CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Reproduction, Fertility and Development   
Reproduction, Fertility and Development
  Vertebrate Reproductive Science & Technology
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Instructions to Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our email Early Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

Training

Publication Workshops


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 20(1)

17 INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS OF PROGESTERONE DURING FIXED-TIME ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION PROTOCOLS ON OVULATION AND PREGNANCY RATES IN NELORE HEIFERS

M. F. Pegorer, R. L. Ereno and C. M. Barros

Reproduction, Fertility and Development 20(1) 89 - 89

Abstract

Previous reports indicate that a high concentration of serum progesterone (P4) decreases LH pulse frequency (Burke et al. 1996 Anim. Reprod. Sci. 45, 13–28) and, consequently, follicular growth. This may reduce the efficiency of fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocols that utilize P4 in Bos indicus heifers (Marques et al. 2005 Acta Sci. Vet.). The objective of the present work was to evaluate the influence of different P4 concentrations on the ovulation and pregnancy rates of zebu heifers subjected to hormonal protocols for FTAI. Four hormonal protocols with different P4 concentrations were used to induce synchronization of ovulation in Nelore (Bos indicus) heifers (n = 292). Before the beginning of the treatments, the animals were subjected to ovary evaluations by ultrasonography (Aloka SSD 500, 5-MHz probe; Aloka, Tokyo, Japan) twice in an interval of 10 days. Only heifers with a corpus luteum (CL) in at least one of the ultrasonographic evaluations were utilized. At a random stage of the estrous cycle, the selected heifers received an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device containing 0.558 g of P4 [Triu®, Biogenesis, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Treatment 1 (T1); n = 76], or 1 g of P4 [Cronipress®, Biogenesis; Treatment 2 (T2); n = 70], or 0.558 g of P4 and prostaglandin F (PGF) [150 ¼g d-cloprostenol, IM, Croniben®, Biogenesis; Treatment 3 (T3), n = 75], or 1 g of P4 and PGF [Treatment 4 (T4), n = 71]. At the time of intravaginal device insertion (Day 0 = D0), all animals received 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB, Bioestrogen®, IM, Biogenesis), and PGF was administered only in animals from groups T3 and T4. Eight days later (D8), PGF (0.150 g d-cloprostenol) was administered to all heifers and the P4 source was removed. Twenty-four h after removal of the intravaginal device, the heifers were treated with EB (1 mg, IM), and 30 to 36 h later all animals were fixed-time inseminated (FTAI, D10), without estrus detection. In a subset of heifers from each group (T1 = 28; T2 = 34; T3 = 33; T4 = 31), ovarian ultrasonography was performed on D9 (at 8:00 A.M.) and D11 (at 14:00 P.M.) in order to determine ovulation rate after each treatment. The data were analyzed by logistic regression (GENPROC, SAS; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Ovulation rates after treatments T1, T2, T3, and T4, were, respectively, 71.4% (20/28), 76.5% (26/34), 84.9% (28/33), and 70.9% (22/31), and there was no significant difference among groups (P > 0.05). Pregnancy rates, ascertained by ultrasonography 40 days after AI, were 30.2% (23/76), 25.7% (18/70), 33.3% (25/75), and 28.2% (20/71), respectively, for T1, T2, T3, and T4, and likewise there was no significant difference among groups (P > 0.05). It is concluded that reduction of progesterone concentration in the intravaginal device (1 g v. 0.558 g) associated or not with administration of PGF at the beginning of treatments did not significantly influence ovulation and pregnancy rates in Nelore heifers submitted to a FTAI protocol. Additional experiments are underway to confirm or not the present results.

This work was supported by FAPESP (Brazil) and BIOGENESIS (Argentina).



Full text doi:10.1071/RDv20n1Ab17

© CSIRO 2008

 
 Export Citation
 Print
  
  
    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012