CSIRO Publishing Books Journals About Us Shopping Cart You are here: Journals > Animal Production Science   
Animal Production Science
  Food, Fibre and Pharmaceuticals from Animals
 
Search
 
 
  Advanced Search
   

Journal Home
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Contacts
Content
Online Early
Current Issue
Just Accepted
All Issues
Special Issues
Research Fronts
Reviews
Sample Issue
For Authors
General Information
Notes for Authors
Submit Article
Open Access
For Referees
General Information
Review Article
Annual Referee Index
For Subscribers
Subscription Prices
Customer Service
Print Publication Dates

 Early Alert
Subscribe to our Email Alert or RSS feeds for the latest journal papers.

 Connect with us
facebook   youtube

Training

Publication Workshops


 

Article << Previous     |     Next >>   Contents Vol 46(1)

Wool production and quality of three strains of Merino in a semi-arid environment under different grazing strategies

M. A. Friend A B D, G. E. Robards A C

A Department of Wool and Animal Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
B Current address: EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.
C Current address: 10 Clarence Street, Glenbrook, NSW 2773, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: mfriend@csu.edu.au
 
PDF (133 KB) $25
 Export Citation
 Print
  


Abstract

Three strains of Merino wethers (strong, medium and fine wool; n = 30 each; 3 years old) were grazed under 3 different management regimes (10 from each strain) in a semi-arid environment to test the hypothesis that attempting to keep liveweight stable at upper and lower levels would improve staple strength relative to sheep in which no attempt was made to limit liveweight fluctuations, and that strength and wool colour would not differ between strains. Sheep in the low grazing regime were managed in an attempt to keep liveweight stable at a level below that of sheep in the high grazing regime, which were managed in an attempt to keep liveweight stable at a level higher than sheep in the low grazing regime. For the control group, no attempt was made to limit liveweight fluctuations through grazing management. Sheep in the high grazing regime had greater liveweights throughout the experiment than sheep in the low grazing regime, while the liveweight of sheep in the control group was usually intermediate. Staple strength did not differ significantly between the strains, but was greater (P<0.05) for sheep in the high grazing regime (58.3 ± 2.2 N/ktex) than for sheep in the control (39.0 ± 2.3 N/ktex) and low (33.8 ± 2.3 N/ktex) grazing regimes, which did not differ significantly from each other. Wool yellowness was not affected by grazing regime, but was lower (P<0.05) in fine wool sheep (1.0 ± 0.1%) than medium wool sheep (1.4 ± 0.1%), which, in turn, was less (P<0.05) than in strong wool sheep (1.7 ± 0.1%). Staple strength was significantly (P<0.05) correlated with mean liveweight (0.27), mean fibre diameter (0.25), minimum fibre diameter (0.36), coefficient of variation of fibre diameter (–0.50), coefficient of variation of diameter along fibres (–0.48) and between fibres (–0.41). The results indicate staple strength was not adversely affected by the choice of strain in a semi-arid environment, and that nutritional management to limit fibre diameter variability can be an effective strategy to improve staple strength, regardless of strain.

Keywords: fibre diameter variability, wool growth.


   
Subscriber Login
Username:
Password:  

    


 
Top  Email this page
 
Legal & Privacy | Contact Us | Help

CSIRO

© CSIRO 1996-2012