Register      Login
Reproduction, Fertility and Development Reproduction, Fertility and Development Society
Vertebrate reproductive science and technology
RESEARCH ARTICLE

364 DISTRIBUTION OF OVULATION AND SUBSEQUENT EMBRYO PRODUCTION USING LUTROPIN AND ESTRADIOL-17β FOR TIMED AI OF SUPERSTIMULATED BEEF FEMALES

W. Larkin A C , P. Chesta B , C. Looney A , G. Bo B and D. Forrest C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Ovagenix, LP, Navasota, TX 77868, USA

B Instituto de Reproduccion Animal Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina

C Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18(2) 289-290 https://doi.org/10.1071/RDv18n2Ab364
Published: 14 December 2005

Abstract

This experiment was designed to compare timing of ovulation and embryo production between traditional superstimulatory and AI methods and the use of additional treatments of Estradiol-17β and pLH (Lutropin; Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) to facilitate timed AI in beef cows. A total of 31 mature cross-bred beef cows were randomly assigned three treatments. On Day 0, experimental cows were selected upon transrectal ultrasound evaluation for corpus leutum (>10 mm) prior to CIDR insertion plus 2.5 mg estradiol-17β and 50 mg Progesterone i.m. Superstimulatory treatments with Folltropin-V (Bioniche Animal Health) began on Day 4 for 3.5 days (236 mg NIH-FSH-P10) in decreasing dosages (7 injections at 0700 and 1900). All cows received prostaglandin F (PGF) treatments of 625 mcg D-cloprostenol i.m. (Estrumate; Schering-Plough, Union, NJ, USA) in both AM and PM on Day 6, and CIDRs were removed in AM of Day 7, followed by the final injection of Folltropin. In addition, Heat Watch patches (Heat Watch; Cow Chips, Denver, CO, USA) were applied to optimize heat detection. Donors selected as control treatment were AI at 12 and 24 h post-onset of estrus (first mount) with frozen semen from the same bull. Donors selected on the Estradiol-17β treatment received 1 mg i.m. 12 h after CIDR removal and timed AI at 24 and 36 h. Donors selected for Lutropin treatment received 12.5 mg (5cc i.m.) 24 h after CIDR removal and were timed AI at 12 and 24 h. All AI procedures used 2 units from the same bull. All cows were examined by ultrasonography every 8 h beginning 24 h post-CIDR removal and ending at 60 h to determine the time and distribution of ovulation. Ovulation was determined by the disappearance of follicles (>12 mm) from the prior examination. All AI and ultrasound procedures were performed by the same technician. There were no differences detected between the three treatments as evaluated by all the variables we studied (Table 1). However, donors treated with Lutropin tended to produced more viable embryos per collection and had a tighter degree of distribution of ovulations. Donors treated with Estradiol-17β tended to have fewer viable embryos. More research is needed to determine if donors can be timed AI without regard to estrus.


Table 1. Mean onset of estrus, distribution of ovulation, and embryo production in superstimulated beef donors treated with Estradiol-17β, and Lutropin
Click to zoom