CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Crop & Pasture Science   
Crop & Pasture Science
Journal Banner
  Plant Sciences, Sustainable Farming Systems & Food Quality
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
New Editor-in-Chief
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Farrer Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

red arrow Farrer Reviews
blank image

Invited Farrer Review Series. More...


red arrow PrometheusWiki
blank image
PrometheusWiki
Protocols in ecological and environmental plant physiology

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 20(1)

Corrigendum - Response to partial selection on clean fleece weight in South Australian strong-wool Merino sheep

O Mayo, JC Potter, RE Brady and CW Hooper

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20(1) 151 - 167
Published: 1969

Abstract

This paper reports the results of an experiment carried out at Roseworthy Agricultural College from 1953 to 1966 comparing two bases of selection of rams: (1) visual appraisal (the "visual" method); (2) visual culling of 70% of rams followed by selection of breeding animals from the remaining 30% on the basis of clean fleece weight (the "index" method). No selection for fleece weight was practiced on ewes. Seven rams were used in each of the two flocks, and six of the seven were replaced each year by 16-month-old animals from the succeeding drop, the seventh being a year older.

Rams used for breeding in the Index flock were significantly higher in clean fleece weight than those of the Visual flock, and were higher, though not always significantly so, in greasy fleece weight. This led to a divergence between the flocks for clean fleece weight (P < 0.05), with an increase of c. 0.05 lb per year per head for the Index animals over the Visual animals. The Index rams were more wrinkly and lighter, on the whole, than the Visual rams, and the wrinkly effect carried over into their offspring with a slight divergence apparent, the Index animals becoming more wrinkled than the Visual (P < 0.05). In fibre diameter there were no differences between selected animals or between flocks. Visual rams tended to have more crimps per inch in their wool, and this was observed in the flocks also, but the divergence was not significant (P > 0.05). Index rams had longer wool than Visual rams, with the difference generally significant within years, and this tendency carried over in a lesser manner to the flocks. Fleece density was generally greater in the Index group, though not usually significantly so.

This experiment did not include a randomly bred control flock, but was rather designed to compare two practical methods of selecting rams. Merits of this scheme are discussed in the light of both groups' failure to show increases in fleece weight over the course of the experiment



Full text doi:10.1071/AR9690151c

© CSIRO 1969

blank image >
 
PDF (18 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013