CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 e-Alerts
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 17(2)

109 A BRIDGE OF SPERM TAIL BETWEEN BLASTOMERES ENHANCED PROTEIN MIGRATION IN THE RAT TWO-CELL STAGE EMBRYOS

N. Kashiwazaki A, A. Takizawa A, S. Hisamatsu A, Y. Akamatsu A, M. Shino A, S. Sonoki A, T. Inomata A

AGraduate School, Azabu University, Fuchinobe, 229-8501, Japan. Email: nkashi@azabu-u.ac.jp
 
 Full Text
 PDF (248 KB)
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine transient expression of transgene injected into nuclei of rat 2-cell stage embryos. We also investigated the relationship between expression in both blastomeres and tail position of penetrated spermatozoa in rat 2-cell stage embryos. Rat 2-cell stage embryos were recovered from superovulated Wistar females mated with same strain mature males at 48 h after hCG injection. DNA fragments, as the transgene containing the EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) gene controlled under the CMV-IE promoter, were microinjected into one nucleus of 2-cell stage embryos. After microinjection, embryos were cultured in KRB at 37.0°C in a 5% CO2 and 95% humidified air until observation. First, transient EGFP expression in 151 injected embryos was observed using a fluorescence microscope at 6 h intervals until 48 h after injection. At 6 h after microinjection fluorescent embryos were detected, and the proportion of fluorescent embryos increased over time. The rate reached maximum (84%, 52/62) at 24 h after microinjection, and several fluorescent patterns of fluorescent blastomeres in the embryos were observed. There were blastomeres with the same or different fluorescence levels and a single fluorescent blastomere. Second, to assess tail position of the penetrated sperm in the fluorescent embryos, 75 whole mount specimens were observed by inverted phase-contrast microscopy at 24 h after the injection. Also, parthenogenetic 2-cell stage embryos that never contained sperm tail were microinjected with the transgene and observed in the same manner. To obtain parthenogenetic 2-cell embryos, 80 ovulated ova were collected from non-mated females, and incubated with 2 mM 6-DMAP for 4 h. The ova were additionally cultured for 20 h in KRB at 37.0°C in a 5% CO2 and 95% humidified air. In embryos with both blastomeres fluorescent (94%, 33/35), the sperm tail existed in both blastomeres like a bridge between blastomeres. In contrast, in one embryo with a single fluorescent blastomere (4%, 1/24), the sperm tail existed in both blastomeres, and in other embryos with a single fluorescent blastomere (75%, 18/24), the sperm tail was positioned in the one blastomere. On the other hand, in 63 parthenogenic rat 2-cell embryos in which there was no sperm tail, most embryos (86%, 54/63) had a single fluorescent blastomere at 24 h after microinjection. The results indicated that the sperm tail position in the 2-cell embryos makes the protein migration variable. In conclusion, when the CMV-IE/EGFP gene was microinjected into nuclei of rat 2-cell embryos, at 24 h after the microinjection the EGFP was detected in most embryos; however, fluorescent patterns in blastomeres varied. It seems that EGFP derived from the transgene injected into one blastomere may move into another blastomere in rat 2-cell stage embryos, and that the presence of a sperm tail in both blastomeres may influence EGFP distribution.

   
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012