Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
REVIEW

Assessing the place and role of crop simulation modelling in Australia

M. J. Robertson A B E , G. J. Rebetzke A C and R. M. Norton D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Agriculture Flagship.

B PMB 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia.

C PO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

D International Plant Nutrition Institute, 54 Florence Street, Horsham, Vic. 3400. Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: michael.robertson@csiro.au

Crop and Pasture Science 66(9) 877-893 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP14361
Submitted: 19 December 2014  Accepted: 3 May 2015   Published: 4 September 2015

Abstract

Computer-based crop simulation models (CSMs) are well entrenched as tools for a wide variety of research, development and extension applications. Despite this, critics remain and there are perceptions that CSMs have not contributed to impacts on-farm or in the research community, particularly with plant breeding. This study reviewed the literature, interviewed 45 stakeholders (modellers, institutional representatives and clients of modelling), and analysed the industry-funded project portfolio to ascertain the current state of use of CSMs in the grains industry in Australia, including scientific progress, impacts and development needs. We found that CSMs in Australia are widely used, with ~100 active and independent users, ~15 model developers, and at any one time ~10 postgraduate students, chiefly across six public research institutions. The dominant platform used is APSIM (Agricultural Production Systems Simulator). It is widely used in the agronomic domain. Several cases were documented where CSM use had a demonstrable impact on farm and research practice. The updating of both plant and soil process routines in the models has slowed and even stalled in recent years, and scientific limitations to future use were identified: the soil–plant nitrogen cycle, root growth and function, soil surface water and residue dynamics, impact of temperature extremes on plant function, and up-to-date cultivar parameter sets. There was a widespread appreciation of and optimism for the potential of CSMs to assist with plant-breeding activities, such as environmental characterisation, trait assessment, and design of plant-breeding programs. However, we found little evidence of models or model output being used by plant breeders in Australia, despite significant impacts that have emerged recently in larger international breeding programs. Closer cooperation between geneticists, physiologists and breeders will allow gene-based approaches to characterise and parameterise cultivars in CSMs, demonstrated by recent progress with phenology in wheat. This will give models the ability to deal with a wider range of potential genotype × environment × management scenarios.

Additional keywords: APSIM, decision support system, genetics, phenology, physiology, soils.


References

Abeledo LG, Calderini DF, Slafer GA (2011) Modelling yield response of a traditional and a modern barley cultivar to different water and nitrogen levels in two contrasting soil types. Crop & Pasture Science 62, 289–298.
Modelling yield response of a traditional and a modern barley cultivar to different water and nitrogen levels in two contrasting soil types.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Asseng S, van Herwaarden AF (2003) Analysis of the benefits to wheat yield from assimilates stored prior to grain filling in a range of environments. Plant and Soil 256, 217–229.
Analysis of the benefits to wheat yield from assimilates stored prior to grain filling in a range of environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXot1ClsLY%3D&md5=f226668bbfcfdb0385ba2c7b0caa9033CAS |

Asseng S, Bar-Talb A, Bowden JW, Keating BA, Van Herwaarden A, Palta JA, Huth NI, Probert ME (2002) Simulation of grain protein content with APSIM-Nwheat. European Journal of Agronomy 16, 25–42.
Simulation of grain protein content with APSIM-Nwheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XktFGnuw%3D%3D&md5=86d583e670331b930d256ba2b87bee1aCAS |

Barlow KM, Christy BP, O’Leary GJ, Riffkin PA, Nuttall JG (2015) Simulating the impact of extreme heat and frost events on wheat crop production: A review. Field Crops Research 171, 109–119.
Simulating the impact of extreme heat and frost events on wheat crop production: A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bell LW, Lilley JM, Hunt JR, Kirkegaard JA (2015) Optimising grain yield and grazing potential of crops across Australia’s high rainfall zone: A simulation analysis. 1. Wheat. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 332–348.
Optimising grain yield and grazing potential of crops across Australia’s high rainfall zone: A simulation analysis. 1. Wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bogard M, Ravel C, Paux E, Bordes J, Balfourier F, Chapman S (2014) Predictions of heading date in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using QTL-based parameters of an ecophysiological model. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 5849–5865.
Predictions of heading date in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using QTL-based parameters of an ecophysiological model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXis12ru7Y%3D&md5=05606c2b0b07d3ecd7f649be1529878aCAS | 25148833PubMed |

