CSIRO Publishing Home Books & CDs Journals About Us Shopping Cart
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  An international journal at the forefront of reproduction and developmental science
You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   
Journal Home
General Information
Scope
Editorial Board
Editorial Contacts
Print Publication Dates
Online Content
For Authors
For Referees
How to Order

 Most Read
Visit our Most Read page regularly to keep up-to-date with the most downloaded papers in this journal.

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 

5 NEUTRAL SEGREGATION OF DONOR CELL MITOCHONDRIA IN FETAL AND ADULT TISSUES OF SOMATIC CELL CLONES IN CATTLE

F. Viramontes A, F. Filion A and L.C. Smith A

ACentre de Recherche en Reproduction Animale (CRRA), Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Québec, J2S 7C6 Canada. Email: viramf@hotmail.com


Abstract

Until now, animal cloning has been extremely inefficient: only 1–2% of nuclear transfer (NT) clones survive to birth. Some of these anomalies may be related to an incompatibility between nuclear and mitochondrial genes (Cummins JM 2001 Hum. Reprod. Update 7, 217–228). Controversy exists as to the levels of donor cell mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) inheritance in somatic clones (heteroplasmy). Whereas some researchers found very low quantities (0.1–4%) (Steinborn R et al. 2000 Nat. Genet. 25, 255–257), others found levels of heteroplasmy ranging from 6 to 40% (Takeda et al. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 64, 429–437). Since it remains unclear whether mtDNA segregation is neutral or selective, the purpose of this study was to analyze the transmission of the mtDNA from donor somatic cells in fetal and adult clones using a particular mtDNA marker (mtDNA Bos taurus with one mutation in the D-loop of 40 base pairs plus than the wild type). Fibroblasts from a fetus of 60 days were used as donor cells. The fetus was produced by artificial insemination of a Holstein (Bos taurus) heifer carrying an mtDNA mutation with semen from a Zebu (Bos indicus) bull. Oocytes derived from slaughterhouse ovaries of Holstein cows carrying wild-type mtDNA were used as recipient cells. The presence of the mutated mtDNA from the donor cell (heteroplasmy) was analyzed in a male cloned fetus of 60 days and in three adult male clones at 18 months of age. Heteroplasmy was detected in 7 tissues in the foetus: muscle, skin, stomach, testicle, thymus, tongue, and umbilical cord. Three tissues were analyzed from the adult clones: semen, skin, and white blood cells. Heteroplasmy was detected in all the tissues by nested PCR amplification of the D-loop and analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. The mean (%) of the mutated mtDNA of the donor cell in the seven tissues of the 60-day-old fetus was 1.14 ± 0.34 (SEM). There was no differences in the means of heteroplasmy (%) between the tissues of the fetus (P > 0.05). The mean level of heteroplasmy in the three adult clones analyzed (clones A, B, and C) was 1.41 ± 0.18 (SEM). Analysis of heteroplasmy between the tissues of each clone showed no differences (P > 0.05) with the exception of clone B, where semen was different (P < 0.05) from white blood cells. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) between some clones (taking together all the results of all tissues of each clone). The heteroplasmy in clone B (%) (2.59 ± 0.18 SEM) was different (P < 0.05) from that of both clone A (1.04 ± 0.18) and clone C (1.46 ± 0.18). There was no difference between the heteroplasmy (%) of clone A and that of clone C (P > 0.05). These results show that the tissues of the fetus and the adult clones were heteroplasmic at similar levels, suggesting neutral segregation of the donor cell mtDNA during development and tissue differentiation.

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 17(2) 153–153    doi:10.1071/RDv17n2Ab5
Submitted: 1 August 2004    Accepted: 1 October 2004    Published: 1 January 2005





   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 View
Issue Contents
Full Text
PDF (149 KB)
Export Citation
 Tools
Print
Email this page
    


 
Top  Email this page
 


Legal & Privacy | Sitemap | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2010