CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Crop & Pasture Science
  Continuing Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
You are here: Journals > Crop & Pasture Science   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Editorial Contacts
Sites of Interest
Print Publication Dates
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Deep drainage and land use systems. Model verification and systems comparison

Zahra Paydar A D, Neil Huth B, Anthony Ringrose-Voase A, Rick Young C, Tony Bernardi C, Brian Keating B and Hamish Cresswell A

A CSIRO Land and Water, GPO Box 1666, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
B CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems/APSRU, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.
C NSW Department of Primary Industries, Tamworth Agricultural Institute, RMB 944, Calala Lane, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: Zahra.Paydar@csiro.au


Abstract

Deep drainage or drainage below the bottom of the profile usually occurs when rain infiltrates moist soil with insufficient capacity to store the additional water. This drainage is believed to be contributing to watertable rise and salinity in some parts of the Liverpool Plains catchment in northern New South Wales. The effect of land use on deep drainage was investigated by comparing the traditional long fallow system with more intense ‘opportunity cropping’. Long fallowing (2 crops in 3 years) is used to store rainfall in the soil profile but risks substantial deep drainage. Opportunity cropping seeks to lessen this risk by sowing whenever there is sufficient soil moisture. Elements of the water balance and productivity were measured under various farming systems in a field experiment for 4 years in the southern part of the catchment. The experimental results were used to verify APSIM (Agricultural Production Systems Simulator) by comparing them with predictions of production, water storage, and runoff. The verification procedure also involved local farmers and agronomists who assessed the credibility of the predictions and suggested modifications. APSIM provided a realistic simulation of common farming systems in the region and could capture the main hydrological and biological processes. APSIM was then used for long-term (41 years) simulations to predict deep drainage under different systems and extrapolate experimental results. The results showed large differences between agricultural systems mostly because differences in evapotranspiration contributed to differences in profile moisture when it rained. The model predicted that traditional long fallow farming systems (2 crops in 3 years) are quite ‘leaky’, with average annual deep drainage of 34 mm. However, by planting crops in response to the depth of moist soil (opportunity or response cropping), APSIM predicted a much smaller annual drainage rate of 6 mm. Opportunity cropping resulted in overall greater water use and increased production compared with long fallowing. Furthermore, modelling indicated that average annual deep drainage under continuous sorghum (3 mm) is much less than under either long fallow cropping or continuous wheat (39 mm), demonstrating the importance of including summer cropping, as well as increasing cropping frequency, to reducing deep drainage.

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56(9) 995–1007    doi:10.1071/AR04303
Submitted: 10 December 2004    Accepted: 24 June 2005    Published: 28 September 2005





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (339 KB) $25
Export Citation
Cited by
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010