CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Crop & Pasture Science   
Crop & Pasture Science
  Plant Sciences, Sustainable Farming Systems & Food Quality
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Most Read Papers
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Farrer Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notice to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 PrometheusWiki
PrometheusWiki
Protocols in ecological and environmental plant physiology

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 60(9)

Site-specific variation in wheat grain protein concentration and wheat grain yield measured on an Australian farm using harvester-mounted on-the-go sensors

Brett M. Whelan A C, James A. Taylor A, James A. Hassall B

A Australian Centre for Precision Agriculture, McMillan Building A05, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
B ‘Kiewa’, Gilgandra, NSW 2827, Australia.
C Corresponding author. Email: b.whelan@usyd.edu.au
 
PDF (2 MB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Accurately measuring and understanding the fine-scale relationship between wheat grain yield (GY) and the concomitant grain protein concentration (GPC) should provide valuable information to improve the management of nitrogen inputs. Here, GPC and GY were monitored on-harvester for three seasons across 27 paddocks on an Australian farming enterprise using two independent, on-the-go sensing systems. A Zeltex Accuharvest measured GPC (%) and a John Deere GreenStar system measured GY (t/ha). Local calibration in each season for Australian spring wheat significantly improved the prediction accuracy, precision, and bias of the Zeltex Accuharvest when compared with the initial factory calibration. Substantial variation in GPC and GY was recorded at the field scale, with the least variation recorded in both parameters in the wetter season. GY (CV = 38%) was twice as variable on average as GPC (CV = 19%) across the enterprise. At this enterprise scale, a negative correlation between GPC and GY was observed for a composite of the field data from all seasons (r = –0.48); however, at the within-field scale the relationship was shown to vary from positive (max. = +0.41) to negative (min. = –0.65). Spatial variation in GPC and GY at the within-field scale was described best in the majority of cases by an exponential semivariogram model. Within-field spatial variability in GPC is more strongly autocorrelated than GY but on average they share a similar autocorrelated range (a′ = ~190 m). This spatial variability in GPC and GY gave rise to local spatial variation in the correlation between GPC and GY, with 85% of the fields registering regions of significant negative correlations (P < 0.01) and significant positive correlations observed in 70% of fields. The spatial pattern in these regions of significantly different correlations is shown to display spatial coherence from which inferences regarding the relative availability of soil nitrogen and moisture are suggested. The results point to the suitability of these on-the-go sensors for use in more sophisticated agronomic and environmentally targeted nitrogen-use analysis.

Keywords: precision agriculture, nitrogen, management.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012