Boote KJ, Kropff MJ, Bindraban PS (2001) Physiology and modelling of traits in crop plants: implications for genetic improvement. Agricultural Systems 70, 395–420.
Physiology and modelling of traits in crop plants: implications for genetic improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bouma J, Jones JW (2001) An international collaborative network for agricultural systems applications (ICASA). Agricultural Systems 70, 355–368.
An international collaborative network for agricultural systems applications (ICASA).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown HE, Jamieson PD, Brooking IR, Moot DJ, Huth NI (2013) Integration of molecular and physiological models to explain time of anthesis in wheat. Annals of Botany 112, 1683–1703.
Integration of molecular and physiological models to explain time of anthesis in wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvVKns7vF&md5=eeec551cc6161d131f8aa4efc2f2c045CAS | 24220102PubMed |

Cammarano D, Payero J, Basso B, Stefanova L, Grace P (2012) Adapting wheat sowing dates to projected climate change in the Australian subtropics: analysis of crop water use and yield. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 974–986.
Adapting wheat sowing dates to projected climate change in the Australian subtropics: analysis of crop water use and yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cane K, Eagles HA, Laurie DA, Trevaskis B, Vallance N, Eastwood RF, Martin PJ (2013) Ppd-B1 and Ppd-D1 and their effects in southern Australian wheat. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 100–114.
Ppd-B1 and Ppd-D1 and their effects in southern Australian wheat.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtVWhtr3E&md5=1307ccbe9f8ca739c0f0d472a3bd7be4CAS |

Carberry PS, Littleboy M, Keating BA (1998) Evaluation of the status of existing farm production and cropping system models. In ‘Farming action: catchment reaction’. (Eds J Williams, RA Hook, HL Gascoigne) pp. 274–292. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Carberry PS, Hochman Z, McCown RL, Dalgliesh NP, Foale MA, Poulton PL, Hargreaves JNG, Hargreaves DMG, Cawthray S, Hillcoat NS, Robertson MJ (2002) The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers, advisers, researchers, monitoring, simulation, communication and performance evaluation. Agricultural Systems 74, 141–177.
The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers, advisers, researchers, monitoring, simulation, communication and performance evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chapman SC (2008) Use of crop models to understand genotype by environment interactions for drought in real-world and simulated plant breeding trials. Euphytica 161, 195–208.
Use of crop models to understand genotype by environment interactions for drought in real-world and simulated plant breeding trials.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chapman SC, Cooper M, Podlich D, Hammer G (2003) Evaluating plant breeding strategies by simulating gene action and dryland environment effects. Agronomy Journal 95, 99–113.
Evaluating plant breeding strategies by simulating gene action and dryland environment effects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chauhan YS, Wright GC, Rachaputi RCN, Holzworth D, Broome A, Krosch S, Robertson MJ (2010) Application of a model to assess aflatoxin risk in peanuts. The Journal of Agricultural Science 148, 341–351.
Application of a model to assess aflatoxin risk in peanuts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXltlentLg%3D&md5=63cd0e726f314c382f01d7544db7e698CAS |

Chauhan YS, Solomon KF, Rodriguez D (2013) Characterization of north-eastern Australian environments using APSIM for increasing rainfed maize production. Field Crops Research 144, 245–255.
Characterization of north-eastern Australian environments using APSIM for increasing rainfed maize production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chenu K, Cooper M, Hammer GL, Mathews KL, Dreccer MF, Chapman SC (2011) Environment characterization as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype–environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australia. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 1743–1755.
Environment characterization as an aid to wheat improvement: interpreting genotype–environment interactions by modelling water-deficit patterns in North-Eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXjsFyis7w%3D&md5=764a9b9a14a8b9127a2209949b7cc090CAS | 21421705PubMed |

Chenu K, Deihimfard R, Chapman SC (2013) Large‐scale characterization of drought pattern: a continent‐wide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheatbelt—spatial and temporal trends. New Phytologist 198, 801–820.
Large‐scale characterization of drought pattern: a continent‐wide modelling approach applied to the Australian wheatbelt—spatial and temporal trends.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23425331PubMed |

