CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

Training

Publication Workshops


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 20(6)

Characterisation of pulses of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2alpha (PGFM) and relationships between PGFM pulses and luteal blood flow before, during, and after luteolysis in mares

O. J. Ginther A B D, B. L. Rodrigues A, J. C. Ferreira A, R. R. Araujo A C, M. A. Beg B

A Eutheria Foundation, Cross Plains, WI 53528, USA.
B Department of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
C Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
D Corresponding author. Email: ginther@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu
 
PDF (274 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Blood collections for characterising 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF2alpha (PGFM) pulses in mares and colour-Doppler examinations for estimating percentage of corpus luteum with blood-flow signals were done hourly for a 24-h session on Day 15 (ovulation = Day 0; n = 13 mares) or during 12-h sessions from Days 12 to 16 (n= 10 mares). Luteolysis was defined as extending from the beginning of a precipitous decrease in progesterone until progesterone was <2 ng mL–1. Comparisons were made among preluteolysis, luteolysis, and postluteolysis. Greater prostaglandin F2α activity (mean PGFM concentration per session) occurred during luteolysis than during preluteolysis and postluteolysis. Statistically-detected PGFM pulses were smaller during preluteolysis with a highly variable interval from the last pulse to the beginning of luteolysis. Either two or three pulses were detected in each 24-h session during luteolysis and postluteolysis, after excluding three of eight sessions with no pulses during postluteolysis. Statistically, 17% of pulses during postluteolysis were prominent outliers. The nadir-to-nadir interval during a pulse (5 h), the peak-to-peak interval between pulses (9 h), and the resulting 4-h gap between pulses were similar during and after luteolysis. The decrease in progesterone encompassed the PGFM pulses, without a detectable fluctuation during a pulse. The percentage of corpus luteum with blood-flow signals did not change during the ascending portion of a PGFM pulse and decreased within 2 or 3 h after the peak, even during preluteolysis. Results indicated that a reported increase in luteal blood flow in heifers during the ascending portion of a PGFM pulse does not occur in mares.

Keywords: corpus luteum.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012