CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Animal Production Science
  Food, Fibre and Pharmaceuticals from Animals
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notes for Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

Training

Publication Workshops


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 45(4)

Biophysical and sociological impacts of farmyard manure and its potential role in meeting crop nutrient needs: a farmers’ survey in Madhya Pradesh, India

K. S. Reddy A, N. Kumar B, A. K. Sharma A, C. L. Acharya A, R. C. Dalal C D

A Indian Institute of Soil Science, Nabibagh, Berasia Road, Bhopal 462 038, India.
B Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Nabibagh, Berasia Road, Bhopal 462 038, India.
C Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, 80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Brisbane, Qld 4068, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: Ram.Dalal@nrm.qld.gov.au
 
PDF (152 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Cropping in Madhya Pradesh, Central India, experiences an overall nutrient deficit of about 1 Mt of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) annually. In addition to increasing the supply of inorganic fertilisers, the balance between inputs and losses must also be met by indigenous organic sources such as farmyard manure. Although large amounts of animal dung are produced in India, less than 50% of this is currently used to produce farmyard manure. With the objective of increasing manure production and manure nutrient use in cropping, we surveyed 100 farmers from 4 randomly selected villages in Madhya Pradesh to: record perceptions and attitudes towards farmyard manure use for crop production; estimate nutrient balances; and test fields for concentrations of soil organic carbon (C), nitrogen, and available nutrients.

All farmers’ field soils were low in organic C and available N, although available P, zinc and iron occurred in low to medium concentrations. However, the majority of farmers under-fertilised their crops, resulting in a negative nutrient balance; 0.9 Mt of NPK in 1997–98, which is predicted to increase to 1.8 Mt by 2020 over a 19 × 106 ha cropped area in Madhya Pradesh. All of the farmers surveyed believed that added farmyard manure improved their soil productivity and the majority also believed that farmyard manure increased crop yields; favourably affecting soil physical conditions and water-holding capacity. However, most farmers were not aware of the contribution of farmyard manure to plant nutrients.

The major constraint listed by all the surveyed farmers was the insufficient quantity of farmyard manure available for field application. Its production was restricted by the competitive use of about 50% of cattle dung as a domestic fuel. The marginal farmers (<0.9 ha farm size) expressed their unwillingness to shift to other fuel sources, presumably due to limited cash flow from the farm, however 58–85% of farmers with larger holdings (0.9–25 ha) were receptive to using alternative fuel sources such as liquid petroleum gas. Although the nutrient content of farmyard manure was found to be relatively low (about 7.6 kg N/t dry farmyard manure), use of all animal dung for manure should be encouraged by introducing liquid petroleum gas supply in villages. This would help to reverse the negative nutrient balance in Madhya Pradesh soils via an integrated nutrient management approach (utilisation of all nutrient sources and optimisation of crop nutrient requirements).

Keywords: nutrient balances, farmers’ perceptions, farmers’ attitude; competitive uses of FYM.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012