Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Variation of greenhouse gas emissions and identification of their drivers during the fattening of Belgian Blue White bulls based on a LCA approach

Michaël Mathot A E , Eric Elias B , Edouard Reding C , Amélie Vanlierde D , Werne Reuter B , Viviane Planchon A and Didier Stilmant A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Farming Systems, Territory and Information Technologies Unit, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, rue du Serpont 100, B-6800 Libramont, Belgium.

B DUMOULIN s.a., Parc Industriel 18, B-5300 Seilles, Belgium.

C AWE asbl., Département des Services aux Éleveurs, Rue des Champs Elysées 4, B-5590 Ciney, Belgium.

D Agricultural Product Technology Unit, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Rue de Liroux 8, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium.

E Corresponding author. Email: m.mathot@cra.wallonie.be

Animal Production Science 56(3) 322-329 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15592
Submitted: 15 September 2015  Accepted: 5 December 2015   Published: 9 February 2016

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI; kilograms carbon dioxide equivalents/kilograms liveweight gain) have to be reduced so as to limit the impact of human activities on global warming while furnishing food to human. In this respect, performances of 654 Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls (BBdm) during their fattening phase were recorded. On this basis, their greenhouse gas emissions were modelled to estimate variation in GHGI and investigate mitigation options at that level. The relevance of theses option is discussed, taking into account the whole life and production system scales. Large variations (mean (s.d.)) were observed (from 7.2 (0.4) to 10.0 (0.7) kg carbon dioxide equivalents/kg liveweight gain) for, respectively, the 1st- and 4th-quantile groups defined for GHGI. Early culling, low liveweight and age at start of the fattening phase of the bulls would lead to a reduction of GHGI. Nevertheless, more than 32% of the variation remained unexplained. However, decision leading to reduction of GHG intensity at this stage of the life may be compensated in the early stage of BBdm. Attention is drawn on the necessity to encompass the whole life of BBdm for investigating mitigation options and on the sensitivity of the results on models and methodological choices.

Additional keywords: life-cycle assessment, mitigation, system approach.


References

ADLO (2013) ‘Voeding van runderen van het belgisch witblauw ras.’ (Vlaams Overhied Departement Landbouw an Visserij, Afdeling Duurzame Landbouwintwikkeling Voorlichting en Vorming: Brussels, Belgium) [In Dutch] Available at http://lv.vlaanderen.be/nl/voorlichting-info/publicaties [Verified 15 December 2015]

AGW (2011) Arrêté du gouvernement wallon modifiant le livre II du code de l’environnement contenant le code de l’eau en ce qui concerne la gestion durable de l’azote en agriculture, 31 March 2011. Available at http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be [Verified 15 December 2015]

Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) ‘World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision.’ ESA working paper No. 12-03. (FAO: Rome)

Basarab JA, Beauchemin KA, Baron VS, Ominski KH, Guan LL, Miller SP, Crowley JJ (2013) Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production. Animal 7, 303–315.
Reducing GHG emissions through genetic improvement for feed efficiency: effects on economically important traits and enteric methane production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23739472PubMed |

de Boer I, Cederberg C, Eady S, Gollnow S, Kristensen T, Macleod M, Meul M, Nemecek T, Phong L, Thoma G, van der Werf H, Williams A, Zonderland-Thomassen M (2011) Greenhouse gas mitigation in animal production: towards an integrated life cycle sustainability assessment. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3, 423–431.
Greenhouse gas mitigation in animal production: towards an integrated life cycle sustainability assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

De Campeneere S, Fiems LO, Cottyn BG, Boucqué CV (1999) Phase-feeding to optimize performance and quality of Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls. Animal Science 69, 275–285.

De Campeneere S, Fiems LO, Boucqué ChV (2001) Energy and protein requirements of Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 153–167.
Energy and protein requirements of Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjtlCjur0%3D&md5=03c9cecf9992e92ac65f4224361001a0CAS |

Doreau M, van der Werf HMG, Micol D, Dubroeucq H, Agabriel J, Rochette Y, Martin C (2011) Enteric methane production and greenhouse gases balance of diets differing in concentrate in the fattening phase of a beef production system. Journal of Animal Science 89, 2518–2528.
Enteric methane production and greenhouse gases balance of diets differing in concentrate in the fattening phase of a beef production system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXps12jtrw%3D&md5=6abb9bf4c85a0c8e26af3786f3c1ab36CAS | 21383032PubMed |

EMEP (2013) ‘Air pollutant emission inventory guidebook. Part B: sectoral guidance chapters. Chapter 3.B: Agriculture – Manure management.’ Available at http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/emep-eea-guidebook-2013 [Verified 15 December 2015]

