Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A systems approach to determine the effect of changes in gene expression in adipose tissue on productive and reproductive efficiency in dairy cattle

K. Huber A , A. Kenez A , J. P. McNamara B D and S. L. Shields C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Bischofsholer Damm 15/102, D-30173 Hannover, Germany.

B Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6310, USA.

C Elanco Animal Health, Prosser, WA, USA.

D Corresponding author. Email: mcnamara@wsu.edu

Animal Production Science 54(9) 1224-1227 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14209
Submitted: 12 March 2014  Accepted: 8 May 2014   Published: 10 July 2014

Abstract

In order to assess the patterns of metabolism that affect efficiency, an existing mechanistic metabolic model of dairy cows (Molly) was expanded to include transcriptional control of metabolism in adipose tissue and reproductive processes. Our objective was to test the effects of changes in gene transcription in adipose tissue on patterns of metabolism, reproductive processes and efficiency. The model describes the substrate sensitivity and maximum velocity for lipogenesis, esterification and lipolysis. Data were collected from first and second parity cows from various studies, and included nutrient intake, milk component output, changes in adipose tissue lipid, visceral and body protein and lipid, and metabolism rates in adipose tissue and gene transcription. The lipogenic pathways were primarily controlled by transcriptional changes, whereas lipolysis varied primarily by post-translational control. We used the difference in transcriptional and post-translational metabolic control to alter Vmax and Ks for lipogenesis and lipolysis; in addition, we modelled a range of energy costs for ion transport and protein turnover in liver, muscle and adipose tissues. Changing rates of lipogenesis and lipolysis (~four-fold) did not affect milk production or feed intake, but altered maintenance costs, fat accretion, energetic efficiency and reproduction. Increases in lipogenesis decreased postpartum interval to first ovulation; increases in rates of lipolysis increased the interval. Changes in metabolic rate from changing either adipose tissue metabolism or rate of ion transport and protein turnover affected rates of oestrogen and progesterone degradation, which affected follicular growth and corpus luteum function. This model may be used to help interpret genomic and transcriptomic data to pinpoint the most effective ways to select and manage for changes in productive and reproductive efficiency.

Additional keywords: agricultural systems, animal reproduction, dairy nutrition, system analysis.


References

Baldwin RL (1995) ‘Modeling ruminant digestion and metabolism. Ch. 16. Lactation.’ (Chapman and Hall: New York)

Baldwin RL, France J, Gill MA (1987) Metabolism of the lactating cow. I. Animal elements of a mechanistic model. The Journal of Dairy Research 54, 74–105.

Boer HMT, Stötzel C, Röblitz SR, Deuflard P, Veerkamp RF, Woelders H (2011) A simple mathematical model of the bovine estrous cycle: follicle development and endocrine interactions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 278, 20–3R1.
A simple mathematical model of the bovine estrous cycle: follicle development and endocrine interactions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3Mvjs1amuw%3D%3D&md5=57c3cf5d6d3ef481cb6036df09b03a15CAS |

Butler WR (2003) Energy balance relationships with follicular development, ovulation and fertility in postpartum dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 83, 211–218.
Energy balance relationships with follicular development, ovulation and fertility in postpartum dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hanigan MH, Palliser CC, Gregorini P (2009) Altering the representation of hormones and adding consideration of gestational metabolism in a metabolic cow model reduced prediction errors. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5043–5056.
Altering the representation of hormones and adding consideration of gestational metabolism in a metabolic cow model reduced prediction errors.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtF2qtrbO&md5=ab2d2bcaac40cfc611927b502a17afd3CAS |

Lean I, Rabiee A (2006) Quantitative metabolic and epidemiological approaches to the fertility of the dairy cow. In ‘Proceedings of the Dairy Cattle Reproductive Council, DCRC, November 2006’. pp. 115–131.

McNamara JP, Baldwin RL (2000) Estimation of parameters describing lipid metabolism in lactation: challenge of existing knowledge described in a model of metabolism. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 128–143.

McNamara JP, Shields SL (2013) Reproduction during lactation of dairy cattle: integrating nutritional aspects of reproductive control in a systems research approach. Animal Frontiers 3, 76–83.
Reproduction during lactation of dairy cattle: integrating nutritional aspects of reproductive control in a systems research approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Shields SL, Woelders H, Boer M, Stötzel C, Röeblitz S, Plöntzke J, McNamara JP (2012) Integrating nutritional and reproductive models to improve reproductive efficiency in dairy cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 92, 556

Stötzel C, Plöntzke J, Röeblitz S (2011) Advances in modeling of the bovine estrous cycle: administration of PGF2α. ZIB Report 11-17, Zuse Institute, Berlin.