CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Australasian Plant Pathology   
Australasian Plant Pathology
  Research in all branches of plant pathology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Content
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues

 Australasian Plant Disease Notes
Disease notes, new records and quarantine interception reports are published in Australasian Plant Disease Notes.

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 34(1)

Reassessment of Phomopsis species on grapevines

J. M. van Niekerk A, J. Z. Groenewald A B, D. F. Farr C, P. H. Fourie A, F. Halleen D, P. W. Crous A B E

A Department of Plant Pathology, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa.
B Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C USDA-ARS, Systematic Botany & Mycology Laboratory, Rm 304, Bldg 011A, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
D Disease Management, ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij, Private Bag X5026, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa.
E Corresponding author. Email: crous@cbs.knaw.nl
 
 Full Text
 PDF (651 KB)
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Ten species of Phomopsis have previously been identified from grapevines. Of these, P. viticola, the causal agent of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot, and P. vitimegaspora, the causal agent of swelling arm of grapevines, have been confirmed as severe pathogens of this host. Earlier taxonomic treatments of Phomopsis species chiefly distinguished taxa based on host specificity, cultural characteristics and morphology. More recent studies have indicated, however, that these characteristics can no longer be used to distinguish species of Phomopsis due to the wide host ranges of some species, and the morphological plasticity of others. Using morphology, DNA sequences (ITS-1, 5.8S, ITS-2) and pathogenicity data, 15 Phomopsis spp. were distinguished from grapevines in the present study. Diaporthe helianthi, a known pathogen of sunflowers, is for the first time reported from grapevines. A further six, presently unknown species of Phomopsis, are also distinguished from grapevines. A phylogenetic analysis of ITS data generated in this study distinguished three clades containing isolates previously identified as D. perjuncta. Based on type studies, the name D. viticola can be applied to collections from Portugal and Germany. A new species, D. australafricana, is proposed for South African and Australian isolates formerly treated as D. perjuncta or D. viticola. A description for D. perjuncta is provided based on newly designated lectotype and epitype specimens. D. perjuncta is distinguished from D. viticola and D. australafricana based on morphology and DNA phylogeny. Artificial inoculations of green grapevine shoots indicated that, of the species tested, P. amygdali, a known pathogen of peaches in the USA, and P. viticola were the most virulent.

Keywords: Phomopsis, grapevines, Diaporthe perjuncta, taxonomy.


   
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012