Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The effect of weight and age on pregnancy rates in Brahman heifers in northern Australia

T. J. Schatz A B and M. N. Hearnden A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A NT Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, GPO Box 3000, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia.

B Corresponding author. Email: tim.schatz@nt.gov.au

Animal Production Science 57(10) 2091-2095 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16212
Submitted: 6 April 2016  Accepted: 11 July 2016   Published: 29 August 2016

Abstract

The performance of Brahman heifers at their first mating as yearlings (4-year groups of ~100 per year) grazing on improved pasture in the Douglas Daly region and as 2 year olds (3-year groups of ~100 per year) grazing on native pasture in the Victoria River District was studied. The relationships between pre-mating weight and pregnancy rate were established for Brahman heifers mated as yearlings on improved pasture, and as 2 year olds on native pasture with pre-mating weights recorded in late October/early November (before the wet season starts) and in late December (just before the start of mating). These relationships were found to be different indicating that there is an interaction between age and weight that modifies the effect of weight. The relationships were used to model pregnancy rates that are likely to result from different pre-mating weights for these three scenarios. These estimates can be used to identify target mating weights for different situations, and to predict the pregnancy rates for groups of heifers, which will be useful in budgeting and assessing the profitability of different management strategies.

Additional keywords: fertility, heifer management, prediction.


References

Burns BM, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG (2010) A review of factors that impact on the capacity of beef females to conceive, maintain a pregnancy and wean a calf – implications for reproductive efficiency in northern Australia. Animal Reproduction Science 122, 1–22.
A review of factors that impact on the capacity of beef females to conceive, maintain a pregnancy and wean a calf – implications for reproductive efficiency in northern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cfotFWnsA%3D%3D&md5=eae32503ba158f76fa1e448587599e09CAS | 20447780PubMed |

Doogan VJ, Fordyce G, Shepherd RK, James TA, Holroyd RG (1991) The relationships between weight, growth from weaning to mating and conception rate of Bos indicus cross heifers in the dry tropics of North Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 139–144.
The relationships between weight, growth from weaning to mating and conception rate of Bos indicus cross heifers in the dry tropics of North Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Entwistle KW (1983) Factors influencing reproduction in beef cattle in Australia. AMRC Review 43, 1–30.

Fordyce G (2006) Practical strategies to reach target mating weight in north Australian beef heifers. In ‘Proceedings of the Australian cattle veterinarians conference, 16–19 November 2006, Port Macquarie’. pp. 142–152. (Australian Association of Cattle Veterinarians: Brisbane)

Fordyce G, Entwistle KW, Fitzpatrick LA (1994) Developing cost-effective strategies for improved fertility in Bos indicus cross cattle. Final Report, Project NAP2:DAQ.062/UNQ.009, Meat Research Corporation, North Sydney.

Fordyce G, Cooper NJ, Kendall IE, O’Leary BM (1996) Improving conception rates through nutrition in 2-year-old Brahman cross heifers in the dry tropics. In ‘Proceedings of reproduction in tropical cattle, satellite meeting of the 13th international congress on animal reproduction 1996’. Free Communication 8. (Tropical Beef Centre: Rockhampton, Qld)

Fordyce G, Coates R, Debney M, Haselton S, Rebgetz R, Laing A, Cooper N, Hall R, Holmes W, Doogan V (2009) A systems evaluation of high-input management using fortified molasses for beef production in Australia’s dry tropics. Animal Production Science 49, 177–191.
A systems evaluation of high-input management using fortified molasses for beef production in Australia’s dry tropics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Greer RC, Whittman RW, Staigmiller RB, Anderson DC (1983) Estimating the impact of management decisions on the occurrence of puberty in beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 56, 30–39.

Holroyd RG, Fordyce G (2001) Cost effective strategies for improved fertility in extensive and semi-extensive management conditions in northern Australia. In ‘4th Simposio Internacional de Reproduccion Animal’. (Ed. M Caccia) pp. 39–60. (Instituto de Reproducción Animal Córdoba: Cordoba, Argentina)

Johnston DJ, Barwick SA, Corbet NJ, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG, Williams PM, Burrow HM (2009) Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer- and steer-production traits. Animal Production Science 49, 399–412.
Genetics of heifer puberty in two tropical beef genotypes in northern Australia and associations with heifer- and steer-production traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lamond DR (1970) The influence of undernutrition on reproduction in the cow. Animal Breeding Abstracts 38, 359–372.

McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) ‘Generalized linear models.’ 2nd edn. (Chapman & Hall: London)

Mittlböck M (2002) Calculating adjusted R2 measures for Poisson regression models. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 68, 205–214.
Calculating adjusted R2 measures for Poisson regression models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12074847PubMed |

Moran C, Quirke JF, Roche JF (1989) Puberty in heifers: a review. Animal Reproduction Science 18, 167–182.
Puberty in heifers: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morgan JHL (1981) A comparison of breeds and their crosses for beef production. II. Growth and puberty of heifers. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 811–824.

Morris CA (1980) A review of relationships between aspects of reproduction in beef heifers and their lifetime production. 1. Associations with fertility in the first mating season and with age at first mating. Animal Breeding Abstracts 48, 655–675.

Patterson DJ, Perry RC, Kiracofe GH, Bellows RA, Staigmiller RB, Corah LR (1992) Management considerations in heifer development and puberty. Journal of Animal Science 70, 4018–4035.

Randel RD (1994) Unique reproductive traits of Brahman and Brahman based cows. In ‘Factors affecting calf crop’. (Eds MJ Fields, RS Sand) pp. 23–43. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)

Rudder TH, Seifert GW, Burrow HM (1985) Environmental and genotype effects on fertility in a commercial beef herd in central Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 25, 489–496.
Environmental and genotype effects on fertility in a commercial beef herd in central Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Short RE, Bellows RA (1971) Relationships among weight gains, age at puberty and reproductive performance in heifers. Journal of Animal Science 32, 127–131.

Sullivan RM, O’Rourke PK (1997) A comparison of once- and twice- yearly weaning of an extensive herd in northern Australia 1. Cow liveweights, mortalities and fertility. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 37, 279–286.
A comparison of once- and twice- yearly weaning of an extensive herd in northern Australia 1. Cow liveweights, mortalities and fertility.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Thallman RM, Cundiff LV, Gregory KE, Koch RM (1999) Germplasm evaluation in beef cattle – Cycle IV: postweaning growth and puberty of heifers. Journal of Animal Science 77, 2651–2659.