Christy B, O’Leary G, Riffkin P, Acuna T, Potter T, Clough A (2013) Long-season canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars offer potential to substantially increase grain yield production in south-eastern Australia compared with current spring cultivars. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 901–913.
Long-season canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars offer potential to substantially increase grain yield production in south-eastern Australia compared with current spring cultivars.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cooper M, Stucker RE, DeLacy IH, Harch BD (1997) Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop Science 37, 1168–1176.
Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cooper M, van Eeuwijk FA, Hammer GL, Podlich DW, Messina C (2009) Modeling QTL for complex traits: detection and context for plant breeding. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 12, 231–240.
Modeling QTL for complex traits: detection and context for plant breeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjsVOguro%3D&md5=f254d404bbb2d0f736f89547c4acd4d2CAS | 19282235PubMed |

Cooper M, Messina CD, Podlich D, Totir LR, Baumgarten A, Hausmann NJ, Graham G (2014a) Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction. Crop & Pasture Science 65, 311–336.
Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXotVKnsbk%3D&md5=f1c7fa3d58a49739707b52fd5f0e25ecCAS |

Cooper M, Gho C, Leafgren R, Tang T, Messina C (2014b) Breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids for the US corn-belt: discovery to product. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 6191–6204.
Breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids for the US corn-belt: discovery to product.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXitl2gsbs%3D&md5=4d757462127ef69be551324f0a41726dCAS | 24596174PubMed |

Dalgliesh NP, Foale MA, McGown RL (2009) Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 2. Pragmatic provision of soil information for paddock-specific simulation and farmer decision making. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 1031–1043.
Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 2. Pragmatic provision of soil information for paddock-specific simulation and farmer decision making.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dunbabin VM, Airey M, Diggle AJ, Renton M, Rengel Z, Armstrong R, Chen Y, Siddique KHM (2011) Simulating the interaction between plant roots, soil water and nutrient flows, and barriers and objects in soil using ROOTMAP. In ‘Proceedings 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2011)’. 12–16 December 2011, Perth, W. Aust. (Eds F Chan, D Marinova, RS Anderssen) pp. 1652–1658. (Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand)

Edwards J, Umbers A, Wentworth S (2013) GRDC Farm Practices Survey Report 2012. Grains Research and Development Corporation, Canberra, ACT.

French RJ, Schultz JE (1984) Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment: 1. The relationship between yield, water use and climate. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35, 743–764.
Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment: 1. The relationship between yield, water use and climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hammer GL, Holzworth DP, Stone R (1996) The value of skill in seasonal climate forecasting to wheat crop management in a region with high climatic variability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 717–737.
The value of skill in seasonal climate forecasting to wheat crop management in a region with high climatic variability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hammer GL, Kropff MJ, Sinclair TR, Porter JR (2002) Future contributions of crop modelling—from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 15–31.
Future contributions of crop modelling—from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hammer GL, Chapman S, van Oosterom E, Podlich DW (2005) Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems. Crop & Pasture Science 56, 947–960.
Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hammer GL, van Oosterom E, McLean G, Chapman SC, Broad I, Harland P, Muchow RC (2010) Adapting APSIM to model the physiology and genetics of complex adaptive traits in field crops. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 2185–2202.
Adapting APSIM to model the physiology and genetics of complex adaptive traits in field crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXmsVGnsr0%3D&md5=5904f4b7545fefa00ae59c526ee67aa1CAS | 20400531PubMed |

Hammer G, Messina C, van Oosterom E, Chapman C, Singh V, Borrell A, Jordan D, Cooper M (2015) Molecular breeding for complex adaptive traits—how integrating crop ecophysiology and modelling can enhance efficiency. In ‘Crop systems biology: Narrowing the gap between genotype and phenotype’. (Eds X Yin, P Struik) In press. (Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Harrison MT, Evans JR, Moore AD (2012) Using a mathematical framework to examine physiological changes in winter wheat after livestock grazing: 2. Model validation and effects of grazing management. Field Crops Research 136, 127–137.
Using a mathematical framework to examine physiological changes in winter wheat after livestock grazing: 2. Model validation and effects of grazing management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hayman P, Crean J, Mullen J, Parton K (2007) How do probabilistic seasonal climate forecasts compare with other innovations that Australian farmers are encouraged to adopt? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 975–984.
How do probabilistic seasonal climate forecasts compare with other innovations that Australian farmers are encouraged to adopt?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hayman PT, Whitbread AM, Gobbett DL (2010) The impact of El Niño Southern Oscillation on seasonal drought in the southern Australian grainbelt. Crop & Pasture Science 61, 528–539.
The impact of El Niño Southern Oscillation on seasonal drought in the southern Australian grainbelt.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXosVKjs70%3D&md5=68f71512e06c60445e2c782156a31d93CAS |

Hochman Z, Carberry PS (2011) Emerging consensus on desirable characteristics of tools to support farmers’ management of climate risk in Australia. Agricultural Systems 104, 441–450.
Emerging consensus on desirable characteristics of tools to support farmers’ management of climate risk in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hochman Z, Dang YP, Schwenke GD, Dalgliesh NP, Routley R, McDonald M, Daniells IG, Manning W, Poulton PL (2007) Simulating the effects of saline and sodic subsoils on wheat crops growing on Vertosols. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 802–810.
Simulating the effects of saline and sodic subsoils on wheat crops growing on Vertosols.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hochman Z, Holzworth D, Hunt JR (2009a) Potential to improve on-farm wheat yield and WUE in Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 708–716.
Potential to improve on-farm wheat yield and WUE in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hochman Z, van Rees H, Carberry PS, Hunt JR, McCown RL, Gatmann A, Holzworth D, van Rees S, Dalgleish NP, Long W, Peake AS, Poulton PL, McClelland T (2009b) Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 4. Yield Prophet® helps farmers monitor and manage crops in a variable climate. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 1057–1070.
Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 4. Yield Prophet® helps farmers monitor and manage crops in a variable climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hochman Z, Gobbett D, Holzworth D, McClelland T, van Rees H, Marinoni O, Garcia JN, Horan H (2013) Quantifying yield gaps in rainfed cropping systems: A case study of wheat in Australia. Field Crops Research 143, 65–75.
Quantifying yield gaps in rainfed cropping systems: A case study of wheat in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holzworth DP, Huth NI, deVoil PG, Zurcher EJ, Herrmann NI, McLean G, Chenu K, van Oosterom EJ, Snow V, Murphy C, Moore AD, Brown H, Whish JPM, Verrall S, Fainges J, Bell LW, Peake AS, Poulton PL, Hochman Z, Thorburn PJ, Gaydon DS, Dalgliesh NP, Rodriguez D, Cox H, Chapman S, Doherty A, Teixeira E, Sharp J, Cichota R, Vogeler I, Li FY, Wang E, Hammer GL, Robertson MJ, Dimes JP, Whitbread AM, Hunt J, van Rees H, McClelland T, Carberry PS, Hargreaves JNG, MacLeod N, McDonald C, Harsdorf J, Wedgwood S, Keating BA (2014a) APSIM—Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environmental Modelling & Software 62, 327–350.
APSIM—Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holzworth DP, Snow V, Janssen S, Athanasiadis IN, Donatelli M, Hoogenboom G, White J, Thorburn P (2014b) Agricultural production systems modelling and software: current status and future prospects. Environmental Modelling & Software
Agricultural production systems modelling and software: current status and future prospects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | (In press).

Hunt JR, Kirkegaard JA (2011) Re-evaluating the contribution of summer fallow rain to wheat yield in southern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 62, 915–929.
Re-evaluating the contribution of summer fallow rain to wheat yield in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hunt JR, Fettell NA, Midwood J, Breust P, Peries R, Gill J, Paridaen A (2012) Optimising flowering time, phase duration, HI and yield of milling wheat in different rainfall zones of southern Australia. In ‘Capturing opportunities and overcoming obstacles in Australian agronomy. Proceedings 16th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference’. 14–18 October 2012, Armidale, NSW. (The Regional Institute: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2012/crop-development/8186_huntjr.htm

Hunt JR, Browne C, McBeath TM, Verburg K, Craig S, Whitbread AM (2013) Summer fallow weed control and residue management impacts on winter crop yield though soil water and N accumulation in a winter-dominant, low rainfall region of southern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 64, 922–934.
Summer fallow weed control and residue management impacts on winter crop yield though soil water and N accumulation in a winter-dominant, low rainfall region of southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvVGms7fM&md5=765be9cd8f70fd77dba793114455cae8CAS |

Huth NI, Bristow KL, Verburg K (2012) SWIM3: model use, calibration, and validation. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 55, 1303–1313.

