Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The use of walk over weigh to predict calving date in extensively managed beef herds

Michael N. Aldridge A E , Stephen J. Lee A , Julian D. Taylor B , Greg I. Popplewell C , Fergus R. Job D and Wayne S. Pitchford A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, SA 5371, Australia.

B School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, SA 5064, Australia.

C Popplewell Genetics, 33 Tom Schmidt Court, Mount Samson, Qld 4520, Australia.

D Australian Agricultural Company, Wylarah Station and Farm, Qld 4417, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: michael.aldridge@adelaide.edu.au

Animal Production Science 57(3) 583-591 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15172
Submitted: 2 April 2015  Accepted: 15 November 2015   Published: 23 March 2016

Abstract

Beef cattle reproductive rate in northern Australia is low and substantial effort is underway to make improvements. Collection of calf birth date to inform female reproductive rate data is often not practical. Therefore, there is a need to find alternative methods for collecting birth date data. The aim of the project was to trial an automated animal weighing technology (walk over weigh) to estimate calving date for cows in a northern breeding herd grazing in an extensive pasture system. Two-hundred and thirty-two Wagyu cows from a herd of 1195 with confirmed pregnancy tests were stocked in a paddock with a walk over weigh unit at the entry point of the water yard. Each calf born in the paddock was weighed, ear-tagged and a DNA sample collected. After processing, cleaning and smoothing the data, weight profiles of the 232 cows over a 119-day period were analysed. From the weight profiles and confirmed DNA parentage, 96 out of a possible 162 (59%) cows that calved had a correct calving date prediction. It is proposed that improvements in calving date prediction could be increased through engineering changes designed to slow cow movement over the walk over weigh unit. The trial demonstrated with the proposed changes that walk over weigh could be used to estimate calving date in extensive beef herds, with the expectation that this information could be used in genetic evaluation to improve reproductive rate in northern Australia.

Additional keywords: animal reproduction, tropical cattle.


References

Alawneh JI, Stevenson MA, Williamson NB, Lopez-Villalobos N, Otley T (2011) Automatic recording of daily walkover liveweight of dairy cattle at pasture in the first 100 days in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4431–4440.
Automatic recording of daily walkover liveweight of dairy cattle at pasture in the first 100 days in milk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtV2gsLnE&md5=fdfda4260d0cc272192d3a482d9ae920CAS | 21854916PubMed |

Bagshaw CS, Thorrold B, Davison M, Duncan IJH, Matthews LR (2008) The influence of season and of providing a water trough on stream use by beef cattle grazing hill-country in New Zealand. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109, 155–166.
The influence of season and of providing a water trough on stream use by beef cattle grazing hill-country in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bem C (2013) Automated cattle management systems nears commercialisation Engineers Australia. Engineers Media February, 48–49.

Bortolussi G, McIvor JG, Hodgkinson JJ, Coffey SG, Holmes CR (2005) The northern Australian beef industry, a snapshot. 2. Breeding herd performance and management. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 1075–1091.
The northern Australian beef industry, a snapshot. 2. Breeding herd performance and management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown MA, Lalman DL (2010) Milk yield and quality in cows sired by different beef breeds. The Professional Animal Scientist 26, 393–397.

Brown DJ, Savage DB, Hinch GN, Semple SJ (2012) Mob-based walk-over weights: similar to the average of individual static weights? Animal Production Science 52, 613–618.
Mob-based walk-over weights: similar to the average of individual static weights?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burns BM, Corbet NJ, Corbet DH, Crisp JM, Venus BK, Johnston DJ, Li Y, McGowan MR, Holroyd RG (2013) Male traits and herd reproductive capability in tropical beef cattle. 1. Experimental design and animal measures. Animal Production Science 53, 87–100.
Male traits and herd reproductive capability in tropical beef cattle. 1. Experimental design and animal measures.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXns12jsA%3D%3D&md5=1b938ba9883c4b86377abde7df18d588CAS |

Donoghue KA, Rekaya R, Misztal I (2004) Threshold-linear analysis of measures of fertility in artificial insemination data and days to calving in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 82, 987–993.

