CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 16(2)

109 REFREEZING STALLION SPERMATOZOA FOR ASSISTED REPRODUCTION

P.M. McCue A, A.I. Moore A, J.E. Bruemmer A

Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, USA. email: pmccue@colostate.edu
 
 Full Text
 PDF (252 KB)
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Equine semen is commonly frozen in 0.5-mL straws at a concentration of 400 million spermatozoa per mL. Equine pregnancies have been produced in the past few years using assisted reproduction techniques that require very few sperm, such as sperm injection and gamete intrafallopian transfer. Consequently, thawing even a single straw would waste a high percentage of the sperm. The goals of this study were to: (1) evaluate the motility and viability of cryopreserved spermatozoa that had been thawed and refrozen, and (2) compare the effect of serial dilution on refreezing parameters. It was hypothesized that both motility and viability would be significantly decreased as a consequence of refreezing, but sufficient live, motile spermatozoa would be present for assisted reproductive techniques. Semen from six stallions of mixed light horse breeds was collected, evaluated, and frozen in lactose-EDTA in 0.5-mL straws. Semen from each stallion was subsequently thawed, held at room temperature for 10 minutes, and then refrozen in 0.25-mL straws. Additional semen from the initial freeze was thawed, diluted in the original extender, and refrozen at concentrations of 40 × 106, 4 × 106, 4 ×  105, and 4 × 104 spermatozoa per mL. Refrozen semen was evaluated for motility visually and by CASA. Viability of refrozen semen was determined by flow cytometry following staining with propidium iodide (PI). Percentages of motile spermatozoa prior to freezing, after the first freezing, and after the second freezing were compared using the PROC GLM model in SAS. All values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Total motility decreased sigificantly (P < 0.05) from 91.8 ± 3.1% prior to freezing to 64.2 ± 7.7% after the first freezing and 45.7 ± 10.4% after the second freezing. However, only a tendency (P = 0.09) toward a decrease in sperm viability following refreezing as measured by PI staining was noted. Dilution of sperm prior to refreezing did not significantly effect (P > 0.05) subsequent motility or viability parameters. This study demonstrated that refrozen equine semen retained approximately 70% of the initial post-thaw motility. Dilution prior to refreezing would allow for the reallocation of a single 0.5-mL straw into hundreds or thousands of smaller straws for future use in assisted reproduction. Refreezing would allow for the judicious use of valuable stallion semen in limited supply.

   
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012