Jakku E, Thorburn PJ (2010) A conceptual framework for guiding the participatory development of agricultural decision support systems. Agricultural Systems 103, 675–682.
A conceptual framework for guiding the participatory development of agricultural decision support systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jeuffroy MH, Casadebaig P, Debaeke P, Loyce C, Meynard JM (2014) Agronomic model uses to predict cultivar performance in various environments and cropping systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34, 121–137.
Agronomic model uses to predict cultivar performance in various environments and cropping systems. A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jones CA, Bland WL, Ritchie JT, Williams JR (1991) Simulation of root growth. In ‘Modelling plant and soil systems’. (Eds RJ Hanks, JT Ritchie) pp. 74–101. (ASA: Madison, WI, USA)

Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT (2003) DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 235–265.
DSSAT cropping system model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kirkegaard JA, Hunt JR, McBeath TM, Lilley JM, Moore A, Verburg K, Robertson M, Oliver O, Whitbread AM (2014) Improving water productivity in the Australian Grains industry—a nationally coordinated approach. Crop & Pasture Science 65, 583–601.
Improving water productivity in the Australian Grains industry—a nationally coordinated approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kragt ME, Pannell DJ, Robertson MJ, Thamo T (2012) Assessing costs of soil carbon sequestration by crop-livestock farmers in Western Australia. Agricultural Systems 112, 27–37.
Assessing costs of soil carbon sequestration by crop-livestock farmers in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kumar SR, Hammer GL, Broad I, Harland P, McLean G (2009) Modelling environmental effects on phenology and canopy development of diverse sorghum genotypes. Field Crops Research 111, 157–165.
Modelling environmental effects on phenology and canopy development of diverse sorghum genotypes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lawes RA, Ward PR, Ferris D (2014) Pasture cropping with C4 grasses in a barley–lupin rotation can increase production. Crop & Pasture Science 65, 1002–1015.
Pasture cropping with C4 grasses in a barley–lupin rotation can increase production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lilley JL, Kirkegaard JA (2011) Benefits of increased soil exploration by wheat roots. Field Crops Research 122, 118–130.
Benefits of increased soil exploration by wheat roots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lilley JL, Kirkegaard JA, Robertson MJ, Probert ME, Angus J, Howe G (2003) Simulating crop and soil processes in crop sequences in southern NSW. In ‘Solutions for a better environment. Proceedings 11th Australian Agronomy Conference’. 2–6 February 2003, Geelong, Vic. (Eds M Unkovich, G O’Leary) (The Regional Institute: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2003/c/12/lilley.htm

Lilley JM, Bell LW, Kirkegaard JA (2015) Optimising grain yield and grazing potential of crops across Australia’s high rainfall zone: A simulation analysis. 2. Canola. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 349–364.
Optimising grain yield and grazing potential of crops across Australia’s high rainfall zone: A simulation analysis. 2. Canola.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Luo Z, Wang E, Sun OJ, Smith CJ, Probert ME (2011) Modeling long-term soil carbon dynamics and sequestration potential in semi-arid agro-ecosystems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151, 1529–1544.
Modeling long-term soil carbon dynamics and sequestration potential in semi-arid agro-ecosystems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Manschadi AM, Christopher J, Hammer GL (2006) The role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments. Functional Plant Biology 33, 823–837.
The role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XptVClsbY%3D&md5=a990d24732874596d9d4b041f70e8c5dCAS |

Maywald GF, Sutherst RW, Zalucki M (1999) ‘DYMEX Professional: Modelling natural systems. Version 1.0.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

McCown RL, Hochman Z, Carberry PS (2002) Probing the enigma of the decision support system for farmers: Learning from experience and from theory. Agricultural Systems 74, 1–10.
Probing the enigma of the decision support system for farmers: Learning from experience and from theory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCown RL, Carberry PS, Hochman Z, Dalgliesh NP, Foale MA (2009) Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 1. Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research. Crop & Pasture Science 60, 1017–1030.
Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 1. Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Messina C, Hammer G, Dong Z, Podlich D, Cooper M (2009) Modelling crop improvement in a G*E*M framework via gene-trait-phenotype relationships. In ‘Crop physiology: applications for genetic improvement and agronomy’. pp. 235–265. (Academic Press: Waltham, MA, USA)

Messina CD, Podlich D, Dong Z, Samples M, Cooper M (2011) Yield-trait performance landscapes: from theory to application in breeding maize for drought tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 855–868.
Yield-trait performance landscapes: from theory to application in breeding maize for drought tolerance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtVekurs%3D&md5=ebde5f55e98f9c3f1634611f831e5e05CAS | 21041371PubMed |

