CSIRO Publishing blank image blank image blank image blank imageBooksblank image blank image blank image blank imageJournalsblank image blank image blank image blank imageAbout Usblank image blank image blank image blank imageShopping Cartblank image blank image blank image You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Animal Production Science
Journal Banner
  Food, Fibre and Pharmaceuticals from Animals
 
blank image Search
 
blank image blank image
blank image
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notes for Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
Referee Guidelines
Review Article
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

New Feature

New Commenting Tool
Join the conversation and leave comments on all new journal articles.


blue arrow e-Alerts
blank image
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

red arrow Connect with us
blank image
facebook   youtube

 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 52(8)

Assessing red deer antler density with a hydrostatic method versus a new parametric volume-modelling technique using 3D-CAD

M. A. R. Paramio A, J. Muñoz-Cobo B, J. Moro C, R. Gutierrez C, A. Oya D, S. Tellado B and C. Azorit B E

A Department of Graphic Engineering, Design and Projects, Higher Polytechnic School, University of Jaén, 23071, Spain.
B Department of Animal and Vegetal Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071, Spain.
C Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment (National Parks), 23071, Spain.
D Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Jaén, 23071, Spain.
E Corresponding author. Email: cazorit@ujaen.es

Animal Production Science 52(8) 750-755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN12015
Submitted: 13 January 2012  Accepted: 3 February 2012   Published: 29 May 2012


 
PDF (524 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  
Abstract

Two methods of volume measurement were compared, to develop a simple and reliable method for estimating the whole-antler density. We used 10 cast antlers, previously dried and weighed, from 10 different red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) individuals. The volumes were determined by the traditional Archimedes method versus a new parametric volume-modelling technique using a ‘computer-aided design-three dimensions’ (3D-CAD), which is now being used in the biomedical industry in applications such as medical-implant design, tissue engineering and in developing a better understanding of anatomical functionality and morphological analysis. The process paths to follow in the generation of CAD models from cast antlers were described. The whole-antler density was estimated from the weight and volume measurement and a paired-sample comparison procedure was performed to assess differences between volumes as well as densities. Cast-antler weight ranged from 219.93 to 1857.9 g, and the volume estimated by the hydrostatic method was 732.45 ± 474.06 cm3 and by the CAD-3D method it was 730.65 ± 492.59 cm3. The DM density of the antler by the hydrostatic method (Density A) was 1.112 ± 0.120 g/cm3, ranging from 0.915 to 1.345 g/cm3 (Shapiro–Wilks, P = 0.449), and by the 3D-CAD method (Density B) it was 1.112 ± 0.158 g/cm3, ranging from 0.939 to 1.326 g/cm3 (Shapiro–Wilks, P = 0.751). There were no differences in the volume (t = 0.95, P = 0.37) or density (t = 0.54, P = 0.60) between the two methods and the correlation coefficient between Density A and Density B was 0.968. Both methods had similar reliability, although the computing process with the 3D-CAD system calculated antler volume faster than did the traditional hydrostatic weighing. 3D-CAD also avoided cast damage and the methodological problems with larger or smaller antlers or with floatability due to low density, which occur when using the hydrostatic method.

Additional keywords: cast-antler density, hydrostatic weighing.


References

Álvarez G, Martínez T, Martínez E (1991) Winter diet of red deer stag (Cervus elaphus L.) and its relationship to morphology and habitat in central Spain. Folia Zoologica 40, 117–130.

Azorit C, Analla M, Carrasco R, Muñoz-Cobo J (2002) Influence of age and environment on antler traits in Spanish red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 48, 137–144.
CrossRef |

Bézier P (1972) ‘Numerical control, mathematics and applications.’ (Wiley: London) [Translated by AR Forrest].

Chen P-Y, Stokes AG, Mckittrick J (2009) Comparison of the structure and mechanical properties of bovine femur bone and antler of the North American elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis). Acta Biomaterialia 5, 693–706.
CrossRef |

Currey JD (1979) Mechanical properties of bone tissues with greatly differing functions. Journal of Biomechanics 12, 313–319.
CrossRef | CAS |

Darling A, Sun W (2004) 3D Microtomographic characterization of precision extruded poly-3-caprolactone tissue scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B: Applied Biomaterials 70B, 311–317.
CrossRef | CAS |

Estevez JA, Landete-Castillejos T, García A, Ceacero F, Gallego L (2008) Population management and bone structural effects in composition and radio-opacity of iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) antler. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54, 215–223.
CrossRef |

Forrest AR (1972) Interactive interpolation and approximation by Bézier polynomials. The Computer Journal 15, 71–79.