FAO (2015) Environmental Performance of Large Ruminant Supply Chains: Guidelines for quantification, Rome, Italy. Available at http://www.fao.org/partnerships/leap/resources/public-review/en/ [Verified 15 December 2015]

Fiems LO, De Campeneere S, De Boever JL, Vanacker JM (2002) Performance of double-muscled bulls affected by grazing or restricted indoor feed intake during the growing period followed by finishing up to two different slaughter weights. Livestock Production Science 77, 35–43.
Performance of double-muscled bulls affected by grazing or restricted indoor feed intake during the growing period followed by finishing up to two different slaughter weights.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Jounral of. Environmental. Management 91, 1–21.
Recent developments in life cycle assessment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gerber P, Opio C, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Animal Production and Health Division (2013) Greenhouse gas emission from ruminant supply chains: a global life cycle assessment. Rome, Italy.

GRA (2015) ‘Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from livestock: best practice and emerging options.’ Available at http://globalresearchalliance.org [Verified August 2015]

Herdbook (2015) Les performances de la race Charolaise. Available at http://www.charolaise.fr/Chiffres-cles [Verified 15 December 2015]

IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In ‘IPCC national greenhouse gas inventories programme’. (Eds LB Simon Eggleston, K Miwa, T Ngara, K Tanabe) (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)

IPCC (2007) ‘Climate change 2007: the physical science basis.’ Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Koch P, Salou T (2013) ‘AGRIBALYSE: methodology report. Version 1.1.’ (ADEME: Angers, France)

Mathot M, Decruyenaere V, Stilmant D, Lambert R (2013) Contrasted greenhouse gas emissions from sored solid manure produced in tie-stall and deep litter barns. In ‘Emissions of gas and dust from livestock’. Edn IFIP-Institut du Porc – 1er trimestre 2013. (Eds M Hassouna, N Guigand) pp. 67–70. (INRA: Rennes, France; and IFIP: Le Rheu, France)

Nemecek T, Kägi T (2007) Life cycle inventories of Swiss and European agricultural production systems. Final report ecoinvent V2.0 No. 15a. Agroscope Reckenholz-Taenikon Research Station ART, Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, Zurich and Dübendorf, CH.

Nguyen TTH, van der Werf HMG, Eugène M, Veysset P, Devun J, Chesneau G, Doreau M (2012) Effects of type of ration and allocation methods on the environmental impacts of beef-production systems. Livestock Science 145, 239–251.
Effects of type of ration and allocation methods on the environmental impacts of beef-production systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nijdam D, Rood T, Westhoek H (2012) The price of protein: review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes. Food Policy 37, 760–770.
The price of protein: review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pelletier N, Pirog R, Rasmussen R (2010) Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States. Agricultural Systems 103, 380–389.
Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Pré (2013) ‘SimaPro 8.0.4.30.’

R Core Team (2014) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna) Available at http://www.R-project.org/ [Verified 15 December 2015]

Smith P (2014) Do grasslands act as a perpetual sink for carbon? Global Change Biology 20, 2708–2711.
Do grasslands act as a perpetual sink for carbon?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24604749PubMed |

Soussana J-F, Lemaire G (2014) Coupling carbon and nitrogen cycles for environmentally sustainable intensification of grasslands and crop-livestock systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 190, 9–17.
Coupling carbon and nitrogen cycles for environmentally sustainable intensification of grasslands and crop-livestock systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvVahur3F&md5=a30d42e7ac2dad137bfc948ff80221e1CAS |

Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006) ‘Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options.’ (Food and Agriculture Organisation/Livestock Environment and Development, Rome, Italy)

Tamminga S, Van Straalen WN, Subnel APJ, Meijer RGM, Steg A, Wener CJG, Block MC (1994) The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB system. Livestock Production Science 40, 139–155.
The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thoma G, Jolliet O, Wang Y (2013) A biophysical approach to allocation of life cycle environmental burdens for fluid milk supply chain analysis. International Dairy Journal 31, 41–49.
A biophysical approach to allocation of life cycle environmental burdens for fluid milk supply chain analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

van Dooren C, Marinussen M, Blonk H, Aiking H, Vellinga P (2014) Exploring dietary guidelines based on ecological and nutritional values: a comparison of six dietary patterns. Food Policy 44, 36–46.
Exploring dietary guidelines based on ecological and nutritional values: a comparison of six dietary patterns.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lemis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FnvVCltA%3D%3D&md5=5ac74045d70ec4fdb1b477d24fb39c1dCAS | 1660498PubMed |

Van Vliet J (1997) Energy and protein standards with respect to the nutritional requirements of dairy heifers, CVB-report no. 19. IKC-Landbouw, Ede. [In Dutch]