Moeller C, Asseng S, Berger J, Milroy SP (2009) Plant available soil water at sowing in Mediterranean environments—Is it a useful criterion to aid nitrogen fertiliser and sowing decisions? Field Crops Research 114, 127–136.
Plant available soil water at sowing in Mediterranean environments—Is it a useful criterion to aid nitrogen fertiliser and sowing decisions?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nelson RA, Holzworth DP, Hammer GL, Hayman PT (2002) Infusing the use of seasonal climate forecasting into crop management practice in North East Australia using discussion support software. Agricultural Systems 74, 393–414.
Infusing the use of seasonal climate forecasting into crop management practice in North East Australia using discussion support software.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nuttall JG, O’Leary GJ, Khimashia N, Asseng S, Fitzgerald G, Norton R (2012) ‘Haying-off’ in wheat is predicted to increase under a future climate in south-eastern Australia. Crop & Pasture Science 63, 593–605.
‘Haying-off’ in wheat is predicted to increase under a future climate in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

O’Leary GJ, Connor DJ (1996) A simulation model of the wheat crop in response to water and nitrogen supply. I. Model construction. Agricultural Systems 52, 1–29.
A simulation model of the wheat crop in response to water and nitrogen supply. I. Model construction.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oliver YM, Robertson MJ (2009) Quantifying the benefits of accounting for yield potential in spatially and seasonally- responsive nutrient management in a Mediterranean climate. Australian Journal of Soil Research 47, 114–126.
Quantifying the benefits of accounting for yield potential in spatially and seasonally- responsive nutrient management in a Mediterranean climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhvFagurY%3D&md5=a17029664edb40cb671a59f268972700CAS |

Oliver YM, Robertson MJ (2013) Quantifying the spatial pattern of the yield gap within a farm in a low rainfall Mediterranean climate. Field Crops Research 150, 29–41.
Quantifying the spatial pattern of the yield gap within a farm in a low rainfall Mediterranean climate.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Passioura JB (1996) Simulation models: science, snake oil, education, or engineering? Agronomy Journal 88, 690–694.
Simulation models: science, snake oil, education, or engineering?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Peake AS, Huth NA, Kelly AM, Bell KL (2013) Variation in water extraction with maize plant density and its impact on model application. Field Crops Research 146, 31–37.
Variation in water extraction with maize plant density and its impact on model application.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Peake AS, Huth NI, Carberry PS, Raine SR, Smith RJ (2014) Quantifying potential yield and lodging-related yield gaps for irrigated spring wheat in sub-tropical Australia. Field Crops Research 158, 1–14.
Quantifying potential yield and lodging-related yield gaps for irrigated spring wheat in sub-tropical Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Phelan DC, Parsons D, Lisson SN, Holz GK, MacLeod ND (2014) Beneficial impacts of climate change on pastoral and broadacre agriculture in cool-temperate Tasmania. Crop & Pasture Science 65, 194–205.
Beneficial impacts of climate change on pastoral and broadacre agriculture in cool-temperate Tasmania.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Probert ME, Dimes JP, Keating BA, Dalal RC, Strong WM (1998) APSIM’s water and nitrogen modules and simulation of the dynamics of water and nitrogen in fallow systems. Agricultural Systems 56, 1–28.
APSIM’s water and nitrogen modules and simulation of the dynamics of water and nitrogen in fallow systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rebetzke GJ, Biddulph B, Chenu K, Deery D, Mayer J, Moeller C, Bennett D, Rattey A (2013) Development of a multisite, managed environment facility for targeted trait and germplasm evaluation. Functional Plant Biology 40, 1–13.
Development of a multisite, managed environment facility for targeted trait and germplasm evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robertson M, Carberry PS (2010) The evolving role of crop modelling in agronomy research. In ‘Food security from sustainable agriculture. Proceedings 15th Agronomy Conference’. 15–18 November 2010, Lincoln, New Zealand. (Eds H Dove, RA Culvenor) (The Regional Institute: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2010/farming-systems/simulation-decision-support/7001_robertson.htm