Gaspar-López E, Landete-Castillejos T, Gallego L, García AJ (2008) Antler growth rate in yearling Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). European Journal of Wildlife Research 54, 753–755.
CrossRef |

Gaspar-López E, Landete-Castillejos T, Estevez JA, Ceacero F, Gallego L, García AJ (2010) Biometrics, testosterone, cortisol and antler growth cycle in Iberian red deer stags (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Reproduction in Domestic Animals 45, 243–249.
CrossRef |

Gómez JA, Landete-Castillejos T, García AJ, Gallego L (2006) Importance of growth on body size and antler development in the Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus). Livestock Science 105, 27–34.
CrossRef |

Hollister SJ, Levy R, Chu TM, Hollaran JW, Feinberg SE (2000) An image based approach for designing and manufacturing of craniofacial scaffolds. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 29, 67–71.
CrossRef | CAS |

Hyvärinen H, Kay RNB (1977) Variation in the weight, specific gravity and composition of the antler of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). The British Journal of Nutrition 38, 301–311.
CrossRef |

Kurazume R (2009) 3D reconstruction of a femoral shape using a parametric model and two 2D fluoroscopic images. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 113, 202–211.
CrossRef |

Lal P, Sun W (2004) Computer modeling approach for microsphere-packed bone graft. Journal of Computer-Aided Design 36, 487–497.
CrossRef |

Landete-Castillejos T, Currey JD, Estevez JA, García A, Gallego L (2007) Influence of physiological effort of growth and chemicals composition in antler bone mechanical properties. Bone 41, 794–803.
CrossRef | CAS |

Landete-Castillejos T, Currey JD, Estevez JA, Fierro Y, Calatayud A, Ceacero F, García A, Gallego L (2010) Do drastic weather effects on diet influence changes in chemical composition, mechanical properties and structure in deer antler? Bone 47, 815–825.
CrossRef | CAS |

Lees S (1982) Ultrasonic measurement of deer antler, bovine tibia and tympanic bulla. Journal of Biomechanics 15, 867–874.
CrossRef | CAS |

Lin ASP, Barrows TH, Cartmell SH, Guldberg RE (2003) Micro-architectural and mechanical characterization of oriented porous polymer scaffolds. Biomaterials 24, 481–489.
CrossRef | CAS |

Miller KV, Marchinton RL, Beckwith JR (1985) Variations in density and chemical composition of white-tailed deer antler. Journal of Mammalogy 66, 693–701.
CrossRef |

Minns RJ, Bibb R, Banks R, Sutton RA (2003) The use of a reconstructed three-dimensional solid model from CT to aid the surgical management of a total knee arthroplasty: a case study. Medical Engineering & Physics 25, 523–526.
CrossRef | CAS |

Müller R, Matter S, Neuenschwander P, Suter UW, Rüegsegger P (1996) 3D micro tomographic imaging and quantitative morphometry for the non-destructive evaluation of porous biomaterials. In ‘Morphological control in multiphase polymer mixtures. Proceedings of the Materials Research Society. Vol. 461’. (Eds R Briber, DG Pfeiffer, CC Han). pp. 217–222.

Soriguer RC, Fandos P, Bernaldez E, Delibes JR (1994) ‘E1 ciervo en Andalucía. Junta de Andalucia. Consejería de agricultura y pesca.’ (Dirección General de Desarrollo Forestal: Sevilla, Spain)

Sun W (2005) Bio-CAD modeling and its aplications in computer-aided tissue engineering. Computer Aided Design 37, 1097–1114.
CrossRef |

Sun W, Darling A, Starly B, Nam J (2004a) Computer-aided tissue engineering. Part I: overview, scope and challenges. Journal of Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry 39, 29–47.
CrossRef | CAS |

Sun W, Starly B, Darling A, Gomez C (2004b) Computer-aided tissue engineering, part II: application to biomimetic modeling and design of tissue scaffolds. Journal of Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry 39, 49–58.
CrossRef | CAS |

Torres-Porras J, Carranza J, Pérez-González J (2009) Combined effects of drought and density on body and antler size of male Iberian red deer Cervus elaphus hispanicus: climate change implications. Wildlife Biology 15, 213–221.
CrossRef |

Viceconti M, Zannoni C, Pierotti L (1998) TRI2SOLID: an application of reverse engineering methods to the creation of CAD models of bone segments. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 56, 211–220.
CrossRef | CAS |


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

 


    
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2013