Changes in nematode populations on sugarcane following fallow, fumigation and crop rotation, and implications for the role of nematodes in yield decline
G. R. Stirling, B. L. Blair, J. A. Pattemore, A. L. Garside and M. J. Bell
Australasian Plant Pathology 30(4) 323 - 335
Abstract
A multi-disciplinary research program has been established in Australia to
identify the causes of sugarcane yield decline (defined as ‘the loss in
productive capacity of sugarcane-growing soils under long-term
monoculture’). In one part of that program, five experiments were set up
in which the monoculture was broken for 12–42 months by maintaining a
bare fallow using herbicides, by growing a grass/legume pasture or by
planting consecutive crops, most of which were legumes. Other plots were
maintained in continuous sugarcane during the break period and were either
fumigated with methyl bromide immediately before replanting to sugarcane, or
left untreated. Nematode populations were monitored in the following sugarcane
crop. These data showed that for the first 6 months after planting,
fumigation, bare fallow and crop generally reduced populations of
Pratylenchus zeae Graham in comparison to continuous
sugarcane. Pasture had a similar effect but it was only apparent at, or soon
after, planting. Fumigation and bare fallow initially decreased populations of
most other plant-parasitic nematodes, but some ectoparasitic species
[e.g. Tylenchorhynchus annulatus (Cassidy) Golden
and Paratylenchus colbrani (Raski)] returned to
relatively high population densities within 6–12 months following these
treatments at some sites. Pasture generally increased populations of
free-living nematodes in comparison to continuous sugarcane whereas a decrease
was sometimes observed following fumigation and bare fallow. All treatments
increased the yield of the plant plus first ratoon crop by 20–30%
compared with continuous sugarcane, indicating that soil factors affected by
fumigation and break crops were having widespread and significant effects on
sugar production in Australia. A reduction in nematode populations may have
contributed to the yield responses at some sites but it is impossible to be
conclusive because treatments also affected many other soil physical, chemical
and biological properties.
Keywords: free-living nematodes, Nematoda, trophic groups.
Full text doi:10.1071/AP01044
© CSIRO 2001





Australasian Plant Disease Notes