Robertson MJ, Kirkegaard JA (2005) Water use efficiency of dryland canola in an equi-seasonal rainfall environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 1373–1386.
Water use efficiency of dryland canola in an equi-seasonal rainfall environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robertson MJ, Carberry PS, Lucy M (2000) Evaluation of cropping options using a participatory approach with on-farm monitoring and simulation: a case study of spring-sown mungbeans. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51, 1–12.
Evaluation of cropping options using a participatory approach with on-farm monitoring and simulation: a case study of spring-sown mungbeans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Robertson MJ, Bathgate A, Moore AD, Lawes R, Lilley J (2009) Seeking simultaneous improvements in farm profit and natural resource indicators: a modelling analysis. Animal Production Science 49, 826–836.
Seeking simultaneous improvements in farm profit and natural resource indicators: a modelling analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rosenzweig C, Jones JW, Hatfield JL, Ruanea AC, Boote KJ, Thorburn P, Antle JM, Nelson GC, Porter C, Janssen C, Asseng S, Basso B, Ewert F, Wallach D, Baigorria G, Winter JM (2013) The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and pilot studies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 170, 166–182.
The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP): Protocols and pilot studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sadras VO, Rodriguez D (2010) Modelling the nitrogen-driven trade-off between nitrogen utilisation efficiency and water use efficiency of wheat in eastern Australia. Field Crops Research 118, 297–305.
Modelling the nitrogen-driven trade-off between nitrogen utilisation efficiency and water use efficiency of wheat in eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Semenov MA, Martre P, Jamieson PD (2009) Quantifying effects of simple wheat traits on yield in water-limited environments using a modelling approach. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 149, 1095–1104.
Quantifying effects of simple wheat traits on yield in water-limited environments using a modelling approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shorter R, Lawn RJ, Hammer GL (1991) Improving genetic adaptation in crops: a role for breeders, physiologists and modellers. Experimental Agriculture 27, 155–175.
Improving genetic adaptation in crops: a role for breeders, physiologists and modellers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sinclair TR, Seligman NG (1996) Crop modeling: from infancy to maturity. Agronomy Journal 88, 698–704.
Crop modeling: from infancy to maturity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stapper M (1984) ‘SIMTAG: A simulation model of wheat genotypes. Model documentation.’ p. 108. (ICARDA: Aleppo, Syria; University of New England: Armidale, NSW)

Stöckle CO, Donatelli M, Nelson R (2003) CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 289–307.
CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Stone PJ, Hochman Z (2004) If interactive decision support systems are the answer, have we been asking the right questions? In ‘New directions for a diverse planet: Proceedings 4th International Crop Science Congress’. 26 Sept.–1 Oct. 2004, Brisbane, Qld. (The Regional Institute: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/au/asa/2004/symposia/4/3/1680_stonepj.htm

Suleiman AA, Ritchie JT (2003) Modeling soil water redistribution during second-stage evaporation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67, 377–386.
Modeling soil water redistribution during second-stage evaporation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXkslChs78%3D&md5=30919da475bf8c96c4f9ec951b68ed34CAS |

Sylvester-Bradley R, Riffkin P, O’Leary G (2012) Designing resource-efficient ideotypes for new cropping conditions: Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the High Rainfall Zone of southern Australia. Field Crops Research 125, 69–82.
Designing resource-efficient ideotypes for new cropping conditions: Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the High Rainfall Zone of southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thorburn PJ, Probert ME, Robertson FA (2001) Modelling decomposition of sugar cane surface residues with APSIM-Residue. Field Crops Research 70, 223–232.
Modelling decomposition of sugar cane surface residues with APSIM-Residue.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thorburn PJ, Biggs JS, Collins K, Probert ME (2010) Using the APSIM model to estimate nitrous oxide emissions from diverse Australian sugarcane production systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 136, 343–350.
Using the APSIM model to estimate nitrous oxide emissions from diverse Australian sugarcane production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXisFenurg%3D&md5=0363bc0e608311f67b517fe6e2d1c88bCAS |

van Ittersum MK, Donatelli M (2003) Modelling cropping systems—highlights of the symposium and preface to the special issues. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 187–197.
Modelling cropping systems—highlights of the symposium and preface to the special issues.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Oosterom EJ, Borrell AK, Chapman SC, Broad IJ, Hammer GL (2010a) Functional dynamics of the nitrogen balance of sorghum. I. Nitrogen demand of vegetative plant parts. Field Crops Research 115, 19–28.
Functional dynamics of the nitrogen balance of sorghum. I. Nitrogen demand of vegetative plant parts.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Oosterom EJ, Chapman SC, Borrell AK, Broad IJ, Hammer GL (2010b) Functional dynamics of the nitrogen balance of sorghum. II. Grain filling period. Field Crops Research 115, 29–38.
Functional dynamics of the nitrogen balance of sorghum. II. Grain filling period.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Rees H, McClelland T, Hochman Z, Carberry P, Hunt J, Huth N, Holzworth D (2014) Leading farmers in South East Australia have closed the exploitable wheat yield gap: Prospects for further improvement. Field Crops Research 164, 1–11.
Leading farmers in South East Australia have closed the exploitable wheat yield gap: Prospects for further improvement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Verburg K, Bond WJ, Hirth JR, Ridley AM (2007) Lucerne in crop rotations on the Riverine Plains. 3. Model evaluation and simulation analyses. Journal of Agricultural Research 58, 1129–1141.

