Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A comparison of the growth of Brahman and F1 Senepol × Brahman steers in an Indonesian feedlot

T. J. Schatz
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

NT Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, GPO Box 3000, Darwin NT, 0801. Email: tim.schatz@nt.gov.au

Animal Production Science 57(10) 2096-2099 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16211
Submitted: 6 April 2016  Accepted: 23 May 2016   Published: 29 July 2016

Abstract

This study compares the performance of F1 Senepol × Brahman steers (F1 SEN) to Brahman (BRAH) steers in an Indonesian feedlot. The focus was to address concerns that crossbred cattle are discriminated against by live export cattle buyers due to a perception that they do not perform as well as Brahmans in Indonesian feedlots. F1 SEN (n = 54) and BRAH (n = 32) steers that had grazed together since weaning at Douglas Daly Research Farm (Northern Territory) were exported to Indonesia and fed for 121 days in a feedlot near Lampung (Sumatra, Indonesia). The average daily gain of the F1 SEN steers over the feeding period was 0.17 kg/day higher (P < 0.001) than the BRAH steers (1.71 vs 1.54 kg/day). As a result the F1 SEN put on an average of 21.6 kg more over the 121-day feeding period and they did not have a higher mortality rate. Consequently, F1 SEN steers performed better than BRAH in an Indonesian feedlot and these results should encourage live export cattle buyers to purchase this type of cattle (Brahman crossed with a tropically adapted Bos taurus breed) with confidence that they can perform at least as well as Brahmans in Indonesian feedlots, although it should be noted that growth rates are usually higher in F1 crosses than in subsequent generations.

Additional keyword: Indonesia.


References

Burrow HM (2006) Utilization of diverse breed resources for tropical beef production. In ‘Proceedings of the 8th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production’, 13–18 August 2006, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Communication no. 32-01. pp. 31–39.

Chase CC, Olson TA, Hammond AC, Menchaca MA, West RL, Johnson DD, Butts WT (1998) Preweaning growth traits for Senepol, Hereford, and reciprocal crossbred calves and feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of steers. Journal of Animal Science 76, 2967–2975.

Crouse JD, Cundiff LV, Koch RM, Koohmaraie M, Seideman SC (1989) Comparisons of Bos indicus and Bos taurus inheritance for carcass beef characteristics and meat palatability. Journal of Animal Science 67, 2661–2668.

Davis GP (1993) Genetic parameters for tropical beef in northern Australia: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 179–198.
Genetic parameters for tropical beef in northern Australia: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Forster SJ (2012) Feed consumption and liveweight gain. Available at https://futurebeef.com.au/knowledge-centre/feedlots/beef-cattle-feedlots-feed-consumption-and-liveweight-gain/ [Verified 7 March 2016]

Frisch JE (1987) Physiological reasons for heterosis in growth of Bos inducus × Bos taurus. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 109, 213–230.
Physiological reasons for heterosis in growth of Bos inducus × Bos taurus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frisch JE, Vercoe JE (1984) An analysis of growth of different cattle genotypes reared in different environments. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 103, 137–153.
An analysis of growth of different cattle genotypes reared in different environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frisch JE, Munroe RK, O’Neill CJ (1987) Some factors related to calf crops of Brahman, Brahman crossbred and Hereford X Shorthorn cows in a stressful tropical environment. Animal Reproduction Science 15, 1–26.
Some factors related to calf crops of Brahman, Brahman crossbred and Hereford X Shorthorn cows in a stressful tropical environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaL1cXpt1WlsQ%3D%3D&md5=35c90a816b998014f277e704db934733CAS |

Gregory KE, Cundiff LV (1980) Crossbreeding in beef cattle: evaluation of systems. Journal of Animal Science 51, 1224–1242.

Johnson DD, Huffman RD, Williams SE, Hargrove DD (1990) Effects of percentage Brahman and Angus breeding, age-season of feeding and slaughter end point on meat palatability and muscle characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 68, 1980–1986.

Prayaga KC (2003) Evaluation of beef cattle genotypes and estimation of direct and maternal genetic effects in a tropical environment. 1. Growth traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 1013–1025.
Evaluation of beef cattle genotypes and estimation of direct and maternal genetic effects in a tropical environment. 1. Growth traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schatz TJ, Ridley PER, La Fontaine DJM, Hearnden MN (2007) Effects of genotype, sex and stocking rate on post weaning efficiency and value-adding potential at turnoff of weaners grazing improved pasture in the Douglas Daly region of the Northern Territory. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1272–1276.
Effects of genotype, sex and stocking rate on post weaning efficiency and value-adding potential at turnoff of weaners grazing improved pasture in the Douglas Daly region of the Northern Territory.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Schatz TJ, Thomas S, Geesink G (2014) Comparison of the growth and meat tenderness of Brahman and F1 Senepol Brahman steers. Animal Production Science 54, 1867–1870.
Comparison of the growth and meat tenderness of Brahman and F1 Senepol Brahman steers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) ‘Statistical methods.’ 8th edn. (Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA)