Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Thermoregulatory differences in lactating dairy cattle classed as efficient or inefficient based on residual feed intake

K. DiGiacomo A D , L. C. Marett B , W. J. Wales B , B. J. Hayes C , F. R. Dunshea A and B. J. Leury A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A The Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia.

B Agricultural Research Division, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Ellinbank, Vic. 3821, Australia.

C Biosciences Research Division, Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Bundoora, Vic. 3083, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: Kristyd@unimelb.edu.au

Animal Production Science 54(10) 1877-1881 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14311
Submitted: 13 March 2014  Accepted: 17 June 2014   Published: 19 August 2014

Abstract

It is suggested that one-third of the inter-animal differences in efficiency is explained by differences in digestion, heat production, body composition and activity; while the remaining variation is the result of energy expenditure due to biological processes such as ion pumps and mitochondrial function. Inefficient animals may be wasting energy on inefficient processes resulting in increased heat production that may be reflected by differences in skin and core temperature. While the association between heat production and residual feed intake (RFI) has been touched on, it is yet to be fully elucidated. It is hypothesised that more efficient animals will expend less energy as heat, which will be reflected by differences in core and skin temperature measures. Fifty-four primiparous, Holstein-Friesian cows previously assessed for RFI (26 inefficient/high RFI, 28 efficient/low RFI) were selected and drafted into outdoor holding yards for measurements on two occasions (once during lactation and once during the non-lactating ‘dry’ period). Measures of body temperature were obtained using an infrared (IR) camera to obtain skin (surface) temperatures at multiple locations [muzzle, eye, jaw, ear, leg (front and back), rump, shoulder, teat, udder, side and tail] and rectal temperatures were measured using a digital thermometer. Respiration rates (RR) were obtained by counting the number of flank movements in 1 min. A subset of 16 cows (8 efficient and 8 inefficient) were utilised for further IR imagery in an undercover environment (to eliminate the influences of external environments). Skin temperature measurement obtained using an IR camera during the outdoor period demonstrated that inefficient cows had higher (0.65°C) teat temperatures (P = 0.05). Rectal temperature and RR were not influenced by efficiency group. When IR images were obtained undercover inefficient cows tended to have higher shoulder (0.85°C) and neck (0.98°C) temperatures than efficient cows (P < 0.087); while udder temperature was significantly greater (1.61°C) for inefficient than efficient cows (P = 0.018). These data indicate that some of the differences in efficiency may be attributed to differences in thermoregulation, as reflected by differences in skin (but not core) temperature and that IR imagery is a suitable method for determining these differences in a non-invasive manner. Further research is required to further establish these relationships, and the measurement of skin temperatures should be undertaken indoors to eliminate external environmental influences.

Additional keywords: efficiency, feed conversion efficiency (FCE), physiology, temperature.


References

Banerjee D, Ashutosh (2011) Effect of thermal exposure on diurnal rhythms of physiological parameters and feed, water intake in Tharparkar and Karan Fries heifers. Biological Rhythm Research 42, 39–51.
Effect of thermal exposure on diurnal rhythms of physiological parameters and feed, water intake in Tharparkar and Karan Fries heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Blaxter KL (1962) ‘The energy metabolism of ruminants.’ (Hutchinson: London)

Britt JS, Thomas RC, Speer NC, Hall MB (2003) Efficiency of converting nutrient dry matter to milk in Holstein herds. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3796–3801.
Efficiency of converting nutrient dry matter to milk in Holstein herds.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXptFais7w%3D&md5=cf497d696680f6fdee75f6ac41bc1139CAS | 14672212PubMed |

Herd RM, Arthur PF (2009) Physiological basis for residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 87, E64–E71.
Physiological basis for residual feed intake.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M3mtVWksA%3D%3D&md5=d6c00014ca611dad7617e26c1736d6a0CAS | 19028857PubMed |

Hutjens MF (2007) Practical approaches to feed efficiency and applications on the farm. In ‘Pennsylvania State dairy nutrition workshop’. Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.

Montanholi YR, Odongo NE, Swanson KC, Schenkel FS, McBride BW, Miller SP (2008) Application of infrared thermography as an indicator of heat and methane production and its use in the study of skin temperature in response to physiological events in dairy cattle (Bos taurus). Journal of Thermal Biology 33, 468–475.

Montanholi YR, Swanson KC, Palme R, Schenkel FS, McBride BW, Lu D, Miller SP (2010) Assessing feed efficiency in beef steers through feeding behavior, infrared thermography and glucocorticoids. animal 4, 692–701.
Assessing feed efficiency in beef steers through feeding behavior, infrared thermography and glucocorticoids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3cXksVehtb0%3D&md5=b713ef76f4868cef3389e189e9a35ea9CAS | 22444121PubMed |

Payne RW, Harding SA, Murray DA, Soutar DM, Baird DB, Welham SJ, Kane AF, Gilmour R, Thompson R, Webster R, Tunnicliffe Wilson G (2008) ‘Genstat release 11 reference manual.’ (VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK)

Reynolds CK, Crompton LA, Mills JAN (2011) Improving the efficiency of energy utilisation in cattle. Animal Production Science 51, 6–12.
Improving the efficiency of energy utilisation in cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Williams YJ, Pryce JE, Grainger C, Wales WJ, Linden N, Porker M, Hayes BJ (2011) Variation in residual feed intake in Holstein-Friesian dairy heifers in southern Australia. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4715–4725.
Variation in residual feed intake in Holstein-Friesian dairy heifers in southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtV2gsb%2FE&md5=4aee3a257ffa3ce44e2aa0b7dd90ea96CAS | 21854946PubMed |