Verburg K, Bond WJ, Hunt JR (2012) Fallow management in dryland agriculture: Explaining soil water accumulation using a pulse paradigm. Field Crops Research 130, 68–79.
Fallow management in dryland agriculture: Explaining soil water accumulation using a pulse paradigm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang E, Smith CJ (2004) Modelling the growth and water uptake function of plant root systems: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 501–523.
Modelling the growth and water uptake function of plant root systems: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang E, van Oosterom E, Meinke H, Asseng S, Robertson MJ, Huth NI, Keating BA, Probert ME (2003) The new APSIM-wheat model—performance and future improvements. In ‘Proceedings 11th Australian Agronomy Conference’. 2–6 Feb. 2003, Geelong, Vic. (The Regional Institute: Gosford, NSW) Available at: www.regional.org.au/asa/2003

Wang J, van Ginkel M, Trethowan R, Ye G, DeLacy I, Podlich D, Cooper M (2004) Simulating the effects of dominance and epistasis on selection response in the CIMMYT Wheat Breeding Program using QuCim. Crop Science 44, 2006–2018.
Simulating the effects of dominance and epistasis on selection response in the CIMMYT Wheat Breeding Program using QuCim.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wang E, Bell M, Luo Z, Moody P, Probert ME (2014) Modelling crop response to phosphorus inputs and phosphorus use efficiency in a crop rotation. Field Crops Research 155, 120–132.
Modelling crop response to phosphorus inputs and phosphorus use efficiency in a crop rotation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wark T, Corke P, Sikka P, Klingbeil L, Guo Y, Crossman C, Valencia P, Swain D, Bishop-Hurley G-H (2007) Transforming agriculture through pervasive wireless sensor networks. IEEE Pervasive Computing 6, 50–57.
Transforming agriculture through pervasive wireless sensor networks.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Weeks A, Christy B, Lowell K, Beverly C (2008) The Catchment Analysis Tool: demonstrating the benefits of interconnected biophysical models. In ‘Landscape analysis and visualisation’. (Eds C Pettit, W Cartwright, I Bishop, K Lowell, D Pullar, D Duncan) pp. 49–71. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)

Whish J, Butler G, Castor M, Cawthray S, Broad I, Carberry PS, Hammer GL, McLean G, Routley R, Yeates S (2005) Modelling the effects of row configuration on sorghum yield reliability in north-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 11–23.
Modelling the effects of row configuration on sorghum yield reliability in north-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams JR, Renard KG, Dyke PT (1983) EPIC—a new method for assessing erosion’s effect on soil productivity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 38, 381–383.

Woodruff DR (1992) WHEATMAN: a decision support system for wheat management in subtropical Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 1483–1499.
WHEATMAN: a decision support system for wheat management in subtropical Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wright GC, Baker GA, Fleischfresser D, Cruickshank A (2011) “Tingoora”—A high oleic ultra early maturing variety bred for drought and aflatoxin avoidance. Proceedings of the American Peanut Research and Extension Society 33, 79

Yin X, Stam P, Kropff MJ, Schapendonk AH (2003) Crop modeling, QTL mapping, and their complementary role in plant breeding. Agronomy Journal 95, 90–98.
Crop modeling, QTL mapping, and their complementary role in plant breeding.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXhsFyisrY%3D&md5=f5f665c233342720d10423283af3c9c5CAS |

Zheng B, Biddulph B, Li D, Kuchel H, Chapman S (2013) Quantification of the effects of VRN1 and Ppd-D1 to predict spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) heading time across diverse environments. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 3747–3761.
Quantification of the effects of VRN1 and Ppd-D1 to predict spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) heading time across diverse environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXht1yrsrzJ&md5=7a167c2eaf3f2cdd4d919644b9f84d08CAS | 23873997PubMed |