Echternkamp SE (1993) Relationship between placental development and calf birth-weight in beef-cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 32, 1–13.
Relationship between placental development and calf birth-weight in beef-cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finger A, Patison KP, Heath BM, Swain DL (2014) Changes in the group associations of free-ranging beef cows at calving. Animal Production Science 54, 270–276.
Changes in the group associations of free-ranging beef cows at calving.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gilleland E (2013) Two-dimensional Field Smoothing. R 1.0–1,

Graser H-U, Tier B, Johnston DJ, Barwick SA (2005) Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 913–921.
Genetic evaluation for the beef industry in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gregorini P, Gunter SA, Masino CA, Beck PA (2007) Effects of ruminal fill on short‐term herbage intake rate and grazing dynamics of beef heifers. Grass and Forage Science 62, 346–354.
Effects of ruminal fill on short‐term herbage intake rate and grazing dynamics of beef heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hogan JP, Petherick CJ, Phillips CJC (2007) The physiological and metabolic impacts on sheep and cattle of feed and water deprivation before and during transport. Nutrition Research Reviews 20, 17–28.
The physiological and metabolic impacts on sheep and cattle of feed and water deprivation before and during transport.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXpslehs74%3D&md5=5390ef92810183548df24a9f13d6d899CAS | 19079858PubMed |

Johnston DJ, Bunter KL (1996) Days to calving in Angus cattle: genetic and environmental effects, and covariances with other traits. Livestock Production Science 45, 13–22.
Days to calving in Angus cattle: genetic and environmental effects, and covariances with other traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Corbet NJ, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Williams PJ, Burrow HM (2009) Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer- and steer-production traits. Animal Production Science 49, 399–412.
Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer- and steer-production traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG (2010) Understanding the genetics of lactation anoestrus in Brahman beef cattle to enhance genetic evaluation of female reproductive traits. In ‘9th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production’. (German Society for Animal Science: Leipzig, Germany)

Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Williams PJ, Corbet NJ, Grant T (2014) Genetics of early and lifetime annual reproductive performance in cows of two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia. Animal Production Science 54, 1–15.
Genetics of early and lifetime annual reproductive performance in cows of two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCosker T, McLean D, Holmes P (2009) ‘Northern beef situation analysis.’ (Meat and Livestock Australia: Sydney)

Meyer K, Hammond K, Parnell PF, Mackinnon MJ, Sivarajasingam S (1990) Estimates of heritability and repeatability for reproductive traits in Australian beef-cattle. Livestock Production Science 25, 15–30.
Estimates of heritability and repeatability for reproductive traits in Australian beef-cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Meyer K, Johnston DJ, Graser HU (2004) Estimates of the complete genetic covariance matrix for traits in multi-trait genetic evaluation of Australian Hereford cattle. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 195–210.
Estimates of the complete genetic covariance matrix for traits in multi-trait genetic evaluation of Australian Hereford cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Peiper UM, Edan Y, Devir S, Barak M, Maltz E (1993) Automatic weighing of dairy cows. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 56, 13–24.
Automatic weighing of dairy cows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Core Team (2014) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at http://www.R-project.org/ [Verified 18 August 2015]

Rouda RR, Anderson DM, Wallace JD, Murray LW (1994) Free-ranging cattle water consumption in southcentral New Mexico. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39, 29–38.
Free-ranging cattle water consumption in southcentral New Mexico.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schatz TJ, Hearnden MN (2008) Heifer fertility on commercial cattle properties in the Northern Territory. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 940–944.
Heifer fertility on commercial cattle properties in the Northern Territory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sullivan TM, Micke GC, Magalhaes RS, Phillips NJ, Perry VEA (2009) Dietary protein during gestation affects placental development in heifers. Theriogenology 72, 427–438.
Dietary protein during gestation affects placental development in heifers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXptl2nsr4%3D&md5=18e449a4dc1c75171e977f7bef208aafCAS | 19540576PubMed |

Wand M, Ripley B (2015) KernSmooth: functions for kernel smoothing supporting Wand & Jones (1995). R package version 2.23-15. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=KernSmooth [Verified 29 June 2015]

Whan I, Bortolussi G, Backus R (2006) The impact of innovation on beef production in far northern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 271–282.
The impact of innovation on beef production in far northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wintour EM, Laurence BM, Lingwood BE (1986) Anatomy, physiology and pathology of the amniotic and allantoic compartments in the sheep and cow. Australian Veterinary Journal 63, 216–221.
Anatomy, physiology and pathology of the amniotic and allantoic compartments in the sheep and cow.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaL2s%2FkvVGmsA%3D%3D&md5=867585eaaf6e2bc1950cfa65df676f09CAS | 3778370PubMed |

Zhang YD, Johnston DJ, Bolormaa S, Hawken RJ, Tier B (2014) Genomic selection for female reproduction in Australian tropically adapted beef cattle. Animal Production Science 54, 16–24.
Genomic selection for female reproduction in Australian tropically adapted beef cattle.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhvVWksb3K&md5=ccb0bc411bdd939ef2942a69c81ce6b1CAS |