CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Crop & Pasture Science   
Crop & Pasture Science
  Plant Sciences, Sustainable Farming Systems & Food Quality
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Most Read Papers
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Farrer Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 PrometheusWiki
PrometheusWiki
Protocols in ecological and environmental plant physiology

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 41(4)

Estimation of Cell Birth Rate in the Wool Follicle Bulb using Colchicine Metaphase Arrest or DNA Labelling with Bromodeoxyuridine

PI Hynd and BK Everett

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 41(4) 741 - 740

Abstract

The birth rate of cells in the wool follicle cells (CBR) was measured in two experiments on sheep differing widely in wool growth rate as a consequence of differences in nutritional regime. In Experiment 1, CBR was determined in one sheep on a high and one on a low plane of nutrition by two methods: the colchicine-metaphase arrest method, or from the product of total cell number and cell cycle time (the latter determined by DNA labelling with 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and analysis of the fraction of mitoses labelled curve). CBR by colchicine was 0.73 and 0.56 of that determined using BrdU for the low- and high-plane sheep respectively. Cell cycle times were 26.5 h (low nutrition) to 18.6 h (high nutrition). In Experiment 2, CBR was again measured by the colchicine method, and from the rate of increase in labelled cells following a pulse dose of BrdU, in sheep on two levels of nutrition (n = 4llevel) and with a 3.7-fold difference in wool growth rate. Again, CBR by colchicine was only 0.41 (high nutrition) to 0.74 (low nutrition) of estimates made using the BrdU method, this difference being statistically significant only for sheep on the high plane of nutrition. Nutrition significantly altered CBR determined by colchicine (Pc0.001) and by BrdU (Pc0.034). The rate of fibre growth per follicle measured on two separate occasions was closely related to CBR measured using colchicine (r= 0.83, P< 0.01 and 0.8 1, P c 0.02) or BrdU (r= 0.73, P c 0.04 and 0.64, P< 0.08). It is concluded that CBR is a major determinant of fibre growth, but that colchicine depresses CBR. Previous estimates of mitotic activity in wool follicle bulbs have been made using colchicine and are thus probably underestimated. The technique using BrdU labelling and the subsequent rate of increase in labelled cells appears to be a useful one for estimating follicle cell kinetics.



Full text doi:10.1071/AR9900741

© CSIRO 1990

 
PDF (534KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012