Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of different doses of sodium monensin on feeding behaviour, dry matter intake variation and selective consumption of feedlot Nellore cattle

Murillo C. S. Pereira A , Tássia V. B. Carrara B , Juliana da Silva A , Diego P. Silva A , Daniel H. M. Watanabe A , Lais A. Tomaz A , Mário D. B. Arrigoni B and Danilo D. Millen A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A São Paulo State University (UNESP), Animal Science College, Rodovia Comandante João Ribeiro de Barros Km 651, Dracena, Brazil.

B São Paulo State University (UNESP), Department of Breeding and Animal Nutrition, Botucatu, Brazil.

C Corresponding author. Email: danilomillen@dracena.unesp.br

Animal Production Science 55(2) 170-173 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14306
Submitted: 13 March 2014  Accepted: 3 July 2014   Published: 16 December 2014

Abstract

The experiment was designed to determine the effects of different doses of sodium monensin (MON) on feeding behaviour, dry matter intake (DMI) variation and selective consumption of feedlot Nellore cattle. The experiment was a randomised complete block design, replicated 12 times, in which 60 20-month-old yearling Nellore bulls (402.52 ± 33.0 kg) were fed the following different doses of MON (expressed in mg per kg, on a DM basis) in individual pens for 84 days: 0, 9, 18, 27 and 36. The adaptation program consisted of ad libitum feeding of two adaptation diets over a period of 14 days with concentrate level increasing from 68% to 84% of diet DM. Orthogonal contrasts were used to assess linear, quadratic, cubic and quartic relationships between doses of MON and the dependent variable. As the dose of MON increased, the time spent ruminating (P < 0.01), feeding efficiency of DM (P < 0.05) and feeding efficiency of neutral detergent fibre (NDF; P < 0.05) were affected linearly during the period of adaptation. For the finishing period, as the dose of MON increased, time spent eating and ruminating, and feeding efficiency of DM were affected quadratically (P < 0.05), in which animals fed 9 ppm of MON presented better feeding efficiency of DM. Thus, as animals fed 9 ppm of MON presented better feeding efficiency of DM and NDF during the adaptation and finishing periods, it should be the dose of choice for feedlot Nellore cattle.

Additional keywords: acidosis, efficiency, fluctuation.


References

Allen MS (1996) Physical constraints on voluntary intake of forages by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 74, 3063–3075.

Bevans DW, Beauchemin KA, Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, McKinnon JJ, McAllister TA (2005) Effect of rapid or gradual grain adaptation on subacute acidosis and feed intake by feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 83, 1116–1132.

Deswysen AG, Ellis WC, Pond KR, Jenkins WL, Connelly J (1987) Effects of monensin on voluntary intake, eating and ruminating behavior and ruminal motility in heifers fed corn silage. Journal of Animal Science 64, 827–834.

Duffield TF, Merrill JK, Bagg RN (2012) Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin in beef cattle on feed efficiency, body weight gain, and dry matter intake. Journal of Animal Science 90, 4583–4592.
Meta-analysis of the effects of monensin in beef cattle on feed efficiency, body weight gain, and dry matter intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXns1SqsA%3D%3D&md5=40d8ad40087ab6a91f94e73418beafacCAS | 22859759PubMed |

Ellis JL, Dijkstra J, Bannink A, Kebreab E, Hook SE, Archibeque S, France J (2012) Quantifying the effect of monensin dose on the rumen volatile fatty acid profile in high-grain-fed beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2717–2726.
Quantifying the effect of monensin dose on the rumen volatile fatty acid profile in high-grain-fed beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XhtlSgs7jN&md5=96ae4090d3206545c54a04e377d25e6eCAS | 22896736PubMed |

Erickson GE, Milton CT, Fanning KC, Cooper RJ, Swingle RS, Parrott JC, Vogel G, Klopfenstein TJ (2003) Interaction between bunk management and monensin concentration on finishing performance, feeding behavior, and ruminal metabolism during an acidosis challenge with feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2869–2879.

Fox DG, Tedeschi LO, Tylutki TP, Russell JB, Van Amburgh ME, Chase LE, Pell AN, Overton TR (2004) The cornell net carbohydrate and protein system model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112, 29–78.
The cornell net carbohydrate and protein system model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmvFymsQ%3D%3D&md5=25935ea755db8cd57530a9e85de2633aCAS |

Heinrichs J, Kononoff P (1996) Evaluating particle size of forages and TMRs using the Penn State Particle Size Separator. pp. 1–14. (The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA)

Millen DD, Pacheco RDL, Arrigoni MDB, Galyean ML, Vasconcelos JTA (2009) Snapshot of management practices and nutritional recommendations used by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3427–3439.
Snapshot of management practices and nutritional recommendations used by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXht1WksL3E&md5=28eadcaf405fc043542b8a09486e8173CAS | 19574564PubMed |

Robles V, González LA, Ferret A, Manteca X, Calsamiglia S (2007) Effects of feeding frequency on intake, ruminal fermentation, and feeding behavior in heifers fed high-concentrate diets. Journal of Animal Science 85, 2538–2547.
Effects of feeding frequency on intake, ruminal fermentation, and feeding behavior in heifers fed high-concentrate diets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFSjtrjM&md5=df7b80ecb701ec4fd44fed26adbc6d32CAS | 17609471PubMed |

SAS Institute (2003) ‘SAS/STAT user’s guide. Release 9.1.’ (SAS Institute: Cary, NC)

Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Beauchemin KA, Mcallister TA, Gibb DJ, Streeter M (2004) Effect of feed delivery fluctuations and feeding time on ruminal acidosis, growth performance, and feeding behavior of feedlot cattle. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3357–3365.

Spears JW (1990) Ionophores and nutrient digestion and absorption in ruminants. The Journal of Nutrition 120, 632–638.

Stock RA, Laudert SB, Stroup WW, Larson EM, Parrott JC, Britton RA (1995) Effect of monensin and monensin and tylosin combination on feed intake variation of feedlot steers. Journal of Animal Science 73, 39–44.

Van Soest PJ (1994). ‘Nutritional ecology of the ruminant.’ 2nd edn. (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY)

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FnvVCltA%3D%3D&md5=1b837d0361716b7c813fff797a7701e0CAS | 1660498PubMed |

Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA, Vedres DD (2002) Effects of pH and fibrolytic enzymes on digestibility, bacterial protein synthesis, and fermentation in continuous culture. Animal Feed Science and Technology 102, 137–150.
Effects of pH and fibrolytic enzymes on digestibility, bacterial protein synthesis, and fermentation in continuous culture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XovFGnu7g%3D&md5=d7b5cf76de369edfb6ca21f62b054ae2CAS |