CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

Training

Publication Workshops


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 19(1)

16 PROGESTERONE RELEASE PATTERNS FROM CUE-MATE IN COMPARISON TO OTHER INTRAVAGINAL PROGESTERONE-RELEASING DEVICES IN LACTATING DAIRY COWS

D. Rogan, M. F. Martinez, G. A. Bo, P. Chesta, F. Feresin and R. J. Mapletoft

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 19(1) 126 - 127

Abstract

Various intravaginal progesterone-releasing devices are commercially available and each is impregnated with different amounts of progesterone. An experiment was designed to characterize plasma progesterone release profiles from Cue-Mate in comparison with other commercially available progesterone-releasing devices. Cycling, lactating Holstein cows (n = 60; BCS between 2.0 and 3.0 out of 5) from commercial dairy farms in Argentina were used in 2 replicates. All cows received 2 injections of D+ cloprostenol (PGF, Bioprost-D®; Biotay, Buenos Aires, Argentina) 14 days apart and were randomly assigned to one of four groups to receive intravaginal devices as follows: Cue-Mate (1.56 g progesterone; Bioniche Animal Health, A/Asia Pty, Armidale, Australia; n = 10), DIB (1 g progesterone; Syntex SA, Argentina; n = 10), CIDR with 1.9 g progesterone (Pfizer Salud Animal S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina; n = 10), or CIDR with 1.38 g progesterone (Pfizer Animal Health, Groton, CT, USA; n = 10). All devices were inserted 24 hours after the second PGF and were left in place for 31 days. Blood samples were taken for progesterone analysis at 6-hour intervals for the first 24 hours, then daily for a week, and every 2 days for an additional 25 days. Plasma progesterone concentrations were measured with a modified human double-antibody RIA kit (DPC Coat-A-Count®; Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Cows were observed twice daily to confirm that vaginal inserts were still in place. Time-series hormone data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure for repeated measures (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Main effects of device and time, the highest mean concentration of progesterone, and the mean day on which this occurred were compared by a protected LSD test. There was no evidence of cow discomfort with any of the vaginal devices, and loss rates did not differ. There was an effect of group (P < 0.001) and day (P < 0.001) for progesterone concentrations, but there was no interaction (P = 0.89). Peak concentrations of progesterone (ng mL-1) did not differ among groups (Cue-Mate: 5.0 ± 1.1; DIB: 3.9 ± 0.6; 1.9-g CIDR: 4.6 ± 0.6; 1.38-g CIDR: 3.7 ± 0.4; P = 0.51). Mean (± SEM) concentrations of progesterone over the 31-day insertion period differed between 1.9-g CIDR (1.8 ± 0.2 ng mL-1) and DIB (1.5 ± 0.1 ng mL-1, P < 0.006), with Cue-Mate (1.5 ± 0.2 ng mL-1) and 1.38-g CIDR (1.6 ± 0.1 ng mL-1) intermediate and not different from either. When data were evaluated from insertion until Day 7, mean plasma progesterone concentrations did not differ among groups (Cue-Mate: 2.2 ± 0.2 ng mL-1; DIB: 2.2 ± 0.1 ng mL-1; 1.9-g CIDR: 2.6 ± 0.2 ng mL-1; 1.38-g CIDR: 2.1 ± 0.1 ng mL-1). However, progesterone concentrations from insertion until Day 21 were higher (P < 0.03) in cows with a 1.9-g CIDR (2.1 ± 0.1 ng mL-1) than in those with a DIB (1.6 ± 0.1 ng mL-1) or a 1.38-g CIDR (1.6 ± 0.1 ng mL-1), with Cue-Mate (1.7 ± 0.1 ng mL-1) intermediate and not different. Based on progesterone release patterns, it was concluded that Cue-Mate intravaginal devices can be used in protocols for synchronization of estrus and ovulation as with other progesterone-releasing devices.



Full text doi:10.1071/RDv19n1Ab16

© CSIRO 2007

 
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012