CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Crop & Pasture Science
  Continuing Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
You are here: Journals > Crop & Pasture Science   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Editorial Contacts
Sites of Interest
Print Publication Dates
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

Genotypic variation for drought stress response traits in soybean. II. Inter-relations between epidermal conductance, osmotic potential, relative water content, and plant survival

A. T. James A, R. J. Lawn B D and M. Cooper C

A Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072; now CSIRO Plant Industry, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.
B Tropical Crop Science Unit, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, and CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Davies Laboratory, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia.
C Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072; now Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., PO Box 1004, Johnston, IA 50131, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email Robert.Lawn@jcu.edu.au


Abstract

As part of a project exploring the potential for using leaf physiological traits to improve drought tolerance in soybean, studies were conducted to explore whether epidermal conductance (ge), osmotic potential (π), and relative water content (RWC) influenced turgor maintenance and ultimately the survival of droughted plants. In a glasshouse study, plants of 8 soybean genotypes that showed different expression of the traits were grown in well watered soil-filled beds for 21 days and then exposed to terminal water deficit stress. The trends in each trait were then monitored periodically until plant death. Genotypic differences were observed in the rate of decline in RWC as the soil dried, in the temporal patterns of change in ge and π, in the duration of survival after watering ceased, and in the critical relative water content (RWCC) at which plants died. In general, ge became smaller and π became more negative as RWC declined and plants acclimated to the increasing stress. Genotypic differences in ge remained broadly consistent as RWC declined. In contrast, the genotypic rankings for π in stressed plants were poorly correlated with those for well watered plants, indicating differential genotypic capacity for osmotic adjustment (OA) in response to stress. Survival times among genotypes after stress commenced ranged from 27 to 41 days, while RWCC ranged from 49% down to 41%. The differences in survival time among the genotypes were able to be explained by genotypic differences in the rate of decline in RWC and in the RWCC, using a multiple linear regression relationship (R 2 = 0.94**). In turn, genotypic differences in the rate of decline in RWC were positively correlated (r = 0.75*) with ge at 70% RWC, and with OA over the drying period (r = 0.98**). In a second study in a controlled environment facility, leaf area retention at 90% soil water extraction was greatest in the one genotype that combined low ge, high OA, and low RWCC. Overall, the responses from the two studies were consistent with the hypothesis that turgor maintenance and ultimately leaf and plant survival of different genotypes during advanced stages of drought stress are enhanced by low ge, high OA capacity, and low RWCC.

Keywords: breeding, drought resistance, leaf survival, turgor maintenance, physiology.

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59(7) 670–678    doi:10.1071/AR07160
Submitted: 19 April 2007    Accepted: 18 March 2008    Published: 3 July 2008





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
PDF (193 KB) $25
Export Citation
Cited by
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010