N (1999) Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 54, 93–105.
Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Lee S, Schwarz N (2014) Question context and priming meaning on health: effect on differences in self-rated health between Hispanics and non-Hipsanic whites. Am J Public Health 104, 179–85.
Question context and priming meaning on health: effect on differences in self-rated health between Hispanics and non-Hipsanic whites.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23678900PubMed |

[14]  Lee S, Schwarz N, Goldstein LS (2014) Culture-sensitive question order effects of self-rated health between older Hispanic and non-Hispanic adults in the United States. J Aging Health 26, 860–83.
Culture-sensitive question order effects of self-rated health between older Hispanic and non-Hispanic adults in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24812265PubMed |

[15]  Fan W, Yan Z (2010) Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: a systematic review. Comput Human Behav 26, 132–9.
Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  Galesic M, Bosnjak M (2009) Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web-survey. Public Opin Q 73, 349–60.
Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web-survey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Ziegenfuss JY, Niederhauser BD, Kallmes D, Beebe TJ (2013) An assessment of incentive versus survey length trade-offs in a web survey of radiologists. J Med Internet Res 15, e49
An assessment of incentive versus survey length trade-offs in a web survey of radiologists.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23514869PubMed |

[18]  Marcus B, Bosnjak M, Lindner S, Pilischenko S, Schütz A (2007) Compensating for low topic interest and long surveys: a field experiment on non-response in web surveys. SocSciComput Rev 25, 372–83.
Compensating for low topic interest and long surveys: a field experiment on non-response in web surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  Diepgen TL, Mahler V (2002) The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 146, 1–6.
The epidemiology of skin cancer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11966724PubMed |

[20]  Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Socio-economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA). 2011 Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/seifa [Verified 19 June 2015].